Literature DB >> 36212233

Assessment of prevalence and associated factors of intestinal parasite infections among school children at Amber Primary School, Northwest Ethiopia.

Tamiru Getnet1, Tesfa Alemayehu1, Tigist Demeke1, Milkiyas Toru1, Yibeltal Aschale1.   

Abstract

Objective: This study is aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of intestinal parasitic infections among school children at Amber Primary School, Northwest Ethiopia.
Methods: A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Amber Primary School from December 2019 to January 2020. Semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic data and clinical characteristics. Direct wet mount technique was applied for detection and identification of intestinal parasites. Result: A total of 384 participants were included in this study of which 50.3% were males and 65.4% were in the age group 9-12 years. The prevalence of at least one intestinal parasite was 26.8% (n = 103), of which 13.6% (n = 14) were mixed infections. Hymenolepis nana was the most prevalent intestinal parasite (5.2%) followed by Entamoeba histolytica/dispar (4.9%) and hookworm (4.7%). Male children (adjusted odds ratio = 0.624; 95% confidence interval: 0.392-0.993) and those whose mother completed elementary school (adjusted odds ratio = 2.171; 95% confidence interval: 1.012-4.658) were significantly associated with intestinal parasite infections (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Intestinal parasitic infections remained an important health problem among school children in the study area. Appropriate intervention measures should be taken to reduce the burden and related morbidities.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amber; Intestinal parasite; schoolchildren

Year:  2022        PMID: 36212233      PMCID: PMC9536104          DOI: 10.1177/20503121221128134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAGE Open Med        ISSN: 2050-3121


Introduction

Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) caused either by pathogenic helminths or protozoa are the most prevalent in the world mainly in low-income countries like Ethiopia. They are highly prevalent especially among the poor sections of population.[1-3] About 3.5 billion people are infected globally and more than 10.5 million new cases are reported annually. Farmers, institutionalized children, and prisoners are the groups of people at high risk of IPI. In heavy infections, they lead to iron deficiency anemia, vitamin-A deficiency, growth retardation, and organ blockage.[6,7] Hookworm, Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, and Giardia duodenalis are the commonest intestinal parasites causing high morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.[8,9] Like other tropical developing countries, intestinal parasites are widely distributed in Ethiopia due to poverty and climatic factors. Nearly 81 million people live in endemic areas, of which 25.3 million are school-age children. There was high prevalence of helminthic infection in the lower altitudes, Ascaris lumbricoids being the most predominant intestinal parasite in different localities occurring together with Trichuris and hookworm.[11,12] Intensity of infection may be light, moderate, or high depending on the virulence nature of the parasite and host immune status. Commonly, many of the infected persons are asymptomatic at diagnosis and remain undetected, thus difficult to evaluate the burden caused by intestinal parasites. A cross-sectional study in Northern Ethiopia reported that the prevalence of intestinal parasites among school-age children was 29.9%. Unclean fingernail, defecating in the open field, and being barefooted were identified as the determinant factors. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis reported that the pooled prevalence of IPIs in preschool and school Ethiopian children is 48%. Studying the prevalence of IPIs and its correlates is a precondition for designing appropriate intervention strategies. The disease burden is different from place to place and depends on several predisposing factors. Although several studies have been conducted on prevalence and associated factors of IPI in Ethiopia, there are still localities by which epidemiological information is not known. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of IPI and associated factors among school children at Amber Primary School, which is found in Northwest Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2019 to January 2020 at Amber Primary School located in Amber town. Amber is found in Aneded woreda, East Gojjam zone of Amhara region, which is 285 km far from Addis Ababa, capital city of Ethiopia. The town has an annual average temperature ranging from 18°C to 25°C. There are three cluster kebeles surrounding the town, and one governmental primary school, one high school, and one health center in the town. Based on the 2007 national census conducted by Central Statistical Agency (CSA) of Ethiopia, the town and the surrounding kebeles have a total population of 24,717. The town administration has a total population of 5427.

Study population characteristics

All Amber Primary School children were the source population and those students enrolled in the school during the study period were study population. All voluntary children who submitted a stool specimen were included and those taking anti-parasitic medication were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling method

The sample size was calculated using single population proportion formula N = Z2 p (1 − p)/d2, where N = minimum number of sample size, Z2 = standard value, d = marginal error; at 95% confidence interval (95% CI), Z = 1.96 and d = 5%. Since no report was recorded for infection prevalence of intestinal parasites in the study area, p = 50%. Therefore, N = (1.96)2 × 0.5 (1−0.5)/(0.05)2 = 384.

Sampling technique

To select the children, the students were first stratified according to their educational level (grade 1 to grade 8). A quota was then allocated for each grade with proportional allocation according to the number of students in each grade. Finally, the participating children were selected using systematic random sampling technique by using class roster as a sampling frame.

