| Literature DB >> 36211929 |
Ahmed Hassan Abdou1,2, Shaimaa Abo Khanger Mohamed1,3, Ayman Ahmed Farag Khalil1, Azzam Ibrahem Albakhit1, Ali Jukhayer Nader Alarjani1.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of perceived service quality (PSQ) on tourist satisfaction and behavioral intentions and explore the potential mediating role of tourist satisfaction in the relationship between service quality and behavioral intentions in the yoga tourism context during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, this is to examine to what extent yoga tourist satisfaction directly affects their behavioral intentions. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a review of literature, the study proposes a conceptual model to test four hypothesized relationships among the constructs of perceived service quality, tourist satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Data was collected by using a self-administrated questionnaire that was developed and directed to a convenience sample of yoga tourists (380 forms). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to determine the relationship between study constructs. Findings: The results of SEM illustrated that all the hypothesized relationships are supported. The findings confirm that yoga tourists' behavioral intentions are significantly affected directly and indirectly (through tourist satisfaction) by perceived service quality. Additionally, tourist satisfaction significantly partially mediates the relationship between PSQ and tourists' behavioral intentions. Research limitations: The subject of this study was yoga tourists staying in yoga retreats/studios in Egyptian destinations (South Sinai Governorate). Future research may focus on other geographical destinations and other influential variables of yoga tourists' satisfaction and behavioral intentions should be investigated. Practical implications: For improving tourists' satisfaction and behavioral intentions, yoga service providers should take care by giving tourists personalized attention, and understanding, fulfilling their specific needs. Health and hygiene practices must be considered during the COVID-19 pandemic. Originality/value: This study is perhaps the first empirical study that examines the relationship between PSQ and tourists' satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the yoga tourism context. A new integrated conceptual model that combined three service quality dimensions, namely, tangibles, intangibles as well as health and hygiene was developed and validated.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; behavioral intention; service quality; tourist satisfaction; yoga retreats; yoga tourism
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211929 PMCID: PMC9539312 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1The research conceptual model.
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s test.
| Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy | 0.900 | |
|
| Approx. Chi-Square | 5726.157 |
| Df | 120 | |
| Sig. | 0.000 | |
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results of perceived service quality.
| Factor | Items | Factor loading | % of variance explained | Eigenvalue | Cronbach’s |
| (1) Tangibles | Tang1 | 0.814 | 21.048% | 6.727 | 0.928 |
| Tang2 | 0.858 | ||||
| Tang3 | 0.885 | ||||
| Tang4 | 0.917 | ||||
| (2) Intangibles | In-tang1 | 0.853 | 42.046% | 3.368 | 0.957 |
| In-tang2 | 0.845 | ||||
| In-tang3 | 0.865 | ||||
| In-tang4 | 0.937 | ||||
| In-tang5 | 0.935 | ||||
| In-tang6 | 0.928 | ||||
| In-tang7 | 0.763 | ||||
| In-tang8 | 0.769 | ||||
| In-tang9 | 0.799 | ||||
| (3) Health and Hygiene | Health1 | 0.854 | 15.644% | 2.503 | 0.892 |
| Health2 | 0.896 | ||||
| Health3 | 0.834 |
Total explained variance = 78.738%.
Motivators for participating in yoga trips.
| Factor | Frequency | % |
| Enhancing physical condition | 150 | 47.3 |
| Enhancing mental well-being | 103 | 32.5 |
| Controlling negative emotions | 38 | 12 |
| Seeking spirituality | 26 | 8.2 |
| Total | 317 | 100 |
Factors affecting the choice of yoga trips.
| Factor | Mean | Standard deviation |
| Health and hygiene regulations (COVID-19 preventative measures) | 4.45 | 0.812 |
| Climate and the natural attractions in yoga destination | 4.39 | 0.778 |
| Professional and well-experienced teachers | 4.37 | 0.815 |
| Safety in a tourist destination | 4.34 | 0.837 |
| Health and quality of food provided | 4.29 | 0.884 |
| Accommodation services and facilities included | 4.25 | 0.886 |
| Recreational activities and cultural attractions | 4.01 | 1.04 |
| The popularity of yoga destination | 3.98 | 0.975 |
| Yoga styles offered | 3.96 | 0.910 |
| Secluded and unspoiled retreat/studio | 3.94 | 0.834 |
| Spa and alternative health treatment | 3.74 | 0.840 |
| Accessibility to yoga destination | 3.65 | 1.25 |
Descriptive statistics, reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis properties.
