| Literature DB >> 36212046 |
Shiqi Ma1, Haipeng Huang2, Zhen Zhong1, Haizhu Zheng1, Mengyuan Li1, Lin Yao1, Bin Yu3, Hongfeng Wang2.
Abstract
Background: As a non-pharmacological therapy, acupuncture has significant efficacy in treating Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) compared to pharmacological therapies. In recent years, advances in neuroimaging techniques have provided new perspectives to elucidate the central mechanisms of acupuncture for MCI. Many acupuncture brain imaging studies have found significant improvements in brain function after acupuncture treatment of MCI, but the underlying mechanisms of brain regions modulation are unclear. Objective: A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of MCI patients treated with acupuncture was conducted to summarize the effects of acupuncture on the modulation of MCI brain regions from a neuroimaging perspective.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; brain regions modulation; functional magnetic resonance imaging; meta-analysis; mild cognitive impairment
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212046 PMCID: PMC9540390 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.914049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.702
Figure 1Flowchart of literature selection.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of included studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. ( | Longitudinal study | MCI (36, 16/20) | MA (36) | MA: 64.96 ± 3.22 | / | MMSE: 24.61 ± 1.73; | Head: DU20 (1), BG13 (2), GB20 (2);Foot: LR3 (2), SP3 (2), KI3 (2);Abdomen: RN4;Hand: HT7 (2); Leg: ST40 (2), BL58 (2) | MA: uniform reinforcing-reducing method; 40 min/time, 6 times/w, for 4 weeks. |
| Shan et al. ( | Cross sectional | MCI (14, 6/8); HC(14, 6/8) | RA: MCI(8), HC(14); SA: MCI (6) | RA: 66.38 ± 10.97; SA: 67.83 ± 6.01; HC: 66.07 ± 5.78 | RA: 10.63 ± 3.54; SA: 11.00 ± 3.16; HC: 11.00 ± 4.52 | •MMSE: RA: 25.38 ± 1.30, SA: 25.67 ± 2.34; HC: 28.00 ± 1.41 | Foot: LR3 (2); Hand: LI4 (2) | MA: needles are 0.3 mm in diameter, 25 mm long and 2 cm deep;rotated continuously (±180°, 60 times/min); 3 min; SA: 10 mm next to LR3 and Hegu; SA and HC needle specifications and treatment time are the same as MA. |
| Jia et al. ( | Cross sectional | MCI (8, 2/6); HC (15, 8/7) | RA: MCI (8); SA: MCI (8); HC (15) | MCI: 74.1 ± 7.8; HC: 70.2 ± 7.1 | MCI: 12.5 ± 3; HC: 11.4 ± 4.2 | •MMSE: MCI: 27.0 ± 2.3; HC: 29.2 ± 1.3 | Foot: KI3 (2) | RA: needles are 0.25 mm in diameter, 40 mm long and 2 cm deep 1 min, continuous rotation, right then left, at a frequency of 2 Hz for 60 s; SA: 25 mm directly above KI3 as a sham control, and the rest was the same as RA. |
| Liu et al. ( | Cross sectional | MCI (12, 1/11); HC(12, 4/8) | MA: MCI (12), HC (12) | MCI: 59.3 ± 3.3; HC: 60.6 ± 5.8 | MCI: 10.5 ± 1.8; HC: 10.6 ± 2.06 | •MMSE: MCI: 26.4 ± 0.9, HC: 29.8 ± 0.4 | Foot: KI3 (2) | MA: needle is 0.2 mm in diameter, 40 mm long and 1-2 cm deep; rotated continuously (±180°, 60 times/ min), 3 min; HC and MA operate in the same way. |
