| Literature DB >> 36212064 |
Yingshu Guo1, Li Sun2, Yajing Wang2, Qianqian Wang2, Dan Jing1, Shiwei Liu1.
Abstract
The progress of nanotechnology enables us to make use of the special properties of materials on the nanoscale and open up many new fields of biomedical research. Among them, thermosensitive nanomaterials stand out in many biomedical fields because of their "intelligent" behavior in response to temperature changes. However, this article mainly reviews the research progress of thermosensitive nanomaterials, which are popular in biomedical applications in recent years. Here, we simply classify the thermally responsive nanomaterials according to the types of polymers, focusing on the mechanisms of action and their advantages and potential. Finally, we deeply investigate the applications of thermosensitive nanomaterials in drug delivery, tissue engineering, sensing analysis, cell culture, 3D printing, and other fields and probe the current challenges and future development prospects of thermosensitive nanomaterials.Entities:
Keywords: bioanalysis; nanomaterials; polymer; sol–gel transition; temperature sensitive
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212064 PMCID: PMC9532752 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.946183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1Synthetic mechanism, types, properties of thermosensitive nanomaterials, and their applications in the biomedicine field.
List of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on polysaccharide.
| Thermosensitive nanomaterial | Synthetic mechanism | LCST | Gel time | Superiority | Application field | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS/β-GP | Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and hydrophobic action | 29–37°C | 3.3 min | High biological stabiliy and irreversible gel | Antibacterial eye ophthalmic dressings and on-demand drug release |
|
| CS/GP/Col | Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and hydrophobic action | 36–38°C | 60–80 s | High porosity, high degradation rate, and rapid gelation | ADSCs culture |
|
| CS/HPC/Col-GP | Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and hydrophobic action | 16–19°C | 2min | Good biocompatibility | Endoscopic mucosal dissection gelation and postoperative wound injection |
|
| MC | One-pot synthesis | 35–45°C | 2 min | Reversible gel transition, high biological activity | Bone regeneration |
|
| MC-cTOCN-MMC | EDC/NHS-chemical coupling reaction | 37°C | 30 s | High drug loading, low cytotoxicity, resist adhesion, biodegradability, and excellent mechanical properties | Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion |
|
| CS/HPMC/Gl | Hydrophobic action | 32–36°C | 10 min | Good liquidity, biodegradability, low cytotoxicity, and slow-releasing potential | Biomedical field |
|
| PF-127/HPMC | Hydrogen bonding | 31.8–34.2°C | 34.7–39.3 s | Excellent gel property, high adhesion, and sustained release | Treatment of postoperative eye inflammation |
|
FIGURE 2Representative studies of temperature-sensitive nanomaterials based on polysaccharide. (A) Cell-free hydrogel system based on a tissue-specific extracellular matrix for in situ adipose tissue regeneration. (B) Viscosity and (C) AFM-based force-distance curves of sECM-MC hydrogels. Reprinted with permission from Kim J. S. et al (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.
List of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on Amide.
