| Literature DB >> 36212487 |
Yun Zhang1, Haonan Ning1, Wenyu Zheng1, Jing Liu2, Fuhai Li1, Junfei Chen3.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory infectious complications remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children with hematological malignancies. Knowledge regarding the lung microbiome in aforementioned children is limited.Entities:
Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; children; drug resistance; hematological malignancies; lower respiratory tract infection; lung microbiome; microbial tolerance; unfavorable environment
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212487 PMCID: PMC9533145 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.932709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Comparison of the demographics, clinical course, features, and outcome of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) children with/without hematological malignancies.
| Characteristics | Children with hematological malignancies and sLRTI (N = 16) | Children with sLRTI only (N = 21) | P-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (IQR), years | 4.6 (3.5–7.7) | 3.9 (1.7–8.1) | 0.471 | |
| Weight, median (IQR), kg | 16.8 (14.0–24.0) | 19.0 (10.4–29.5) | 0.923 | |
| Height, median (IQR),cm | 105.5 (98.0–127.3) | 105.0 (85.0–135.0) | 0.581 | |
| Males, n (%) | 10 (62.5) | 9 (42.9) | 0.236 | |
| Malignancy subtype, n (%) | ALL | 12 (75.0) | – | – |
| AML | 2 (12.5) | – | – | |
| B-LBL | 1 (6.25) | – | – | |
| BL | 1 (6.25) | – | – | |
| Course of lower respiratory tract infection before hospitalization, median (IQR), d | 5 (1–15) | 4 (3–11) | 0.805 | |
| Course of antibiotics before hospitalization, median (IQR), d | 3 (1–14) | 7 (0–18) | 0.916 | |
| Course of entire lower respiratory tract infection, median (IQR), d | 31 (19–38) | 13 (11–20) |
| |
| WBC, median (IQR), ×109/L | 3.30 (2.13–21.49) | 7.55 (5.26–13.17) | 0.456 | |
| ANC, median (IQR), ×109/L | 1.42 (0.58–5.92) | 2.79 (1.95–6.75) | 0.059 | |
| RBC, median (IQR), ×1012/L | 2.67 (2.13–3.52) | 4.61 (4.21–4.91) |
| |
| Hb, median (IQR), g/L | 84 (64–113) | 125 (119–132) |
| |
| PLT, median (IQR), ×109/L | 244 (35–310) | 328 (313–416) |
| |
| CRP, median (IQR), mg/L | 15.29 (1.91–81.47) | 2.06 (0.25–14.4) |
| |
| ALT, median (IQR), g/L | 15 (10–45) | 13 (9–22) | 0.421 | |
| LDH, median (IQR), g/l | 303 (237–356) | 335 (292–412) | 0.217 | |
| Positive BALF cultures, n (%) | 1 (6.3) | 4 (19.0) | 0.259 | |
| Positive cultures other than BALF, n (%) | 4 (25.0) | 0 (0) |
| |
| FEV1/FVC, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 106.6 (100.5–115.1), (7) | 108.5 (98.6-113.1), (9) | 0.965 | |
| FEV1, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 90.2 (78.7–102.6), (7) | 85.7 (74.9-94.5), (9) | 0.480 | |
| MEF75, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 73.9 (60.9–83.8), (7) | 69.0 (64.4–95.8), (9) | 0.895 | |
| MEF50, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 68.4 (64.3–99.8), (7) | 70.0 (52.3–100.8), (9) | 0.965 | |
| MEF25, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 71.5 ()58.3–98.8), (7) | 73.5 (52.7–95.0), (9) | 0.895 | |
| MEF75/25, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 70.2 (64.3–101.7), (7) | 71.0 (60.3–98.5), (9) | 0.965 | |
| FVC, ml, median (IQR), (n)** | 90.1 (79.0–95.0), (7) | 80.0 (66.5–93.3), (9) | 0.402 | |
| VT/kg, ml/kg, median (IQR), (n)** | 8.9 (5.8–11.2), (9) | 12.4 (11.1–14.4), (12) |
| |
| tPTEF/tE, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 18.3 (15.7–36.6), (9) | 19.7 (14.0–36.9), (12) | 0.865 | |
| VPEF/VE, %, median (IQR), (n)** | 20.4 (18.9–37.6), (9) | 24.2 (19.6–33.6), (12) | 0.777 | |
| Hospitalization course, median, d | 17.5 (4–52) | 7 (4–14) |
| |
| Death during sLRTI, n (%) | 1 (6.3) | 0 (0) | 0.245 | |
sLRTI, severe lower respiratory tract infection; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myelogenous leukemia; B-LBL, B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma; BL, Burkitt’s lymphoma; WBC, white blood cell count; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; RBC, red blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelet; CRP, C reactive protein; ALT, alanine transaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
*Statistically significant p-values(p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
**Children under 6 years old were only given tidal breath pulmonary function. Children older than 6 years were given a pulmonary function test.