| Constructs | Items |
|
| Std. Loading | Cronbach’s | CR4 | AVE5 | |
| Tangibles | The physical facilities and accessories in a yoga retreat were visually appealing | 4.21 | 0.94 | 0.782 | F | 0.928 | 0.932 | 0.775 |
| The appearance of the physical facilities was in keeping with the type of services provided | 4.15 | 0.94 | 0.839 | 16.844 | ||||
| A yoga retreat had comfortable furniture, fixture, and an appropriate atmosphere | 4.24 | 0.90 | 0.934 | 19.5 | ||||
| The staff was well dressed and have a neat professional appearance | 4.22 | 0.88 | 0.955 | 20.037 | ||||
| Intangibles | When the staff promises to do something by a certain time, it does so | 4.04 | 1.14 | 0.852 | F | 0.957 | 0.954 | 0.701 |
| The staff shows a sincere interest in solving guests’ complaints | 4.13 | 1.11 | 0.777 | 17.434 | ||||
| The staff provides services at the time they promise to do so | 4.07 | 1.09 | 0.802 | 18.366 | ||||
| The staff never be too busy to respond to your requests | 3.86 | 1.16 | 0.992 | 28.209 | ||||
| The staff was able to understand your specific needs. | 3.84 | 1.16 | 0.988 | 27.96 | ||||
| The yoga retreat had a staff who give you a personal attention | 3.83 | 1.18 | 0.975 | 27.042 | ||||
| The staff has the skills and adequate knowledge to perform the service professionally | 3.93 | 1.21 | 0.647 | 13.339 | ||||
| The behavior of staff instilled confidence among guests | 3.93 | 1.28 | 0.662 | 13.754 | ||||
| The staff tells you exactly the right schedule of the services to be performed | 4.02 | 1.09 | 0.751 | 16.527 | ||||
| Health and hygiene | Protective masks and hand sanitizers were available for all guests and staff | 4.31 | 0.80 | 0.795 | F | 0.892 | 0.894 | 0.738 |
| The retreat space and seating capacity are limited to allow for social distancing | 4.32 | 0.83 | 0.895 | 17.504 | ||||
| Rooms, bathrooms, and public areas were usually cleaned and well sanitized | 4.35 | 0.82 | 0.883 | 17.324 | ||||
| Tourist satisfaction | The yoga retreat/studio and its staff have met all our expectation | 4.01 | 0.93 | 0.933 | F | 0.883 | 0.888 | 0.727 |
| Compared with other retreats, the level of satisfaction in this place was amazing | 4.08 | 0.98 | 0.754 | 16.54 | ||||
| Overall, I am satisfied with my experience during this travel | 4.02 | 0.93 | 0.861 | 20.189 | ||||
| Tourists’ behavioral Intentions | If had the opportunity to decide again I would revisit this retreat/studio | 4.20 | 0.87 | 0.746 | F | 0.782 | 0.786 | 0.552 |
| I will certainly recommend this retreat/studio to my friends and acquaintances | 4.24 | 0.88 | 0.776 | 12.484 | ||||
| I will speak positively of this retreat/studio to friends and relatives | 4.17 | 0.91 | 0.704 | 11.47 | ||||
M1, mean; SD2, standard deviation, Std. Loading; (CFA)3, standardized factor loading; CR4, composite reliability; AVE5, average variance extracted. x2 = 486.312 (df = 201) p < 0.001, x2/df = 2.419, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.958, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.932, Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) = 0.079, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.895, Incremental Fit Index (IFI) = 0.959, Relative Fit Index (RFI) = 0.921, Root-Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.05.
***p < 0.001.
Discriminant validity based on Fornell–Larcker criterion.
| Construct | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| (1) Perceived service quality |
| ||
| (2) Tourist satisfaction | 0.303 |
| |
| (3) Tourists’ behavioral intentions | 0.738 | 0.616 |
|
Bold diagonal numbers represent the square root of AVE’s study constructs.
Correlation matrix for the investigated dimensions.
| Tangibles | Intangibles | Health | Perceived service quality | Tourist | Tourists’ behavioral intentions | |
| Tangibles | 1 | |||||
| Intangibles | 0.299 | 1 | ||||
| Health and Hygiene | 0.518 | 0.208 | 1 | |||
| Perceived service quality | 0.628 | 0.911 | 0.509 | 1 | ||
| Tourist satisfaction | 0.218 | 0.221 | 0.328 | 0.363 | 1 | |
| Tourists’ behavioral intentions | 0.261 | 0.413 | 0.562 | 0.649 | 0.527 | 1 |
Structural parameter estimates.
| Hypothesized path | Standardized path | Results | ||||
| → | Tourist satisfaction | 0.303 | 4.299 | Supported | ||
| → | Tourists’ behavioral intentions | 0.608 | 7.199 | Supported | ||
| → | Tourists’ behavioral intentions | 0.431 | 7.434 | Supported | ||
| Tourist satisfaction | → | Tourists’ behavioral intentions | 0.131 | 3.109 | Supported | |
***P < 0.001, *P < 0.50.
FIGURE 2The structural model.