| Literature DB >> 36211440 |
K R van Straalen1, K Dudink2, P Aarts2, H H van der Zee2, T P P van den Bosch3, J Giang4, E P Prens2,5, J Damman3.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic auto-inflammatory skin disease with a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis involving both the innate and adaptive immune system. Despite limited evidence for local complement activation, conflicting results have been published on the role of systemic complement activation in HS. It was hypothesized that complement was consumed in highly inflamed HS skin, trapping complement from the circulation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate this local complement deposition in HS skin lesions using routine and commonly used complement antibodies.Direct immunofluorescence for C1q, C3c, C4d, C5b-9, and properdin was performed on frozen tissue sections of 19 HS patients and 6 controls. C5a receptor 1 (C5aR1) was visualized using immunohistochemistry. Overall, we found no significant local complement deposition in HS patients versus controls regarding C1q, C3c, C4d, C5b-9, or properdin on either vessels or immune cells. C5aR1 expression was exclusively found on immune cells, predominantly neutrophilic granulocytes, but not significantly different relatively to the total infiltrate in HS lesions compared with controls. In conclusion, despite not being able to confirm local complement depositions of C1q, C3c, C4d, or properdin using highly sensitive and widely accepted techniques, the increased presence of C5aR1 positive immune cells in HS suggests the importance of complement in the pathogenesis of HS and supports emerging therapies targeting this pathway.Entities:
Keywords: C5a anaphylatoxin; bacteria; complement -innate immune system; hidradenitis suppurativa; immune system; treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211440 PMCID: PMC9535337 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.953674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Hypothesized role of complement in HS. Despite finding no evidence for the activation of complement in our study, complement proteins have several well-known functions which are likely to contribute to HS pathogenesis. This figure illustrates the mechanisms of activation and regulation of the complement cascade and outlines how it’s effector functions could fit into the pathogenesis of HS. The complement cascade can be activated by three different pathways: the classical, lectin and alternative pathway. The classical pathway is triggered by antibody-antigen complexes, cell particles and acute phase proteins binding to C1 (consisting of C1q, C1r, and C1s), and is therefore more likely to play a more prominent role in later stages of the diseases. Activation of the lectin pathway occurs through the binding of the complex of mannose-binding lectin or ficolins to PAMPs or DAMPs released from dilated and ruptured follicles and tunnels. Both pathways result in the activation of C4 and C2, to form the C3 convertase, C4b2a. The alternative pathway depends on constitutive spontaneous low-grade hydrolysis of C3, ultimately forming the alternative C3-convertase C3bBb. All pathways converge on the cleavage of C3 into C3a and C3b. C3b forms a C5 convertase by combining with previous C3 convertases initiating the terminal complement pathway by cleaving of C5 into C5a and C5b. C5b forms a complex with C6 and C7, which is inserted in the cell membrane. Subsequently, C8 and multiple C9 molecules bind to this complex, resulting in a fully functional MAC (C5b-9) capable of lysing for example bacteria expelled from ruptured follicles and tunnels or direct attack on epithelial cells. C3a and C5a are potent anaphylatoxins resulting in increased vessel permeability and further attracting monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells and T cells (C5a) to the HS lesion. These cells are also capable of locally producing complement components. In addition, interaction of C3a with C3aR and C5a with C5aR1 induces macrophages to secrete HS associated pro-inflammatory cytokines, increases proliferation of T cells, and promotes Th1 and Th17 expansion, cell types that play prominent role in HS pathogenesis. In addition, regulatory T-cell generation and function are decreased by C3a and C5a (not shown in figure). Activation of neutrophils leads to the release of prostaglandins, reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species, and MMP-9. The latter potentially aiding the characteristic HS tissue destruction. Two therapies, vilobelimab and avacopan, aimed neutralizing C5a and blocking C5aR1 respectively, have shown promising preliminary results in HS. Bacterial opsonization with (i)C3b facilitates phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils and has been shown to stimulate NETosis. Prominent NET formation found in chronic HS lesions could be contributing to further complement activation through for example MPO and cathepsin G depositions on extruded NETs which are able to respectively cleave C3 and C5. Recognition of C3dg-coated bacteria by antigen-specific B-cell receptors and CR2 lower the threshold of B cell activation and promotes antibody production. Local secretion of antibodies may in turn aid activation of the classical pathway. C1INH, C1 esterase inhibitor; CR, complement receptor; DAF, decay-accelerating factor; DAMPs, danger associated molecular patterns; DC, dendritic cell; FB, Factor B; Fb, fibroblast; FCN1, ficolin 1; FD, Factor D; FH, Factor H; FI, Factor I; FP, Factor P; MAC, membrane attack complex; Mac, macrophage; MC, mast cell; MASP, mannose-associated serine protease; MCP, Membrane cofactor protein; NET, neutrophil extracellular trap; PAMPs, pathogen associated molecular patterns; PG, prostaglandins; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RNS, reactive nitrogen species.