| Wang et al. ( | Cross sectional | MCI (8, 3/5); HC (14, 6/8) | MA: MCI (8); HC (14) | MCI: 66.37 ± 10.9; HC: 66.07 ± 5.78 | / | •MMSE; MCI: 25.37 ± 1.30, HC: 28.00 ± 1.41 | Foot: LR3 (2); Hand: LI4 (2) | MA: 3 min; HC: None |
| Jiang et al. ( | RCT | MCI (24, 12/12) | RA: MCI (12); SA: MCI (12) | MA: 63.83 ± 4.90; SA: 67.08 ± 5.26 | / | CDR: 0.5, MMSE ≥ 24 | Foot: LR3 (2) | MA: Needle diameter of 0.35 mm, 25 mm long, 1.5 cm deep; uniform lifting and inserting twisting row needle method, lifting and inserting amplitude in the upper and lower 2–3 mm, 30 min; SA: The midpoint of the line between the right KI3 point and the Achilles tendon. |
| Hou et al. ( | Cross sectional | MCI (10); HC (13) | EA: MCI (10); HC: 13 | 50–80 | / | MMSE ≥ 24, MoCA < 26 | Head: DU20 (1), EX-HN1 (4), BG13 (2); Leg: ST36 (2), ST40 (2), SP6 (2) | EA: Needle diameter of 0.30 mm, 40 mm long, 1.5 cm deep; rotated continuously (±180°, 120 times/min), Sparse and dense waves, 2 min |
Scanning methods and major brain region alterations in the included studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. ( | Achieva 3.0 T; RS | Whole brain | Reho | MNI, 7 | Acu vs. HC: right parahippocampal gyrus, left thalamus, right insula, and left anterior cingulate gyrus↑; left posterior cerebellar lobe, left inferior temporal gyrus, right inferior temporal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior occipital gyrus, and left superior parietal lobule↓ | |
| Shan et al. ( | Siemens3.0T; NRER | Whole brain | Reho | MNI, 11 | • Acu vs. Sham: left supramarginal gyrus, left superior temporal gyrus, left rolandic operculum, left cerebellum, right middle frontal gyrus, and right inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis) ↑; left inferior parietal gyrus↓ | |
| Jia et al. ( | Tesla Signa (GE) MR 1.5 T;NRER | Whole brain | Reho | MNI, 3 | Acu vs. Sham: right superior temporal gyrus↑; middle prefrontal gyrus ↓ | |
| Liu et al. ( | Tesla Signa (GE) MR 3.0T; NRER | Whole brain | Reho | MNI, 13 | Acu vs. HC: MTG, superior parietal lobule (SPL), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), superior marginal gyrus (SMG), and PCG↑ | |
| Wang et al. ( | Siemens3.0T; NRER | Whole brain | Reho | MNI, 44 | • AS vs. RS(First): bilateral cerebellum posterior lobe, temporal lobe, frontal lobe, parietal lobe and occipital lobe↑; bilateral CPL, temporal lobe, frontal lobe, parietal lobe right lingual gyrus and limbic regions↓ | |
| Jiang et al. ( | Achieva 3.0T; NRER | Whole brain | Reho | MNI,5 | Acu vs. Sham: right cingulate gyrus, bilateral medial frontal gyrus and left postcentral gyrus↑ | |
| Hou et al. ( | Achieva 1.5T; NRER | Whole brain | Reho | MNI, 6 | Acu vs. HC: superior temporal gyrus in the posterior temporal lobe, orbitofrontal and frontopolar regions of the frontal lobe, and temporal cortex↑ |
RS, resting state; AS, acupuncture stste; NRER, non-repeated event-related; ReHo: regional homogeneity; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute.
Figure 2Quality assessment of included studies.