Data collection and laboratory methods

Sociodemographic data collection

A semi-structured questionnaire addressing all socio-demographic data and the risk factors was self-made in English version. It was then translated into the local language of the area (Amharic). The questionnaires used in this study were pre-tested in 5% (n = 19) of population for validation. Finally, interview was conducted by trained data collectors. Their parents/legal guardians were interviewed for questions that are not possible for lower grade (grades 1 and 2) children.

Stool sample collection, processing, and examination

Stool samples were collected into dry, clean, and leak-proof container after appropriate instruction and checked visually for quantity, color, consistency, and appearance. Direct wet mount technique was applied for detection and identification of intestinal parasites. Three smear preparations for each participant were examined carefully and their result is recorded at Amber Health Center Laboratory. Presence of parasite in one of the three smear preparations was reported as positive and absence of parasite from all three smear preparations was reported as negative.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, 2011) software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for statistical analysis to show any significant association between dependent and independent variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of study participants

A total of 384 participants were included in this study, of which 50.3% were males and 65.4% were in the age group 9–12 years. Majority of them (62.5%) were in grades 1–4, and 74.7% of participants drank tap water. Majority of them (70.8%) had a family size of five to seven people and 59.4% had no history of previous infection (Table 1).
Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristic of study participant at Amber Primary School, 2020.

VariablesCategoryFrequencyPercentage
SexMale19350.3
Female19149.7
Age group in years5–86516.9
9–1225165.4
13–166817.7
Grade level1–424062.5
5–814437.5
Occupation of household headGovernmental employee6617.2
Farmer15640.6
Merchant10828.1
others5414
Educational status of household headUnable to read and write15640.6
Elementary school10928.4
High school6216.1
College and above5714.8
Family size4 and below9725.3
5–727270.8
8 and above153.9
Source of waterTap28774.7
Spring9524.7
Other20.5
History of previous infectionYes15640.6
No22859.4
Sociodemographic characteristic of study participant at Amber Primary School, 2020.

Prevalence rate of intestinal parasite species

The prevalence of at least one intestinal parasite was 26.8% (95% CI: 22.7–31.3; males 11.4%, females 15.4%). Overall, 23.2% (n = 89) were single infections and 3.6% (n = 14) were mixed infections. All mixed infections were double infections. A total of six intestinal parasites (two species of protozoa and four species of helminth) were identified. The ratio of protozoa to helminth infection was approximately 1:1.6 in single infections. Highest prevalence rate was observed in Hymenolepis nana followed by E. histolytica/dispar and hookworm. The highest case of double infection was noticed in G. duodenalis and E. histolytica/dispar (six cases) followed by hookworm and E. histolytica/dispar (three cases; Table 2).
Table 2.

Prevalence rate of intestinal parasite species identified in Amber Primary School, 2020.

Intestinal parasite speciesFrequency (N)Percentage (%)
Mono infections H. nana 205.2
E. histolytica/dispar 194.9
Hookworm184.7
Giardia duodenalis 153.9
A. lumbricoides 133.4
E. vermicularis 41.1
Total8923.2
Double infectionsA. lumbricoides+G. duodenalis20.5
A. lumbricoid+E. histolytica/dispar10.3
Hookworm +G. duodenale10.3
Hookworm +E. histolytica/dispar30.7
E. histolytica/dispar+G. duodenale61.5
Hookworm + H.nana10.3
Total143.6
Overall total10326.8
Prevalence rate of intestinal parasite species identified in Amber Primary School, 2020.

Prevalence rate of IPIs by sex and age

Females (30.9%) had higher parasite prevalence than males (22.8%). Highest parasite infection was observed in the age group 5–8 years (27.7%) and 9–12 years (27.1%; Table 3).
Table 3.

Prevalence rate of intestinal parasite infections by sex and age in Amber Primary School, 2020.

CategoryPositive (%)Negative (%)
SexMale44 (22.8)149 (77.2)
Female59 (30.9)132 (69.1)
Age group5–818 (27.7)47 (72.3)
9–1268 (27.1)183 (72.9)
13–1617 (25)51 (75)
Total103 (26.8)281 (73.2)
Prevalence rate of intestinal parasite infections by sex and age in Amber Primary School, 2020.

Factors associated with intestinal parasites

Potential variables that showed a p value of <0.25 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model to control confounding factors (Table 4). Six variables (sex, mother’s educational status, family size, grade level, nail trimming, and hand washing before eating) were entered into the backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression model (Table 5).
Table 4.

Univariate analysis of factors associated with intestinal parasite infection at Amber Primary School, 2020.

