Literature DB >> 36213342

Comprehensive analyses of image forgery detection methods from traditional to deep learning approaches: an evaluation.

Preeti Sharma1, Manoj Kumar2, Hitesh Sharma1.   

Abstract

The digital image proves critical evidence in the fields like forensic investigation, criminal investigation, intelligence systems, medical imaging, insurance claims, and journalism to name a few. Images are an authentic source of information on the internet and social media. But, using easily available software or editing tools such as Photoshop, Corel Paint Shop, PhotoScape, PhotoPlus, GIMP, Pixelmator, etc. images can be altered or utilized maliciously for personal benefits. Various active, passive and other new deep learning technology like GAN approaches have made photo-realistic images difficult to distinguish from real images. Digital image tamper detection now focuses on determining the authenticity and consistency of digital photos. The major research problems use generic solutions and strategies, such as standardized data sets, benchmarks, evaluation criteria and generalized approaches.This paper overviews the evaluation of various image tamper detection methods. A brief discussion of image datasets and a comparative study of image criminological (forensic) methods are included in this paper. Furthermore, recently developed deep learning techniques along with their limitations have also been addressed. This study aims to comprehensively analyze image forgery detection methods using conventional and advanced deep learning approaches.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Copy-move forgery detection; Data-driven methods; Deep learning-based detection techniques; Digital image forensics; GAN; Image splicing

Year:  2022        PMID: 36213342      PMCID: PMC9525232          DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-13808-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multimed Tools Appl        ISSN: 1380-7501            Impact factor:   2.577


  8 in total

1.  A Geometric Model for Specularity Prediction on Planar Surfaces with Multiple Light Sources.

Authors:  Alexandre Morgand; Mohamed Tamaazousti; Adrien Bartoli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  Hybrid LSTM and Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Detection of Image Forgeries.

Authors:  Jawadul H Bappy; Cody Simons; Lakshmanan Nataraj; B S Manjunath; Amit K Roy-Chowdhury
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  Health outcomes in decompensated congestive heart failure: a comparison of tertiary hospitals in Brazil and United States.

Authors:  Luis E Rohde; Nadine Clausell; Jorge Pinto Ribeiro; Lívia Goldraich; Rafael Netto; G William Dec; Thomas G DiSalvo; Carísi A Polanczyk
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  The Effect of the Color Filter Array Layout Choice on State-of-the-Art Demosaicing.

Authors:  Ana Stojkovic; Ivana Shopovska; Hiep Luong; Jan Aelterman; Ljubomir Jovanov; Wilfried Philips
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Generating Images with Physics-Based Rendering for an Industrial Object Detection Task: Realism versus Domain Randomization.

Authors:  Leon Eversberg; Jens Lambrecht
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.