| Literature DB >> 36211560 |
Amanda A Greenwell1,2,3, Seyed Amirhossein Tabatabaei Dakhili1,2,3, Keshav Gopal1,2,3, Christina T Saed1,2,3, Jordan S F Chan1,2,3, Nick Kazungu Mugabo1, Pavel Zhabyeyev2,4,5, Farah Eaton1,2,3, Jennifer Kruger6, Gavin Y Oudit2,4,5, John R Ussher1,2,3.
Abstract
Barth syndrome (BTHS) is a rare genetic disorder due to mutations in the TAFAZZIN gene, leading to impaired maturation of cardiolipin and thereby adversely affecting mitochondrial function and energy metabolism, often resulting in cardiomyopathy. In a murine model of BTHS involving short-hairpin RNA mediated knockdown of Tafazzin (TazKD mice), myocardial glucose oxidation rates were markedly reduced, likely secondary to an impairment in the activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), the rate-limiting enzyme of glucose oxidation. Furthermore, TazKD mice exhibited cardiac hypertrophy with minimal cardiac dysfunction. Because the stimulation of myocardial glucose oxidation has been shown to alleviate diabetic cardiomyopathy and heart failure, we hypothesized that stimulating PDH activity would alleviate the cardiac hypertrophy present in TazKD mice. In order to address our hypothesis, 6-week-old male TazKD mice and their wild-type (WT) littermates were treated with dichloroacetate (DCA; 70 mM in the drinking water), which stimulates PDH activity via inhibiting PDH kinase to prevent inhibitory phosphorylation of PDH. We utilized ultrasound echocardiography to assess cardiac function and left ventricular wall structure in all mice prior to and following 6-weeks of treatment. Consistent with systemic activation of PDH and glucose oxidation, DCA treatment improved glycemia in both TazKD mice and their WT littermates, and decreased PDH phosphorylation equivalently at all 3 of its inhibitory sites (serine 293/300/232). However, DCA treatment had no impact on left ventricular structure, or systolic and diastolic function in TazKD mice. Therefore, it is unlikely that stimulating glucose oxidation is a viable target to improve BTHS-related cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Barth syndrome; cardiomyopathy; dichloroacetate; glucose oxidation; pyruvate dehydrogenase
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211560 PMCID: PMC9537754 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.997352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Cardiac hypertrophy is already present in TazKD mice at 5 weeks of age. (A–D) Body weight and body composition (lean mass, fat mass) analysis in 5-week-old TazKD mice and their WT littermates (WT: n = 13, TazKD: n = 16). Ultrasound echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular (LV) chamber and wall dimensions including (E) LV internal diameter (LVID), (F) LV volume, (G) LV anterior wall thickness (LVAW), (H) and LV posterior wall thickness (LVPW) during diastole (d), in addition to functional parameters including (I) cardiac output (CO), (J) ejection fraction (EF), (K) E/A, and (L) E/e' in 5-week old TazKD mice and their WT littermates. For structural and systolic function parameters (WT: n = 14, TazKD: n = 17); for diastolic function parameters (WT: n = 13, TazKD: n = 15). Values represent mean ± SEM. Differences were determined using an unpaired, two-tailed Student's t test. *P < 0.05 significantly different from WT littermates. BW, body weight.
In vivo baseline assessment of cardiac structural and functional parameters in WT and TazKD mice.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 401 ± 9 | 382 ± 6 |
| BW (g) | 19.8 ± 0.8 | 14.7 ± 0.9 |
| LVID (mm); s | 2.53 ± 0.11 | 2.18 ± 0.11 |
| LVID (mm); d | 3.64 ± 0.08 | 3.20 ± 0.11 |
| Volume (μL); s | 24.0 ± 2.6 | 17.1 ± 2.6 |
| Volume (μL); d | 56.4 ± 2.9 | 42.4 ± 3.6 |
| Stroke Volume (μL) | 32.4 ± 1.9 | 25.3 ± 1.9 |
| EF (%) | 58.4 ± 3.3 | 61.4 ± 2.4 |
| FS (%) | 30.9 ± 2.3 | 32.3 ± 1.6 |
| CO (ml • min−1) | 13.1 ± 0.9 | 9.7 ± 0.8 |
| LVAW/BW × 102 (mm/g); s | 5.44 ± 0.30 | 7.57 ± 0.59 |
| LVAW/BW × 102 (mm/g); d | 3.59 ± 0.21 | 5.39 ± 0.46 |
| LVPW/BW × 102 (mm/g); s | 5.89 ± 0.26 | 8.15 ± 0.58 |
| LVPW/BW × 102 (mm/g); d | 4.52 ± 0.25 | 6.33 ± 0.46 |
| E/A | 1.92 ± 0.11 | 2.11 ± 0.10 |
| e′/a′ | 1.54 ± 0.10 | 2.09 ± 0.16 |
| E/e′ | 29.0 ± 1.2 | 26.1 ± 1.3 |
In vivo cardiac function and LV wall measurements in 5-week-old WT and TazKD mice (n = 13-17). Values represent mean ± SEM.
P < 0.05, significantly different from WT.
BW, body weight; CO, cardiac output; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; LV, left ventricular; LVAW, LV anterior wall thickness; LVID, LV internal diameter; LVPW, LV posterior wall thickness; s, systole; d, diastole.