| Thermosensitive nanomaterial | Synthetic mechanism | LCST | Superiority | Application field | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-NIBIm | Free radical polymerization | 38–42°C | Extraordinary protein capture and release ability, low cytotoxicity | Drugs and the negatively charged molecules of DNA delivery system |
|
| p (NIPAM-co-AM) | Ligand exchange method | 39–41.5°C | Good dispersion, good biocompatibility, and reversible thermal response | Drug controlled release |
|
| Alginate-g-PNIPAAm | Atom transfer radical polymerization | 35°C | Good biocompatibility, biodegradability, low cytotoxicity, chelability, and easily chemically modified | Hydrophobic anticancer drugs of intelligent delivery system |
|
| HA-ss-PNIPAAm | Two-step amidation reaction | 36.9°C | Size controllability, high tumor targeting, and low immunogenicity | Hydrophobic anticancer drug delivery |
|
| P (DEAAm-co- MBAAm-co-MAA) | Free radical polymerization | 33.4°C | High porosity and hole interconnection | Tissue engineering scaffold |
|
FIGURE 3Representative studies of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on amide. (A) Temperature-dependent nanoparticle dynamics in poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) gels. Reprinted with permission from Parrish et al. (2018) Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society (B) Temperature responsiveness of the three-component nanohybrid (Au@mSi@P). Reprinted with permission from Baek et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society (C) FTIR spectrum of P(NIPAM-co-AM) temperature-sensitive nanomaterial. Reprinted with permission from Chang et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. (D) In vitro anticancer activities were evaluated using the MTT assays of thermoresponsive hydrogel formed by alginate-g-poly (N-isopropylacrylamide). Reprinted with permission from Liu M. et al (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society (E) PNIPAm-POSS copolymer volume change during thermal cycles. Reprinted with permission from Romo-Uribe and Albanil 2019. Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. (F) (a) Synthesis of glycidyl-functional poly (N,N-diethylacrylamide-co-glycidyl methacrylate) copolymers via free radical copolymerization and the design of enzyme–polymer nanoconjugate with α-chymotrypsin: (b) thermoresponsive behavior of P (DEAAm-co-GMA) copolymers. Reprinted with permission from Kasza et al. (2021). Copyright © 2021 Polymers. (G) Elucidation of temperature responsive phase transition (a) and viscoelastic properties (G’and G″) (b) of PVCL-g-CNC copolymer influenced by temperature change. Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al. (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 4Representative studies of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on polyester. (A) Componential formulation and proposed delivery of the thermo-nanogel system. Reprinted with permission from du Toit et al. (2021). Copyright © 2021 Pharmaceutics. (B) Structure and 1H-NMR spectrum of PCEC copolymer. Reprinted with permission from Qu et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. (C) Thermosensitive hydrogel with a protoporphyrin core based on a PEG and PCL copolymer (PCL-PEG-PPOR-PEG-PCL) as a potential visible biomedical implant. Reprinted with permission from Dong et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. (D) New class of polylactide (PLA)-based block copolymers with thermoresponsive poly (vinyl ether) [poly (VE)] were precisely synthesized via successive living cationic polymerization of VE and ring-opening polymerization of lactide. Reprinted with permission from Seki et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. (E) Schematic diagram of the process of temperature-induced physical gelation of the amphiphilic block copolymers. Reprinted with permission from Shi et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 Scientific Reports. (F) Reversible sol–gel phase transition of ERT@HMSNs/gel composite. Reprinted with permission from Zhou et al. (2020). Copyright © Advanced Science. (G) Schematic diagram of the sol–gel transition of BAB type PLGA–PEG–PLGA triblock copolymer aqueous solution in response to temperature. Reprinted with permission from El-Zaafarany et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 Pharmaceutics. (H) Storage stability of Col/Tra/Gel in 0 and 30 days at 4°C observed by the CD spectrogram. Reprinted with permission from Pan et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 Drug Delivery. (I) H&E staining of surrounding tissues of PLGA–PEG–PLGA. Reprinted with permissio from Liu Y. et al (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. (J) Phase diagrams of the aqueous solutions of the copolymer mixtures with the indicated mix proportions. Reprinted with permissio from Chen X. et al (2019). Copyright © 2019 Theranostics. (K) FTIR (a) and 1H NMR (b) spectra of PCLA–PEG–PCLA triblock copolymer PCLA–PEG–PCLA. Reprinted with permission from Li T. et al (2020). Copyright © 2020 Drug Delivery.
List of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on polyester.
