| Literature DB >> 36211499 |
Jiaxue Cui1, Duoji Zhaxi2, Xianzhi Sun1, Nan Teng1, Ruiqi Wang1, Yizhuo Diao1, Chenxin Jin1, Yongxing Chen1, Xiaoguang Xu2,3, Xiaofeng Li1.
Abstract
This study focused on the association of dietary patterns and Tibetan featured foods with high-altitude polycythemia (HAPC) in Naqu, Tibet, to explore the risk factors of HAPC in Naqu, Tibet, to raise awareness of the disease among the population and provide evidence for the development of prevention and treatment interventions. A 1:2 individual-matched case-control study design was used to select residents of three villages in the Naqu region of Tibet as the study population. During the health examination and questionnaire survey conducted from December 2020 to December 2021, a sample of 1,171 cases was collected. And after inclusion and exclusion criteria and energy intake correction, 100 patients diagnosed with HAPC using the "Qinghai criteria" were identified as the case group, while 1,059 patients without HAPC or HAPC -related diseases were identified as the control group. Individuals were matched by a 1:2 propensity score matching according to gender, age, body mass index (BMI), length of residence, working altitude, smoking status, and alcohol status. Dietary patterns were determined by a principal component analysis, and the scores of study subjects for each dietary pattern were calculated. The effect of dietary pattern scores and mean daily intake (g/day) of foods in the Tibetan specialty diet on the prevalence of HAPC was analyzed using conditional logistic regression. After propensity score matching, we found three main dietary patterns among residents in Naqu through principal component analysis, which were a "high protein pattern," "snack food pattern," and "vegetarian food pattern." All three dietary patterns showed a high linear association with HAPC (p < 0.05) and were risk factors for HAPC. In the analysis of the relationship between Tibetan featured foods and the prevalence of HAPC, the results of the multifactorial analysis following adjustment for other featured foods showed that there was a positive correlation between the average daily intake of tsampa and the presence of HAPC, which was a risk factor. Additionally, there was an inverse correlation between the average daily intake of ghee tea and the presence of HAPC, which was a protective factor.Entities:
Keywords: 1:2 individual matched case-control study; Tibet; dietary pattern; featured foods; high altitude polycythemia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211499 PMCID: PMC9538783 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.946259
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
PSM of the name of each variable and the meaning of the assigned value.
| Variable | Variable meaning | Variable assignment |
| Age | The age of the research subjects | |
| Gender | Gender of study subjects | 1: Male, 2: Female |
| Body mass index | Subject’s height (m) divided by weight squared (kg) | |
| Smoke | Smoking status | 1: Yes, 0: No |
| Alcohol | Alcohol status | 1: Yes, 0: No |
| Length of residence | Years of residence in the Naqu region of Tibet | 1: From birth, 2: Migrate |
| Working altitude | Usually performs work at the altitude | 1: < 4,500 m, 2: > 4,500 m |
FFQ groups and foods contained and the average intake after energy correction of the two groups (before PSM).
| Group | Foods contained and average intake of the two groups |
| Staple foods | Rice (41.85, 49.49), tsampa (64.83, 35.75), wheat flour (19.92, 8.40), rice flour (17.34, 19.78), ginseng fruit (0.03, 2.30), hanging noodles (2.21, 9.72), corn (2.92, 8.67), sweet potato (0.92, 0.47) |
| Meat | Pork (muscle) (–3.41, 11.06), pork (fat and muscle) (–5.19, 2.91), beef (–6.93, 67.12), lamb (31.26, 7.94), chicken (2.04, 11.48), sausage (–1.44 3.13), pork legs, and feet (0.01, 0.22) |
| Milk and milk products | Whole fresh milk (30.87, 22.83), low-fat fresh milk (5.95, 6.33), fresh goat’s milk (6.61, 2.16), yogurt (12.81, 10.39), ice cream (5.06, 4.65), cheese (4.69, 10.61), milk dregs (5.47, 5.19), ghee (–17.48, 19.81) |
