| Literature DB >> 36212018 |
Chinyere Augusta Ajuzieogu1, Irene Chidinma Dyboh1, David Chinemerem Nwobodo1.
Abstract
This study investigated the bacteriological quality of ready-to-eat (RTE) African salads in Enugu metropolis, Enugu, Nigeria. A total of 10 samples of African salad were purchased from 10 different vendors in Enugu metropolis. The samples were purchased from Agbani Road, Ogbete, Mayor, Uwani, Kenyatta, Achara Layout, Obiagu and Timber. Isolation and enumeration of bacterial isolates were done using Nutrient agar, Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar, Thiosulphate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar, Salmonella-Shigella Agar (SSA) and MacConkey agar, following standard methods. Identification of the bacterial isolates were done through biochemical tests and the Analytical Profile Index (API 20E) test kit. The antibiotic sensitivity of the bacterial isolates was also done using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Total culturable heterotrophic count was above 300 colonies across the samples. The highest bacterial counts recorded on EMB, SSA and TCBS across the samples were 6.3 × 106 CFU/g, 7.4 × 106 CFU/g and 1.21 × 107 CFU/g respectively. The identities of the organisms were; Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Vibrio mimicus, Vibrio fluvialis, Vibrio cholerae, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio hollisae. The prevalent organism across the samples was Vibrio spp. The antibiotic sensitivity test suggested that Vibrio spp. was resistant to Ampiclox and Amoxycillin but sensitive to Erythromycin, Pefloxacin and Septrin. From this study, it was discovered that consumers of RTE African salad from majority of the vendors across Enugu metropolis are at risk of severe food poisoning.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance; Food poisoning; Ready-to-eat African salads; Vibrio species
Year: 2022 PMID: 36212018 PMCID: PMC9535295 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Sample location and codes.
| S/N | Sample location | Sample code |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Agbani Road | Agb |
| 2. | Ogbete market | Ogb |
| 3. | Mayor | May |
| 4. | Kenyatta | Ken |
| 5. | Uwani | Uwa |
| 6. | Obiagu | Obi |
| 7. | Achara layout | Ach |
| 8. | Timber | Tim |
Bacterial counts from RTE African Salads across sampled locations in Enugu.
| Location | Mean | Mean counts on EMB (CFU/g) ± SD | Mean counts on TCBS (CFU/g) ± SD | Mean counts on SSA (CFU/g) ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agbani Rd. | 2.4 × 107 ± 5.65 | TNC | TNC | 7.4 × 106 ± 5.65 |
| Ogbete | 1.3 × 106 ± 2.82 | Negligible | 8.5 × 106 ± 2.82 | 5.7 × 106 ± 2.82 |
| Mayor | Nil | 3.1 × 106 ± 1.41 | 1.21 × 107 ± 4.24 | 2.3 × 106 ± 2.82 |
| Kenyataa I | Negligible | Negligible | 3.7 × 106 ± 4.24 | Negligible |
| Kenyatta II | Nil | Negligible | Negligible | 6.5 × 105 ± 4.24 |
| Obiagu | Nil | 6.3 × 106 ± 5.65 | 4.0 × 106 ± 1.41 | 4.2 × 106 ± 7.0 |
| Timber | Nil | TNC | TNC | 1.21 × 107 ± 1.41 |
| Achara layout | Negligible | Negligible | Negligible | Negligible |
Key: Negligible = < 30 colonies; TNC (Too numerous to count) = > 300 colonies.
Nil = no observed colonies; SD = Standard deviation.
Biochemical characterization and identities of the isolates using the Analytical Profile Index (API 20E) Kit.
| Biochemical tests | API % similarity Identity | Organisms' Tentative Identity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolate code | ONPG | ADH | LDC | ODC | CIT | H2S | URE | TDA | IND | VP | GEL | GLU | MAN | INO | SOR | RHA | SAC | MEL | AMY | ARA | OX | NO2 | N2 | MOB | MoC | OF-O | OF-F | ||
| Tim 218 | ˗ | + | - | + | + | + | + | 99.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 216 | + | + | - | + | + | + | + | 99.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| May 212A | - | + | - | + | + | + | + | 90.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Agb 217 | + | 99.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| May 212B | + | 94.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| May 211 | + | 92.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agb 208 | + | 99% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Agb 210, Tim 207, Ken 201 | - | 90.5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ken 211, Obi 202, Uwa 201 | + | 90.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uwa 204, Ogb 201 | + | 95.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution of the bacterial isolates across sample locations.
| Bacterial isolates | Agbani road | Ogbete I & II | Mayor | Uwani | Kenyatta I & II | Achara layout | Obiagu | Timber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 1Frequency of occurrence of the bacterial isolates.
Antibiotic susceptibility profile of some of the bacterial isolates.
| Antimicrobial class | Antibiotics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sulfonamides | SXT | 28 (S) | 30 (S) | 30 (S) | 30 (S) | 30 (S) | 27 (S) | 27 (S) |
| Phenicols | CH | 29 (S) | 28 (S) | 31(S) | 30 (S) | 29 (S) | 25 (S) | 26 (S) |
| Fluoroquinolones | CPX | 30 (S) | 29 (S) | 30 (S) | 30 (S) | 28 (S) | 27 (S) | 27 (S) |
| Macrolides | E | 29 (S) | 31 (S) | 27 (S) | 28 (S) | 30 (S) | 26 (S) | NA |
| Cephalosporins | R (ceftriaxone) | 29 (S) | 29 (S) | 26 (S) | 29 (S) | 27 (S) | 28 (S) | NA |
| Aminoglycosides | CN | 27 (S) | 20 (S) | 26 (S) | 29 (S) | 28 (S) | 28 (S) | 24 (S) |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanate | AU | 28 (S) | 18 (S) | 19 (S) | 29 (S) | 28 (S) | 23 (S) | 24 (S) |
| Penicillinase-labile penicillins | AM | 29 (S) | 8 (R) | 22 (S) | 28 (S) | 28 (S) | 20 (S) | 23 (S) |
∗Zone of inhibition represented in millimeters (mm); Septrin (SXT), Chloramphenicol (CH), Ciprofloxacin (CPX), Sparfloxacin (SP), Tarivid (OFX), Pefloxacin (PEF), Erythromycin (E), Rocephin (R), Zinnaclef (Z), Gentamycin (CN), Streptomycin (S), Augmentin (AU), Amoxicillin (AM); NA(Not Available), (S) = Sensitive, (R) = Resistant.