| Thermosensitive nanomaterial | Synthetic mechanism | LCST | Gel Time | Superiority | Application field | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEG–PCL–PEG | Double emulsion method | 32–45°C | -- | Good biocompatibility and high hemolytic | Prevention of neovascularization, ophthalmic disease, and tumor treatment |
|
| P(CL-co-TOSUO)- PEG-P(CL-co- TOSUO) | Ring-opening polymerization | 24°C | -- | Biodegradability, operability, good dispersibility, convenient preparation, and diversified degradation mechanisms | Drug delivery and tissue engineering |
|
| PCL–PEG–PCL | Ring-opening polymerization | 33°C | -- | Good biocompatibility, support conditions for cell growth | Spinal fusion disease treatment |
|
| PCL–PEG-–PPOR–PEG–PCL | Ring-opening polymerization | 29–37°C | 1 min | Injectability, good biocompatibility, and non-invasive | Adhesion prevention, drug and gene delivery, tissue regeneration, and visual biomedical implants |
|
| PDLLA–PEG– PDLLA | Ring-opening polymerization | 35–37°C | 50–60 s | Injectability, reversible gel transition, low cytotoxicity, good inflammation, and reduce postoperative adhesion | Cancer treatment, sustained drug delivery, tissue regeneration, and wound dressings |
|
| CO2H-PDLLA-PEG-PDLLA-CO2H/NH2-PDLLA-PEG-NH2 | Ring opening reaction, coupling reaction, and hydrogen bonding | 32–39°C | <1 min | Good biocompatibility, biodegradability, excellent gel property, and mechanical strength | Combination therapy of tumor and drug delivery |
|
| PLGA–PEG–PLGA | Ring-opening polymerization | 31–37°C | <1 min | Reversible gel transition, injectability, biodegradability, and low cytotoxicity | Protein/peptide drug delivery, local tumor therapy, and ophthalmic drug delivery |
|
| PCLA–PEG–PCLA | Ring-opening polymerization | 37°C | -- | Biodegradability, good biocompatibility, long persistence | Intra-articular sustained administration and local drug release |
|
FIGURE 5Representative studies of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on polyether. (A) Composite system of graphene oxide and polypeptide thermogel as an injectable 3D scaffold for adipogenic differentiation of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Reprinted with permission from Patel et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. (B) Temperature-dependent reversible sol−gel−sol transition of PEG/P (EEO2LG) hydrogels and the principal characteristics of the PEG/P (EEO2LG) hydrogels. Reprinted with permission from Zhao et al. (2021). Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. (C) Peptidic monodisperse PEG “combs” with fine-tunable LCST and multiple imaging modalities. Reprinted with permission from Zhu et al. (2019). Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. (D) Quantitative characterization of thermal sensitivity of injectable self-healing hydrogel with antimicrobial and antifouling properties. Reprinted with permission from Li et al. (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. (E) Transmittance curves of various concentrations of PPG diacrylate in water. Reprinted with permission from Cheng et al. (2017). Copyright © 2017 Polymer Chemistry. (F) (a) Transmittance change as a function of temperature for different concentrations of BU–PPG in aqueous solution. (b) Plot of LCST values vs. concentration of aqueous BU–PPG solution. Reprinted with permission from Gebeyehu et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. (G) Tube inverting and gelation time tests allowed the investigation of the effects of particle loading on the gelation of CHP407-based sol–gel systems. Reprinted with permission from Pontremoli et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 Chemical Engineering Journal. (H) Thermo-responsive poly (ε-caprolactone)-poly (ethylene/propylene glycol) copolymers as injectable hydrogels for cell therapies. Reprinted with permission from Brewer et al. (2020). Copyright © 2020 Polymers. (I) Novel hydrogel nanoparticles with dual triggerable release properties based on fibrous structural proteins (Keratin) and thermoresponsive copolymers (Pluronic). Reprinted with permission from Ghaffari et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. (J) α,ω-diphenylalanine-end-capping of PEG–PPG–PEG polymers changes the micelle morphology and enhances stability of the thermogel. Reprinted with permission from Kim H. A. et al (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.
List of thermosensitive nanomaterials based on polyether.