Figure 2DCA treatment decreases inhibitory PDH phosphorylation but fails to alleviate the cardiac structural abnormalities in TazKD mice. (A) Average daily consumption of water or water supplemented with DCA (70 mM) reported per individual mouse for each week of the experimental protocol (n = 17–18). (B) Random-fed blood glucose measurements of WT and TazKD mice either subjected to control or DCA treatment (n = 7–11). Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) phosphorylation at (C) serine 293, (D) serine 232, and (E) serine 300 relative to total PDH in myocardial tissue from WT and TazKD mice treated with control or DCA for 6-weeks (n = 5–6). (F) PDHK4 protein expression relative to vinculin in myocardial tissue from WT and TazKD mice treated with control or DCA for 6-weeks (n = 4–5). Ultrasound echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular (LV) chamber and wall dimensions including (G) LV internal diameter (LVID), (H) LV volume, (I) LV anterior wall thickness (LVAW), and (J) LV posterior wall thickness (LVPW) during diastole (d), in addition to functional parameters including (K) cardiac output (CO), (L) ejection fraction (EF), (M) E/A, and (N) E/e' in WT and TazKD mice treated with control of DCA. For structural and systolic function parameters (WT control: n = 7, WT DCA: n = 7, TazKD control: n = 10, TazKD DCA: n = 7); for diastolic function parameters (WT control: n = 6, WT DCA: n = 7, TazKD control: n = 8, TazKD DCA: n = 7). Relative mRNA expression of (O) skeletal α-actin (Acta1) and (P) brain natriuretic peptide (Nppb) normalized to cyclophilin A (Ppia), and (Q) total protein carbonylation in myocardial tissue from WT and TazKD mice treated with control or DCA for 6-weeks (n = 4-7). Values represent mean ± SEM. Differences were determined using a two-way ANOVA. ∧P < 0.05, significantly different from control treated mice. #P < 0.05, significantly different from control treated counterpart. *P < 0.05, significantly different from WT counterpart. BW, body weight.
In vivo assessment of cardiac structural and functional parameters in WT and TazKD mice following treatment with DCA.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 400 ± 14 | 378 ± 8 | 377 ± 11 | 379 ± 8 |
| BW (g) | 26.0 ± 0.7 | 22.6 ± 1.0 | 21.2 ± 0.7 | 20.0 ± 0.9 |
| LVID (mm); s | 2.87 ± 0.15 | 2.28 ± 0.08 | 2.11 ± 0.15 | 2.02 ± 0.28 |
| LVID (mm); d | 4.02 ± 0.17 | 3.63 ± 0.04 | 3.36 ± 0.14 | 3.15 ± 0.18 |
| Volume (μL); s | 32.4 ± 4.0 | 17.9 ± 1.6 | 15.8 ± 3.0 | 15.9 ± 4.4 |
| Volume (μL); d | 71.9 ± 6.8 | 55.6 ± 1.5 | 47.3 ± 4.9 | 40.7 ± 5.2 |
| Stroke Volume (μL) | 39.5 ± 3.2 | 37.7 ± 1.5 | 31.5 ± 2.3 | 24.9 ± 1.7 |
| EF (%) | 55.5 ± 2.1 | 67.8 ± 2.5 | 68.6 ± 2.8 | 65.7 ± 6.7 |
| FS (%) | 28.7 ± 1.4 | 37.3 ± 1.9 | 37.9 ± 2.1 | 37.5 ± 6.1 |
| CO (ml • min−1) | 15.8 ± 1.5 | 14.2 ± 0.7 | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 9.44 ± 0.7 |
| LVAW/BW × 102 (mm/g); s | 4.82 ± 0.30 | 5.02 ± 0.41 | 6.79 ± 0.29 | 6.36 ± 0.49 |
| LVAW/BW × 102 (mm/g); d | 3.36 ± 0.28 | 3.09 ± 0.19 | 4.66 ± 0.25 | 4.30 ± 0.35 |
| LVPW/BW × 102 (mm/g); s | 4.19 ± 0.31 | 5.49 ± 0.39 | 6.27 ± 0.39 | 6.65 ± 0.50 |
| LVPW/BW × 102 (mm/g); d | 3.03 ± 0.22 | 3.72 ± 0.31 | 4.46 ± 0.30 | 5.16 ± 0.55 |
| E/A | 1.74 ± 0.12 | 1.67 ± 0.13 | 1.98 ± 0.19 | 1.90 ± 0.18 |
| e′/a′ | 1.40 ± 0.13 | 1.56 ± 0.11 | 1.86 ± 0.15 | 1.90 ± 0.18 |
| E/e′ | 25.7 ± 1.5 | 25.9 ± 1.2 | 25.7 ± 2.2 | 26.0 ± 1.5 |
In vivo cardiac function and LV wall measurements in WT and TazKD mice subjected to control or DCA treatment for 6-weeks (n = 6–10). Values represent mean ± SEM.
P < 0.05, significantly different from WT counterpart.
P < 0.05, significantly different from control treated counterpart.
P = 0.07, vs. WT counterpart. BW, body weight; CO, cardiac output; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; LV, left ventricular; LVAW, LV anterior wall thickness; LVID, LV internal diameter; LVPW, LV posterior wall thickness; s, systole; d, diastole.