Cynthia K McClard1, Dimitrios Pollalis1,2, Farzad Jamshidi1, Ronald Kingsley1, Sun Young Lee1,2,3. 1. Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. 2. USC Roski Eye Institute, USC Ginsburg Institute for Biomedical Therapeutics and Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Abstract
Purpose: To show the utility of genetic testing in inherited retinal disease (IRD) patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a single academic center and comprised 59 patients clinically diagnosed with IRD who had testing via the Invitae IRD Panel (Invitae Corp). Samples were collected from August 2019 to April 2021. The rates of genetic diagnosis and disease-category specific results (ie, positive, undetermined, negative) were assessed. Results: Testing results were returned a mean of 20 days (range, 14-28 days) after submission. Of the samples, 50.8% (30/59) had a diagnostic yield. By disease category, the yield was 46.4% (13/28) nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP), 50.0% (4/8) syndromic RP, 46.2% (6/13) macular dystrophies, 75.0% (3/4) cone or cone-rod dystrophies, and 80.0% (4/5) other retinopathies; there were no cases of rod dystrophies. The results were undetermined in 47.5% of patients (28/59) because of identification of only 1 recessive mutation (5.1%; 3/59), 1 recessive mutation and at least 1 variant of uncertain significance (VUS) (13.6%; 8/59), or VUS only (28.8%; 17/59). One patient (1.7%) received negative testing results with no mutations or VUS identified. Conclusions: Open-access, no-charge panel testing offers a reasonable diagnostic yield. Accurate clinical diagnosis of IRD before testing and acknowledgment of the limitations of panel testing are critical. The results add to the current estimates of the value of genetic testing for retina specialists in the management of IRD.
Purpose: To show the utility of genetic testing in inherited retinal disease (IRD) patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a single academic center and comprised 59 patients clinically diagnosed with IRD who had testing via the Invitae IRD Panel (Invitae Corp). Samples were collected from August 2019 to April 2021. The rates of genetic diagnosis and disease-category specific results (ie, positive, undetermined, negative) were assessed. Results: Testing results were returned a mean of 20 days (range, 14-28 days) after submission. Of the samples, 50.8% (30/59) had a diagnostic yield. By disease category, the yield was 46.4% (13/28) nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP), 50.0% (4/8) syndromic RP, 46.2% (6/13) macular dystrophies, 75.0% (3/4) cone or cone-rod dystrophies, and 80.0% (4/5) other retinopathies; there were no cases of rod dystrophies. The results were undetermined in 47.5% of patients (28/59) because of identification of only 1 recessive mutation (5.1%; 3/59), 1 recessive mutation and at least 1 variant of uncertain significance (VUS) (13.6%; 8/59), or VUS only (28.8%; 17/59). One patient (1.7%) received negative testing results with no mutations or VUS identified. Conclusions: Open-access, no-charge panel testing offers a reasonable diagnostic yield. Accurate clinical diagnosis of IRD before testing and acknowledgment of the limitations of panel testing are critical. The results add to the current estimates of the value of genetic testing for retina specialists in the management of IRD.
Authors: Stephen Russell; Jean Bennett; Jennifer A Wellman; Daniel C Chung; Zi-Fan Yu; Amy Tillman; Janet Wittes; Julie Pappas; Okan Elci; Sarah McCague; Dominique Cross; Kathleen A Marshall; Jean Walshire; Taylor L Kehoe; Hannah Reichert; Maria Davis; Leslie Raffini; Lindsey A George; F Parker Hudson; Laura Dingfield; Xiaosong Zhu; Julia A Haller; Elliott H Sohn; Vinit B Mahajan; Wanda Pfeifer; Michelle Weckmann; Chris Johnson; Dina Gewaily; Arlene Drack; Edwin Stone; Katie Wachtel; Francesca Simonelli; Bart P Leroy; J Fraser Wright; Katherine A High; Albert M Maguire Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James O'Sullivan; Brendan G Mullaney; Sanjeev S Bhaskar; Jonathan E Dickerson; Georgina Hall; Anna O'Grady; Andrew Webster; Simon C Ramsden; Graeme C Black Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Heather McGowan; Olivia R Madreperla; Alexandra L Snyder; Howard F Fine Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Aara Patel; Jane D Hayward; Vijay Tailor; Rodney Nyanhete; Helena Ahlfors; Camila Gabriel; Tommaso B Jannini; Yassir Abbou-Rayyah; Robert Henderson; Ken K Nischal; Lily Islam; Maria Bitner-Glindzicz; Jane Hurst; Leonardo E Valdivia; Mario Zanolli; Mariya Moosajee; John Brookes; Maria Papadopoulos; Peng T Khaw; Thomas Cullup; Lucy Jenkins; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor; Jane C Sowden Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Edwin M Stone; Jeaneen L Andorf; S Scott Whitmore; Adam P DeLuca; Joseph C Giacalone; Luan M Streb; Terry A Braun; Robert F Mullins; Todd E Scheetz; Val C Sheffield; Budd A Tucker Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Peter Y Zhao; Kari Branham; Dana Schlegel; Abigail T Fahim; K Thiran Jayasundera Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Mark B Consugar; Daniel Navarro-Gomez; Emily M Place; Kinga M Bujakowska; Maria E Sousa; Zoë D Fonseca-Kelly; Daniel G Taub; Maria Janessian; Dan Yi Wang; Elizabeth D Au; Katherine B Sims; David A Sweetser; Anne B Fulton; Qin Liu; Janey L Wiggs; Xiaowu Gai; Eric A Pierce Journal: Genet Med Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Keith Nykamp; Michael Anderson; Martin Powers; John Garcia; Blanca Herrera; Yuan-Yuan Ho; Yuya Kobayashi; Nila Patil; Janita Thusberg; Marjorie Westbrook; Scott Topper Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Nikolas Pontikos; Gavin Arno; Neringa Jurkute; Elena Schiff; Rola Ba-Abbad; Samantha Malka; Ainoa Gimenez; Michalis Georgiou; Genevieve Wright; Monica Armengol; Hannah Knight; Menachem Katz; Mariya Moosajee; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man; Anthony T Moore; Michel Michaelides; Andrew R Webster; Omar A Mahroo Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 12.079