| Eggs | Eggs (–11.37, 12.97), duck eggs (1.17, 0.42) |
| Beans | Tofu (5.74, 7.27), dry bean-curd (0.00, 2.29), soy milk (1.35, 2.29) |
| Savory dishes | Salted radish (4.29, 1.58), salty cucumber (4.35, 0.72), mustard (2.65, 0.55), pickle (6.76, 1.21) |
| Snacks and nuts | Cakes (–2.88, 4.01), bread (4.32, 7.68), cookies (3.05, 4.01), instant noodles (13.14, 5.52), potato chips (0.07, 1.35), peanuts (21.31, 4.17), walnuts (1.60, 1.09), chestnuts (–0.13, 0.57) |
| Fungi and mushrooms | Dried mushrooms (0.46, 4.08), fresh mushrooms (2.97, 1.37), kelp (4.86, 0.75), nori (7.29, 0.78) |
| All vegetables | Cabbage, carrot, potato, cabbage, green pepper, bean sprout, lettuce, cauliflower, bell pepper, winter squash, pumpkin (Due to the wide variety of vegetables, only the average daily intakes of the major vegetable categories were collected in the questionnaire design and survey, and these vegetables mentioned in the table were only for the respondents’ reference recall to obtain the most realistic data. Vegetables were also counted as a category only in the process of counting FFQ food types and quantities.) (115.01, 48.36) |
| Fruits | Watermelon (24.50, 11.00), grapes (5.16, 8.21), apples (59.43, 23.09), bananas (76.25, 9.85), pears (53.36, 5.95), oranges (33.13, 13.07), raisins (0.68, 2.08), peaches (2.36, 1.40), strawberries (–0.13, 1.43), lychees (26.59, 0.21), mangoes (0.03, 1.15), hawthorn (0.59, 4.40), persimmons (8.15, 0.22), dates (5.30, 0.45) |
| Tea and beverages | Ghee tea (40.01, 99.73), sweet tea (12.50, 13.11), green tea (62.90, 69.94), cola (34.33, 22.93), juice (26.69, 9.04), coffee (2.22, 1.97), black tea (–1.16, 3.00), milk tea (3.32, 3.91) |
| Sugars | Sugar (26.44, 6.24) (The sugar in this case is refined sugar made from molasses extracted from sucrose and beets.) |
| Oils | Peanut oil (15.25, 16.09) |
| Salt | Edible salt (7.47, 10.17) |
*The numbers in parentheses represent the average intake of each food in the case and control groups, respectively, after energy correction. Intake units in g/day. Example: food (mean intake for the case group, mean intake for the control group).
Baseline characteristics of study subjects before PSM.
| Control | Case |
| SMD | ||
| Age (years), mean ( | 32.17 (13.50) | 43.01 (17.43) | <0.001 | 0.695 | |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ( | 24.05 (5.77) | 26.80 (5.04) | <0.001 | 0.508 | |
| Gender (%) | Male | 603 (56.9) | 40 (40.0) | 0.002 | 0.344 |
| Female | 456 (43.1) | 60 (60.0) | |||
| Length of residence (%) | From birth | 834 (78.8) | 99 (99.0) | <0.001 | 0.680 |
| Immigrated | 225 (21.2) | 1 (1.0) | |||
| Working altitude (%) | < 4,500 m | 360 (34.0) | 6 (6.0) | <0.001 | 0.747 |
| > 4,500 m | 699 (66.0) | 94 (94.0) | |||
| Smoking (%) | Yes | 144 (13.6) | 5 (5.0) | 0.021 | 0.299 |
| No | 915 (86.4) | 95 (95.0) | |||
| Alcohol (%) | Yes | 129 (12.2) | 10 (10.0) | 0.631 | 0.070 |
| No | 930 (87.8) | 90 (90.0) |
BMI, body mass index, SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference.
Baseline characteristics of study subjects after PSM.
| Control | Case |
| SMD | ||
| Age (years), mean ( | 41.65 (16.09) | 43.01 (17.43) | 0.501 | 0.081 | |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean ( | 26.49 (6.51) | 26.80 (5.04) | 0.672 | 0.054 | |
| Gender (%) | Male | 81 (40.5) | 40 (40.0) | 1.000 | 0.010 |
| Female | 119 (59.5) | 60 (60.0) | |||
| Length of residence (%) | From birth | 197 (98.5) | 99 (99.0) | 1.000 | 0.045 |
| Immigrated | 3 (1.5) | 1 (1.0) | |||
| Working altitude (%) | < 4,500 m | 12 (6.0) | 6 (6.0) | 1.000 | <0.001 |
| > 4,500 m | 188 (94.0) | 94 (94.0) | |||
| Smoking (%) | Yes | 10 (5.0) | 5 (5.0) | 1.000 | <0.001 |
| No | 190 (95.0) | 95 (95.0) | |||
| Alcohol (%) | Yes | 21 (10.5) | 10 (10.0) | 1.000 | 0.016 |
| No | 179 (89.5) | 90 (90.0) |
BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation; SMD, standardized mean difference.
FIGURE 1Parallel analysis scree plot. The principal component analysis of the 14 food groups and the component folds of the actual data and their slopes indicate that we should choose three principal components.