| Thermosensitive nanomaterial | Synthetic mechanism | LCST | Gel Time | Superiority | Application field | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC/4-arm PEG-CHO | Schiff base reaction | 37°C | 60–600s |
| Alternative scaffold for meniscus tissue engineering |
|
| GO/PEG–PA | Ring-opening polymerization | 37°C | -- | Mild gel forming condition | 3D cell culture |
|
| PEG/P(EEO2LG) | Ring-opening polymerization | 37°C | 10–70s | Rapid and reversible gel transition and good biocompatibility | 3D cell culture |
|
| M-PEG | Solid phase peptide synthesis | 10–62°C | -- | Availability, good biocompatibility, versatility, adjustable LCST, and biodegradability | Slow controlled drug delivery and traceable imaging |
|
| PEG–PMETA–PEG | Reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization | 18°C | -- | Reversible gel transition, self-healing and antimicrobial and antifouling properties | Implanted biomaterials and bioengineering |
|
| BA–PPG | One-step synthesis | 33–56°C | -- | Controllable physical property, simple manufacture, low cost, high efficiency, and versatility | Biomedical imaging and drug delivery |
|
| PEG–PPG–PEG | Nucleophilic substitution reaction | 28–37°C | -- | High hydrophilicity and good biological stability | Cell culture and long-term drug administration |
|
FIGURE 6Representative studies of thermosensitive nanomaterials in drug delivery. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of D-PPy@PNA nanogels and D-PPy@PNA nanogels based in situ forming hydrogels for synergistic photothermal-chemotherapy. Reprinted with permission from Geng et al. (2020). Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. (B) Illustration of MagNanoGels synthesis and remotely controlled drug delivery under AMF. Reprinted with permission from Cazares-Cortes et al. (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of NIR-triggered DOX release from CET-DOX-CMNP-TSLs. Reprinted with permission from Dorjsuren et al. (2020). Copyright © 2020 International Journal of Nanomedicine. (D) Mode of action by which MC-T-DOX effectively and specifically improves tumor blood perfusion and drug delivery in pancreatic cancer. Reprinted with permission from Wei et al. (2020b). Copyright © 2020 Advance Science. (E) Schematic illustration of the long-acting antidiabetic formulation using injectable hydrogel. Reprinted with permission from Chen et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. (F) Injectable ternary nanocomplex hydrogel for long-term chemical drug/gene dual delivery. Reprinted with permission from Kim et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. (G) Thermosensitive poloxamer 407 (P407) hydrogels were evaluated as slow release system for optimizing CTLA-4 therapy. Reprinted with permission from Chung et al. (2020). Copyright © 2020 Journal of Controlled Release.
FIGURE 7Representative studies of thermosensitive nanomaterials in tissue engineering and sensing analysis. (A) Poly (N-Isopropyl-acrylamide)/poly (γ-glutamic acid) thermo-sensitive hydrogels loaded with superoxide dismutase for wound dressing application. Reprinted with permission from Dong et al. (2020). Copyright © 2020 International Journal of Nanomedicine. (B) Scheme of thermo-sensitive bioadhesive KGF-EPL-HP hydrogel for injured uterus. Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. (2017). Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. (C) Thermoresponsive hydrogel gelling in situ at body temperature was administered locally into the fistula tract of a pig. Reprinted with permission from Silva et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. (D) Graphical representation of CNP assembles into hybrid nanoparticle. Reprinted with permission from Wang et al. (2020). Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. (E) Multifunctional conductive hydrogel/thermochromic elastomer hybrid fibers with core–shell segmental configuration for wearable strain and temperature sensors. Reprinted with permission from Chen J. et al (2020). Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. (F) PPBN-hydrogel sensor for a flexible touch keyboard and wearable phonatory-recognition platform. Reprinted with permission from Ge et al. (2020). Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 8Representative studies of thermosensitive nanomaterials in cell culture and 3D printing. (A) Schematic illustration of coating the surface of a cell culture plate using HGC and the process of spheroid formation on an HGC-coated plate. Reprinted with permission from Cho et al. (2016). Copyright © 2016 NPG Asia Materials. (B) 3D fibroblast growth inside interlinked macroporous microgel scaffolds. Reprinted with permission from Rommel et al. (2022). Copyright © 2022 Advance Science. (C) Histological analysis of cartilage regeneration. Reprinted with permission from Guo J. et al (2022). Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. (D) Temperature responsive swelling of 3D printed PNIPAAm hydrogel structure (b) and (c) reversible temperature-dependent swelling/shrinkage of PNIPAAm hydrogel. Reprinted with permission from Han et al. (2018). Copyright © 2018 Scientific Reports. (E) Characterization of 3D printing of orthogonally growing bilayer structures of hydrogels with programmed motions. Reprinted with permissio from Arslan et al. (2019) Copyright © 2018 Advance Science.