Patient characteristics.
| Total n = 19 | Hurley I n = 6 | Hurley II n = 8 | Hurley II n = 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Female | 8 | (42) | 3 | (50) | 4 | (50) | 1 | (20) |
|
| 45.3 | [32.0-55.2] | 46.7 | [31.8-50.8] | 48.8 | [38.0-56.7] | 32.0 | [20.8-56.4] |
|
| 26.8 | [15.5-36.0] | 30.0 | [20.3-39.8] | 20.0 | [13.5-12.4] | 29.0 | [17.0-38.5] |
|
| 14.7 | [3.6-23.0] | 12.8 | [4.3-17.8] | 20.3 | [12.4-32.8] | 3.1 | [3.0-18.6] |
|
| 27.3 | [24.5-30.6] | 26.3 | [23.6-30.8] | 25.3 | [23.9-30.5] | 26.0 | [25.1-29.4] |
|
| ||||||||
| Current or ex-smoker | 14 | (74) | 5 | (83) | 6 | (75) | 3 | (60) |
|
| ||||||||
| Axillae | 5 | (26) | 1 | (17) | 2 | (25) | 2 | (40) |
| Groin | 3 | (16) | 2 | (33) | 1 | (13) | 0 | (0) |
| Buttocks | 9 | (47) | 3 | (50) | 3 | (38) | 3 | (60) |
| Abdomen | 2 | (11) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (25) | 0 | (0) |
IQR, Interquartile range; BMI, Body mass index. * Missing data for 2 patients ** Missing data for 1 patient.
Direct immunofluorescence intensity and cumulative scores in HS versus healthy controls for blood vessels.
| Hidradenitis | Suppurativa (n = 19) | Healthy | Controls (n = 6) | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity* | cumulative+ | intensity* | cumulative+ | intensity | cumulative | |
|
| 0 (84) | 0 (84) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0.584 | 0.584 |
| 1 (5) | 1 (5) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | |||
| 2 (11) | 2 (11) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | |||
|
| 0 (47) | 0 (47) | 0 (67) | 1 (67) | 0.114 | 0.132 |
| 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 2 (42) | 2 (42) | 2 (0) | 3 (0) | |||
| 3 (11) | 3 (5) | 3 (33) | 6 (17) | |||
| 9 (5) | 9 (17) | |||||
|
| 0 (74) | 0 (74) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0.373 | 0.373 |
| 1 (10) | 1 (5) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | |||
| 2 (16) | 2 (21) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | |||
|
| 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | n.c. | n.c. |
| 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | |||
| 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | |||
|
| 0 (95) | 0 (95) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0.566 | 0.566 |
| 1 (5) | 1 (5) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | |||
| 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) |
All data is expressed as scoring category (%). PMN, Polymorphonuclear leukocyte; n.c, not calculated. *Intensity was scored on a nominal scale of 0–3: none (0), weak (1), moderate (2), profound/bright (3). +Cumulative score was calculated by multiplying the intensity x area.