Dietary pattern factor loadings.
| Factor | High protein pattern | Factor | Snack food pattern | Factor | Vegetarian food pattern |
| Eggs | 0.93 | Snacks and nuts | 0.81 | Fungi and mushrooms | 0.80 |
| Meat | 0.92 | Fruits | 0.76 | Tea and beverages | 0.58 |
| Milk and milk products | 0.90 | Beans | 0.64 | All vegetables | 0.45 |
| Savory dishes | 0.80 | Savory dishes | 0.12 | Savory dishes | 0.34 |
| Staple foods | 0.52 | Fungi and mushrooms | 0.09 | Sugars | 0.21 |
| Salt | 0.23 | All vegetables | 0.06 | Fruits | 0.14 |
| All vegetables | 0.01 | Sugars | 0.05 | Beans | 0.03 |
| Fungi and mushrooms | 0.00 | Salt | 0.01 | Milk and milk products | 0.00 |
| Snacks and nuts | –0.07 | Eggs | –0.15 | Snacks and nuts | –0.12 |
| Tea and beverages | –0.08 | Milk and milk products | –0.16 | Eggs | –0.14 |
| Beans | –0.16 | Meat | –0.23 | Meat | –0.14 |
| Fruits | –0.17 | Staple foods | –0.23 | Salt | –0.22 |
| Sugars | –0.20 | Oils | –0.26 | Oils | –0.25 |
| Oils | –0.25 | Tea and beverages | –0.36 | Staple foods | –0.32 |
Conditional logistic regression analysis of dietary pattern scores.
| Control ( | Case ( | Crude | Adjusted | |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Mean ( | Mean ( | OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| High protein pattern | –0.05 (1.05) | 0.11 (0.89) | 1.18 (0.92–1.51) | 0.202 | 1.52 (1.13–2.04) | 0.005 |
| Snack food pattern | –0.18 (1.13) | 0.35 (0.51) | 1.84 (1.34–2.53) | <0.001 | 2.11 (1.51–2.94) | <0.001 |
| Vegetarian food pattern | –0.24 (1.06) | 0.48 (0.64) | 2.47 (1.73–3.54) | <0.001 | 2.80 (1.94–4.06) | <0.001 |
CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio. †Multifactorial conditional logistic regression, adjusted for scores of the other two dietary patterns, *p < 0.05, **P < 0.1, ***p < 0.001.
Conditional logistic regression analysis of Tibetan featured foods.
| Control ( | Case ( | Crude | Adjust | |||
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Mean ( | Mean ( | OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95%) |
| |
| Tsampa | 34.80 (26.35) | 64.83 (22.09) | 1.05(1.03–1.06) | <0.001 | 1.04 (1.03–1.05) | <0.001 |
| Cheese | 11.08 (15.07) | 4.69 (5.55) | 0.95 (0.93–0.98) | <0.001 | 0.99 (0.95–1.03) | 0.495 |
| Milk dregs | 5.07 (13.05) | 5.47 (4.07) | 1.00 (0.98–1.03) | 0.768 | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) | 0.776 |
| Ghee | 18.26 (107.84) | –17.48 (89.46) | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.009 | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.292 |
| Ghee tea | 98.93 (65.83) | 40.01 (55.65) | 0.99 (0.98–0.99) | <0.001 | 0.99 (0.98–1.00) | 0.002 |
| Tibetan sweet tea | 12.63 (28.83) | 12.50 (15.69) | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.962 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.947 |
CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio. †Multifactorial conditional logistic regression, adjusted for mean daily intake of other featured foods, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.1, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Dietary pattern forest plot. High protein pattern, snacking pattern, and vegetarian pattern all increase the risk of high-altitude polycythemia. The different colored rectangles represent different dietary patterns. The horizontal coordinate represents the OR value, and the length of the thin line indicates the size of the 95% CI. Multifactorial conditional logistic regression, adjusted for scores of the other two dietary patterns, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.1, ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 3Dietary pattern nomogram plot. Based on the contribution of each dietary pattern to the prevalence of HAPC in the conditional logistic regression analysis, a score was assigned to each intake level of each dietary pattern. The individual scores were then summed to obtain the total score, which resulted in the predicted value of different dietary pattern intake levels in relation to the prevalence of HAPC.
FIGURE 4Featured foods forest plot. After adjusting several other featured foods, tsampa intake increases the risk of high-altitude polycythemia, while ghee tea intake decreases the risk of high-altitude polycythemia. The different colored rectangles represent different featured foods. The horizontal coordinate represents the OR value, and the length of the thin line indicates the size of the 95% CI. Multifactorial conditional logistic regression, adjusted for mean daily intake of other featured foods, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.1, ***P < 0.001.
FIGURE 5Featured foods nomogram plot. Based on the contribution of each featured food to the prevalence of HAPC in the conditional logistic regression analysis, a score was assigned to each intake level of each featured food. The individual scores were then summed to obtain the total score, which resulted in the predicted value of different featured food intake levels in relation to the prevalence of HAPC.