VariablesCategoryResultUnivariate analysisp valueChi-square
PositiveNegativeCOR (95% CI)
SexMale441490.661 (0.419–1.042)0.0743.211
Female591321.00
Age group in years5–818471.149 (0.531–2.487)0.7250.151
9–12681831.115 (0.602–2.063)0.729
13–1617511.00
Grade level1–4711691.470 (0.909–2.378)0.1162.528
5–8321121.00
Mother’s educational statusUnable to read and write411151.337 (0.644–2.774)0.4354.862
Elementary school37721.927 (0.910–4.080)0.087
High school13490.995 (0.411–2.405)0.991
College and above12451.00
Family size4 and below27701.000.039
5–7692030.881 (0.523–1.484)0.635
8 and above782.269 (0.750–6.865)0.147
Contact with domestic animalsYes431320.809 (0.513–1.277)0.3630.833
No601491.00
Nail trimmingYes37811.001.752
No662000.722 (0.448–1.165)0.183
Shoe wearing habitAlways491291.000.104
Sometimes521470.931 (0.590–1.470)0.760
Never251.053 (0.198–5.608)0.952
Hand washing before eatingAlways792161.002.372
Sometimes14490.781 (0.409–1.493)0.455
Never10161.709 (0.744–3.923)0.206
Hand washing after defecationAlways16501.000.490
Sometimes511421.122 (0.587–2.145)0.727
Never36891.264 (0.638–2.503)0.501

COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with intestinal parasite infections at Amber Primary School, 2020.

VariablesCategoryResultMultivariate analysisp value
PositiveNegativeAOR (95% CI)
SexMale441490.624 (0.392–0.993)0.047*
Female591321.00
Grade level1–4711691.376 (0.839–2.258)0.206
5–8321121.00
Mother’s educational statusUnable to read and write411151.489 (0.710–3.122)0.292
Elementary school37722.171 (1.012–4.658)0.046*
High school13491.125 (0.460–2.752)0.796
College and above12451.00
Family size4 and below27701.00
5–7692030.812 (0.464–1.421)0.466
8 and above781.856 (0.578–5.957)0.299
Nail trimmingYes37811.00
No662000.787 (0.467–1.327)0.369
Hand washing before eatingAlways792161.00
Sometimes14490.793 (0.395–1.589)0.513
Never10161.501 (0.5598–3.771)0.387

AOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

p < .05.

Univariate analysis of factors associated with intestinal parasite infection at Amber Primary School, 2020. COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with intestinal parasite infections at Amber Primary School, 2020. AOR: adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. p < .05. Two variables (sex and mother’s educational status) were significantly associated with IPIs (p < 0.05). Males were 0.624 times (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.624, 95% CI: 0.392–0.993) less likely to be infected by intestinal parasites than females. Children whose mother completed elementary school were 2.171 times (AOR = 2.171, 95% CI: 1.012–4.658) more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites than others (Table 5). The prevalence of intestinal parasite was not significantly associated with age group, grade level, family size, nail trimming, wearing shoes, contact with animals, and hand washing before eating and after defecation (p > 0.05).

Discussion

Understanding the status of IPIs and related factors in different setting is vital to identify high-risk groups and design suitable intervention tools. In this study, the prevalence of at least one intestinal parasite was 26.8%. This finding is in line with a study conducted in Delo-Mena district, South Eastern Ethiopia (26.6%), Birbir town, Southern Ethiopia (27.1%), and Northern Ethiopia (29.9%). However, it is higher than a study conducted in Harbu Town, Northeast Ethiopia (21.5%), and lower than a studies conducted in Sasiga District, Southwest Ethiopia (62.4%), Jawi Northwest Ethiopia (57.88%), Bahir Dar, Ethiopia (65.5%), and Southern Ethiopia (67.7%) Homesha District, Benishangul-Gumuz Region (35.4%), Gurage Zone of Ethiopia (40.2%), Aksum town (44.6%), and Adigrat town (50.8%). A molecular study among diarrheic children in Gabon reported an overall IPI prevalence of 61%, Hymenolepis species and Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum being the most common parasites (31% and 19%, respectively). The difference in prevalence rate might be due to difference in level of knowledge and practice on intestinal parasite, hygienic status of school children, and diagnostic tools used to detect the parasite. Of the total 26.8% infected, 23.2% were single infections and 3.6% were mixed infections. From this mixed infections, all students had only double infection. A study conducted in Aksum town showed a prevalence rate of 37.6% single and 7% mixed infections among positive cases. The present finding is different from a study conducted in Delgi, North Gondar by which 13.6% were single infection and 66.2% were mixed infection; from this mixed infection, the majority of the students had double infection 43.9%. The difference might be due to several environmental, social, and geographical factors. About six species of intestinal parasites were identified, of which H. nana (5.2%) was the predominant parasite followed by E. histolytica/dispar (4.9%), hookworm (4.7%), G. duodenalis (3.9%), A. lumbricoides (3.4%), and E. vermicularis (1.1%). A study conducted in Delo-Mena district, South Eastern Ethiopia and Harbu Town, Northeast Ethiopia showed the dominance of E. histolytica/dispar followed by H. nana.[16,18] Another study conducted in Delgi, North Gondar demonstrated that the most prevalent intestinal parasites identified were A. lumbricoides, G. duodenalis, E. histolytica/dispar, S. mansoni, and hookworm. A study done in Adigrat town also showed that frequently encountered intestinal parasites were A. lumbricoides (19.1%), hookworm (10.03%), Strongyloides stercoralis (7.77%), E. histolytica (4.5%), Enterobius vermicularis, (3.56%), T. trichiura (3.24%), and G. duodenalis (2.29%). In this study, females (30.9%) had higher parasite prevalence than males (22.8%) and highest IPI was observed in the age groups 5–8 years (27.7%) and 9–12 years (27.1%). The reason is due to the fact that females are more engaged in food preparation and water-fetching activities and lower age children have a habit eating and/or drinking contaminated food/water that might increase the risk of acquiring parasite feco-orally and/or via skin penetration. This is in line with a study conducted in Adigrat town by which higher infection prevalence was seen in females (52.9%) than in males (49.1%) and the highest IPI was observed in age group 10–12 (54.8%). IPI was significantly associated with sex (being male) and mother’s educational status (elementary school; p < 0.05). Males were less likely to acquire infection than females. A study done in Southern Ethiopia revealed that IPIs have a statistically significant association with the mother’s educational status. Another study conducted in Chencha town, South Ethiopia demonstrated that IPIs had statistically significant association with the educational status of the household heads, absence of washing facility, home cleanliness, and type of latrine.