Regional differences in brain gray matter volume activity PRE and POST acupuncture treatment in the coordinate-based meta-analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Right insula, BA 48 | 40 | −18 | 8 | 3.362 | 0.000386775 | 1,342 | • Right insula, BA 48 (315); Right superior temporal gyrus, BA 21, 22, 42, 48 (360); Right rolandic operculum, BA 48 (148) | 1.01% |
| Left anterior cingulate/paracingulate gyri | 0 | 14 | 26 | 3.482 | 0.000248611 | 748 | • Left median cingulate/paracingulate gyri, BA 24 (164) | 0.95% |
| Right thalamus | 4 | −18 | 4 | 3.967 | 0.000036418 | 349 | • Right thalamus (130) | 0.64% |
| Right middle frontal gyrus, BA 46 | 42 | 48 | 18 | 2.544 | 0.005474687 | 138 | • Right middle frontal gyrus, BA 46 (78) | 17.23% |
| Right median cingulate/paracingulate gyri, BA 23 | 4 | −24 | 34 | 2.185 | 0.014458418 | 83 | • Right median cingulate/paracingulate gyri, BA 23 (42) | 1.34% |
| Right middle temporal gyrus, BA 21 | 64 | −26 | −12 | 2.332 | 0.009853780 | 45 | • Right middle temporal gyrus, BA 21 (31) | 5.90% |
Peak height threshold: z > 1. Voxel probability threshold: P < 0.005 uncorrected and remained after correcting threshold (TFCE) of P < 0.05. Cluster extent threshold: number ≥ 10 voxels. BA, Brodmann area; I2, heterogeneity I2; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; R, right; ReHo, regional homogeneity; SDM, signed differential mapping.
Figure 3Changes in gray matter regions PRE and POST acupuncture treatment in MCI patients. (A) Right insula; (B) Left anterior cingulate/paracingulate gyri; (C) Right thalamus; (D) Right middle frontal gyrus; (E) Right median cingulate/paracingulate gyri; (F) Right middle temporal gyrus. Important clusters are presented with MRIcron templates.
Regional differences in brain gray matter volume activity before and after acupuncture treatment in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Left anterior cingulate/paracingulate gyri | 0 | 14 | 26 | 3.482 | 0.029999971 | 51 | • Right anterior cingulate/paracingulate gyri, BA 24 (24) | 0.72% |
| Right insula, BA 48 | 40 | −18 | 8 | 3.362 | 0.029999971 | 41 | • Right insula, BA 48 (29) | 3.75% |
Peak height threshold: z > 1. Voxel probability threshold: P < 0.005 uncorrected and remained after correcting threshold (TFCE) of P < 0.05. Cluster extent threshold: number ≥ 10 voxels. BA, Brodmann area; I2, heterogeneity I2; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; R, right; ReHo, regional homogeneity; SDM, signed differential mapping.
Regional differences in gray matter volume after acupuncture treatment in MCI patients vs. healthy controls in a coordinate-based meta-analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Right supramarginal gyrus, BA 2 | 56 | −26 | 38 | 3.525 | 0.000999987 | 180 | Right supramarginal gyrus, BA 2 (67); Right supramarginal gyrus, BA 40 (50); Right superior longitudinal fasciculus III (32); Right supramarginal gyrus, BA 48 (18); Right supramarginal gyrus, BA 3 (8); Right postcentral gyrus, BA 3 (3); Right postcentral gyrus, BA 2 (2) | 1.92% |
Peak height threshold: z > 1. Voxel probability threshold: P < 0.005 uncorrected and remained after correcting threshold (TFCE) of P < 0:05. Cluster extent threshold: number ≥ 10 voxels. BA, Brodmann area; I2, heterogeneity I2; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; R, right; ReHo, regional homogeneity; SDM, signed differential mapping.
Figure 4Regional differences in gray matter between MCI patients and healthy controls after acupuncture treatment.
Meta-regression analysis of MMSE scores in treatment group.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Right anterior thalamic projections | 8 | −18 | 0 | 2.622 | 0.001930118 | 130 |
Peak height threshold: z > 1.
Voxel probability threshold: p < 0.005.
Cluster extent threshold: number ≥ 10 voxels. SDM, signed differential mapping.
Figure 5Results of Meta-regression linear model analysis. (A) MMSE scores of MCI patients are negatively correlated with regional activity in Right anterior thalamic projections. (B) The effect sizes needed to create this plot were extracted from the peak voxels of the maximum slope difference. All studies are indicated by the empty blue circles. Regression lines (Meta-regression SDM slopes) are shown as straight lines.