| Literature DB >> 36211517 |
Fan Yang1,2, Zhaotian Ma1,3, Wanyang Li4, Jingwei Kong1,2, Yuhan Zong1,2, Bilige Wendusu1,3, Qinglu Wu5, Yao Li5, Guangda Dong5, Xiaoshan Zhao6, Ji Wang2.
Abstract
Background: Although fatty acid metabolism has been confirmed to be involved in the pathological process of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), systematic analyses on the immune process mediated by fatty acid metabolism-related genes (FAMRGs) in IPF remain lacking.Entities:
Keywords: NK cell; diagnostic model; fatty acid metabolism-related genes; idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; molecular subtype
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211517 PMCID: PMC9537386 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.992331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Identification of core FAMRGs in IPF. (A) WGCNA analysis was performed on the training set to obtain the cluster tree of co-expressed genes. (B) Construct module-trait relationships, with each module containing the corresponding correlation and P-value. (C) Soft threshold of scale-free network. (D) The interaction of 24 core FAMRGs. (E) Heatmap of the matrix of co-occurrence information for IPF samples.
Figure 2By unsupervised clustering of 24 FAMRGs, two different subtypes were identified in IPF. (A) GO analysis of differentially expressed genes between subtypes reveals related biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components. (B) KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes among subtypes. (C) GSEA analysis of key differential pathways among subtypes. (D) Distribution proportion of fatty acid metabolism in samples of different subtypes. (E) Differences in fatty acid metabolism between subtypes. (F) Differences in the expression levels of fibrosis-related biomarkers among subtypes. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Construction and validation of diagnostic lirogram model. (A) Random forest tree constructed by cross validation. (B) Genes ranked in the top 30 by importance score. (C) Rograms were used to predict different fatty acid metabolism levels in IPF patients. (D) Calibration curves to assess the predictive power of the line-graph model. (E) DCA curve to evaluate the clinical value of the lipopograph model. (F) Evaluate the clinical impact curve of the lipopograph model based on DCA curve. (G) Expression levels and diagnostic efficacy of model key genes in dataset GSE10667. (H) Expression levels and diagnostic efficacy of model key genes in dataset GSE53845. (I) Expression levels and diagnostic efficacy of key genes in the model in dataset GSE110147. (J) Expression levels and diagnostic efficacy of model key genes in dataset GSE150910. (K) Expression levels and diagnostic efficacy of key genes in the model in the four combined data sets. (L) Expression levels of ABCA3 and CYP24A1 in subtypes A and B.
Figure 4Expression levels of fibrosis markers and fatty acid metabolism in rats with different degrees of pulmonary fibrosis. (A) Photomicrographs of lung sections stained with H&E. (B) Photomicrographs of lung sections stained with Masson Trichrome staining. (C) Content of free fatty acids in lung tissues of rats in each group. (D) Gene expression levels of fibrosis markers and key diagnostic genes in lung tissues of rats in each group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5Immune cell infiltration between subtypes. (A) Immune microenvironment of subtypes A and B. (B) Differences in immune cell infiltration among subtypes. (C) Correlation heat maps of immune cells with differences. (D) Correlation between ABCA3 gene expression and immune cell infiltration. (E) Correlation between CYP24A1 gene expression level and immune cell infiltration.