Limitations of the study

The study involved participants from one school only, which compromise generalizability of findings. We have applied direct wet mount to detect intestinal parasites, which might underestimate the prevalence. We are unable to differentiate between E. histolytica and E. dispar due to inaccessibility of molecular diagnostic tools.

Conclusion and recommendation

The prevalence of at least one intestinal parasite was 26.8% and it is significantly associated with sex of children and their mother’s educational status. Appropriate intervention measures targeting school children should be implemented to prevent the burden imposed by IPI and related morbidities. School-based intestinal parasite screening and treatment and improvement of environmental sanitation practice are highly recommended, which can be achieved by the involvement of health care providers, the community, and religious leaders. Click here for additional data file. Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-smo-10.1177_20503121221128134 for Assessment of prevalence and associated factors of intestinal parasite infections among school children at Amber Primary School, Northwest Ethiopia by Tamiru Getnet, Tesfa Alemayehu, Tigist Demeke, Milkiyas Toru and Yibeltal Aschale in SAGE Open Medicine
  17 in total

Review 1.  Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks - An update 2011-2016.

Authors:  Artemis Efstratiou; Jerry E Ongerth; Panagiotis Karanis
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Screening for intestinal parasites in recently arrived children from East Africa.

Authors:  J E Rice; S A Skull; C Pearce; N Mulholland; G Davie; J R Carapetis
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.954

3.  Intestinal Parasitic Infections and Nutritional Status among Primary School Children in Delo-mena District, South Eastern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Begna Tulu; Solomon Taye; Yohannes Zenebe; Eden Amsalu
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.012

4.  Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among students at Dona Berber primary school, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tamirat Hailegebriel
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Soil-Transmitted Helminths And Other Intestinal Parasites Among Schoolchildren In Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tilahun Eyamo; Mekonnen Girma; Tsegaye Alemayehu; Zufan Bedewi
Journal:  Res Rep Trop Med       Date:  2019-10-24

6.  Assessment of the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis and associated risk factors among primary school children in Chencha town, Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Ashenafi Abossie; Mohammed Seid
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The Impact of Intestinal Parasitic Infections on the Nutritional Status of Rural and Urban School-Aged Children in Nigeria.

Authors:  Kenneth N Opara; Nsima I Udoidung; Dominic C Opara; Okpok E Okon; Evelyn U Edosomwan; Anietie J Udoh
Journal:  Int J MCH AIDS       Date:  2012

8.  Molecular prevalence of intestinal parasites infections in children with diarrhea in Franceville, Southeast of Gabon.

Authors:  Sandrine Lydie Oyegue-Liabagui; Nal Kennedy Ndjangangoye; Lady Charlene Kouna; Gwladys Mirlande Lekolo; Franck Mounioko; Sylvie Kwedi Nolna; Jean Bernard Lekana-Douki
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection among children under 5 years of age at Dessie Referral Hospital: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Daniel Gebretsadik; Yeshi Metaferia; Abdurahaman Seid; Genet Molla Fenta; Alemu Gedefie
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-10-29

10.  Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections and Associated Risk Factors among the First-Cycle Primary Schoolchildren in Sasiga District, Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Baye Sitotaw; Wakgari Shiferaw
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2020-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.