Subgroup analysis of direct immunofluorescence intensity and cumulative scores for different Hurley stages in HS for blood vessels.
| Hurley I | Hurley II | Hurley III | P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intensity* | Cumulative+ | intensity* | Cumulative+ | intensity* | Cumulative+ | intensity | Cumulative | |
|
| 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (88) | 0 (88) | 0 (60) | 0 (60) | 0.352 | 0.352 |
| 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | |||
| 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (13) | 2 (13) | 2 (20) | 2 (20) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | |||
|
| 0 (50) | 0 (50) | 0 (75) | 0 (75) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.111 | 0.088 |
| 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | |||
| 2 (33) | 2 (33) | 2 (25) | 2 (25) | 2 (80) | 2 (80) | |||
| 3 (17) | 3 (17) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (20) | 9 (20) | |||
|
| 0 (63) | 0 (63) | 0 (63) | 0 (63) | 0 (60) | 0 (60) | 0.501 | 0.357 |
| 1 (12) | 1 (12) | 1 (13) | 1 (13) | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | |||
| 2 (25) | 2 (25) | 2 (25) | 2 (25) | 2 (20) | 2 (20) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |||
|
| 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | n.c. | n.c. |
| 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | |||
| 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | |||
|
| 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (80) | 0 (80) | 0.228 | 0.228 |
| 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (0) | 1 (20) | 1 (20) | |||
| 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) | 3 (0) |
All data is expressed as scoring category (%).n.c, not calculated. *Intensity was scored on a nominal scale of 0–3: none (0), weak (1), moderate (2), profound/bright (3). +Cumulative score was calculated by multiplying the intensity x area.
Figure 2Direct immunofluoresence of complement components. Direct immunofluorescence findings in a case of Hurley stage 3 (panel A) shows focal moderate vascular endothelial C3c staining in a single vessel (V). Panel D shows the corresponding frozen H&E section with profound plasmacellular perivascular inflammation (solid arrows). Panel B shows strong focal vascular endothelial staining for C4d in a single vessel in Hurley stage 3 and the corresponding H&E (E) demonstrates mild-to-moderate lymphohistiocytic perivascular inflammation. Note the surrounding fibrosis with scattered fibroblast (solid arrow) in parallel distribution. Weak C5b-9 deposition in a vessel of Hurley stage 2 (Panel C) in which the H&E (F) reveals moderate chronic inflammation with perivascular lymphohistiocytic inflammation (solid arrows). (A) C3c 40x. (B) C4d 40x. (C) C5b-9 40x. (D) H&E 40x. (E) H&E 40x. (F) H&E 40x.
Figure 3Representative C5aR1 staining in Hurley stage I patient. Panel A (5x magnification) and C (25x) show representative H&E sections of a Hurley stage I patient with extensive deep dermal and subcutaneous suppurative (S) abscessing inflammation surrounding hair follicles with hyperkeratosis (HF). The inset in panel C shows that the infiltrate almost exclusively exists of neutrophils. Panels B, D shows that a large part of these neutrophils are C5aR1 positive. (A) H&E 5x. (B) C5aR1 25x. (C) H&E 5x. (D) C5aR1 25x.
Figure 5Representative C5aR1 staining in Hurley stage III patient. Panel A (5x magnification) and C (25x) show representative H&E sections of a Hurley stage III patient with tunnel formation (T) with luminal hyperkeratosis and profound surrounding granulomatous (G) inflammation with foreign body giant cells (GC) and extensive fibrosis/scarring (F). The inset (40x) shows a foreign body giant cell surrounded by many plasma cells. Panels B, D show the corresponding C5aR1 stainings in which many histiocytes and giant cells are C5aR1 positive. Inset 40x. (A) H&E 5x. (B) C5aR1 5x. (C) H&E 25x. (D) C5aR1 25x.
Figure 6C5aR1 staining of different immune cell types. Cumulative score of C5aR1 staining for the control group plotted separately for PMNs (A) and histiocytes (B), overall HS group and per Hurley category. PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte.
Figure 7C5aR1 staining in relation to dermal tunnels. Cumulative score of C5aR1 staining in or near tunnels stratified per Hurley category, plotted separately for PMNs (A) and histiocytes (B). Association of C5aR1 positive immune cells with epithelial remnants of ruptured abscesses were scored for Hurley (I) PMN, polymorphonuclear leukocyte.