| Literature DB >> 36212067 |
Wenfeng Hao1, Hao Hao2, Humaira Kanwal2, Shiping Jiang2.
Abstract
Microcapsule self-healing technology is an effective scheme to improve the durability of cementitious composites. In this paper, the compressive properties of microcapsule-based self-healing cementitious composites after freeze-thaw cycles were studied using acoustic emission (AE), and the changes in AE characteristics, compressive strength, mass loss rate, and electric flux of microcapsule-based self-healing cementitious composites with different microcapsule contents and freeze-thaw cycles were studied. The results show that if the content of the microcapsule is appropriate, with the increase in the number of freeze-thaw cycles, the AE hits will generally increase first and then decrease, and the early AE events will also decrease. Because of the different contents of microcapsules, the improvement effect and defect effect change dynamically with the number of freeze-thaw cycles, which is also reflected in the dynamic process of compressive strength. After 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the compressive strength of self-healing cementitious composite samples with 5% content of microcapsules and 3% content of microcapsules is the highest. The changes in mass loss rate and electric flux are similar to the AE characteristic parameters, which further verifies the results of AE. The research results of this paper provide experimental data and experimental methods for the engineering application of microcapsule self-healing cement-based composites in cold areas.Entities:
Keywords: acoustic emission; compressive properties; freeze-thaw cycles; frost resistance; microcapsules; self-healing cementitious composites
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212067 PMCID: PMC9537771 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.940184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1Damage after freeze-thaw cycles. (A) After 25 freeze-thaw cycles (B) After 50 freeze-thaw cycles (C) After 75 freeze-thaw cycles (D) After 100 freeze-thaw cycles.
FIGURE 2Compressive strength. (A) Compressive strength vs. content curves (B) Compressive strength vs. freeze thaw cycle curves
FIGURE 3AE characteristics of samples after 25 freeze-thaw cycles. (A) 0% Content (B) 3% Content (C) 1% Content (D) 5% Content (E) 7% Content.
FIGURE 4AE characteristics of samples after 50 freeze-thaw cycles. (A) 0% Content (B) 3% Content (C) 1% Content (D) 5% Content (E) 7% Content.
FIGURE 5AE characteristics of samples after 75 freeze-thaw cycles. (A) 0% Content (B) 1% Content (C) 3% Content (D) 5% Content (E) 7% Content.
FIGURE 6AE characteristics of samples after 100 freeze-thaw cycles.
FIGURE 7AE hits.
FIGURE 8Mass loss rate of each freeze-thaw cycle.
FIGURE 9Electric flux after different freeze-thaw cycles.