| Literature DB >> 36212666 |
Mi Rim Suh1, Jun Hyeong Song1, Yongbum Park1, Seok Hyeon Lee1, Jaeki Ahn1.
Abstract
Median nerve damage caused by trauma is rare, especially after the massage therapy. There have been no reports of median neuropathy in the distal forearm following massage therapy. A 61-year-old man developed paresthesia and numbness in the right hand after two sessions of massage therapy. Electrophysiologic studies, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to localize and confirm the median nerve lesion in the distal forearm. Ultrasound-guided perineural steroid injection and oral pregabalin were administered. At the 1-month follow-up, more than 80% of the sensory symptoms had resolved, and the results of the sensory nerve conduction study and ultrasound showed improvement. Although massage-induced mononeuropathy is uncommon, massage therapy should be performed carefully to avoid complications.Entities:
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; massage; median neuropathy; mononeuropathy; nerve conduction study; ultrasound
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212666 PMCID: PMC9532526 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.959919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Figure 1Ultrasound imaging of (A) left median nerve and (B) right median nerve (arrow). The sonographic findings showed a hypoechoic swelling of the right median nerve at the distal forearm level (4 cm above the distal wrist crease). At this level, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the right median nerve was 0.19 cm2, and that of the left side was 0.09 cm2. (C) At the 1-month follow-up, the CSA of the right median nerve was 0.12 cm2.
Figure 2Magnetic resonance imaging findings of the right median nerve (arrow) in the (A) T2-weighted axial view and (B) T2-weighted sagittal view. Focal thickening and signal change in the right median nerve is observed at the distal radius level.
Nerve conduction study of upper extremities.
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||
| Rt. median nerve | 2.60 | 14.0 | 49.0 | Rt. median nerve (APB) | 3.0 | 54.1 | 14.6/10.7 |
| 3.65 | 18.0 | 15.6 | |||||
| Lt. median nerve | 2.50 | 14.0 | 51.4 | Lt. median nerve (APB) | 2.9 | 55.6 | 15.2/11.7 |
| 3.20 | 18.0 | 46.0 | |||||
| Rt. ulnar nerve | 2.30 | 14.0 | 50.4 | Rt. ulnar nerve (ADM) | 2.6 | 63.8 | 15.2/12.6 |
| Rt. radial nerve | 1.80 | 14.0 | 31.5 | Rt. radial nerve (EIP) | 1.9 | 69.2 | 5.0/4.8 |
|
| |||||||
| Rt. median nerve | 2.50 | 14.0 | 49.5 | Rt. median nerve (APB) | 3.1 | 57.1 | 14.9/11.0 |
| 3.40 | 18.0 | 24.8 | |||||
| Lt. median nerve | 2.40 | 14.0 | 53.5 | Lt. median nerve (APB) | 2.9 | 55.6 | 15.4/11.9 |
| 3.20 | 18.0 | 47.0 | |||||
*Distance between stimulation site and active electrode.
NCS, nerve conduction study; NCV, nerve conduction velocity; Rt, right; APB, abductor pollicis brevis; Lt, left; ADM, abductor digiti minimi; EIP, extensor indicis proprius.
Findings of needle electromyography in right upper extremity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abductor pollicis brevis | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
| Abductor digit minimi | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
| Pronator quaratus | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
| Flexor carpi radialis | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
| Extensor carpi radialis | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
| Biceps brachii | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
| Triceps brachii | Normal | – | Normal | Normal |
IA, insertion activity; ASA, abnormal spontaneous activity; MUAP, motor unit action potential.