Chemotherapy information of children with hematological malignancies and LRTIs.
| Malignancies subtype (n) | Disease group | Malignancy course/m | Present chemotherapy phase when enrolled | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL (12) | Mediate risk | 5 (42%) | 3 (0.55–20)* | Induction phase | 6 (50%) |
| Consolidation phase | 2 (16.7%) | ||||
| Low risk | 7 (58%) | Maintenance phase | 4 (33.4%) | ||
| AML (2) | Low risk | 2 (100%) | 1/1.5 | Induction phase | 2 (100%) |
| B-LBL (1) | Stage III | 15 | Consolidation phase | ||
| BL (1) | Stage IV | 10 | 3 days after the end of chemotherapy | ||
*Median (IQR).
Figure 1Comparison of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) children with/without hematological malignancies. P = 0.001, < 0.01, feature number of group A(A1-16) was obviously lower than that of group B(B1-21). A1–16 stand for the BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies, while B1–21 stand for the samples of LRTI children without malignancies.
Figure 2Comparison of mutual OTUs of samples from LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. The left figure reflects BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies (Group A); the right figure reflects BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies (Group B). Mutual OTUs (the core of flower) of group A were more than that of group B.
Figure 3Comparison of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies at the phylum/genus level. The bar chart on the left was the comparison at the phylum level, while the bars on the right were at the genus level. Bar A reflects BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; Bar B reflects BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Comparison of α diversity between LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies.
| α diversity | Sum of ranks | P- value* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children with malignancy and sLRTI (N = 20) | Children with sLRTI only (N = 21) | |||
| ACE | 183 | 520 |
| |
| Chao1 | 182 | 521 |
| |
| Simpson* | 184 | 519 |
| |
| Shannon index | 183 | 520 |
| |
| Abundance (phylum level) |
| 459 | 244 |
|
|
| 156 | 547 |
| |
|
| 206 | 497 |
| |
|
| 230 | 473 |
| |
| Abundance (genus level) |
| 472 | 231 |
|
|
| 468 | 235 |
| |
|
| 289 | 414 | 0.660 | |
|
| 293 | 410 | 0.751 | |
|
| 432 | 271 |
| |
|
| 314 | 389 | 0.774 | |
|
| 404 | 299 |
| |
*Comparison of the Simpson index in two groups were eligible for Student’s t-test (p = 0.000, < 0.05), equal with the p-value by the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Statistically significant p-values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Figure 4Rarefaction curve and Shannon index curve between samples of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. Curve A reflects BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; Curve B reflects BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 5Rank abundance curve between samples of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. Curve A reflects BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; Curve B reflects BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies. Width of each curve means the species richness of certain samples; smoothness means the species evenness of certain samples.
Figure 6Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) of samples of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. Dots A reflect BALF samples ofLRTI children with hematological malignancies; Dots B reflect BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 7Box plot of PERMANOVA between samples of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. A mean BALF samples ofLRTI children with hematological malignancies; B mean BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies. Treat 1 means the differences(the basis of maignancies and the correlated conditions) between the two groups.
Figure 8Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic mean analysis. A1–16 mean the BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies, while B1–21 stand for the samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 9Line discriminant analysis effect size and cladogram. A reflect BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; B reflect BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 10BugBase phenotype prediction. A reflect BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; B reflect BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 11KEGG analysis of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. A reflect BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; B reflect BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 12FAPROTAX analysis of LRTI children with/without hematological malignancies. A reflect BALF samples of LRTI children with hematological malignancies; B reflect BALF samples of LRTI children without hematological malignancies.
Figure 13Correlation of hospitalization course and indicators. (A, B) were the correlation of α and β diversity and hospitalization course. (C, D) were the correlation of species and hospitalization course at the phylum level. (E, F) were the correlation of species and hospitalization course at the genus level. The r-value and p-value in Spearman correlation analysis were marked on the top-right corner in each chart. Fitting curves with a negative correlation were in red; fitting curves with a positive correlation were in blue.