| Literature DB >> 36211377 |
Helena Deriš1, Petra Tominac1, Frano Vučković1, Nina Briški1, Arne Astrup2, Ellen E Blaak3, Gordan Lauc1,4, Ivan Gudelj1,5.
Abstract
Obesity-induced inflammation activates the adaptive immune system by altering immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycosylation in a way to produce more proinflammatory antibodies. The IgG glycome has already been well studied, and its alterations are correlated with a high body mass index (BMI) and central adiposity. Still, the IgG N-glycome susceptibility to different dietary regimes for weight control after the initial weight loss has not been studied. To explore changes in IgG glycosylation induced by weight loss and subsequent weight-maintenance diets, we analyzed 1,850 IgG glycomes from subjects in a dietary intervention Diogenes study. In this study, participants followed a low-calorie diet (LCD) providing 800 kcal/d for 8 weeks, followed by one of five weight-maintenance diets over a 6-month period. The most significant alteration of the IgG N-glycome was present 8 weeks after the subjects underwent an LCD, a statistically significant decrease of agalactosylated and the increase of sialylated N glycans. In the follow-up period, the increase in glycans with bisecting GlcNAc and the decrease in sialylated glycans were observed. Those changes were present regardless of the diet type, and we did not observe significant changes between different diets. However, it should be noted that in all five diet groups, there were individuals who prominently altered their IgG glycome composition in either proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory directions.Entities:
Keywords: IgG; calorie reduction; glycosylation; healthy diet; weight maintenance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211377 PMCID: PMC9535357 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.995186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Effect of calorie loss on the immunoglobulin G (IgG) glycome in the first time period (T1–T2) and effect of different weight maintenance diets on the IgG glycome in the second time period (T2–T3). Changes in IgG glycome composition after performing meta-analysis for all the centers are shown. SE, standard error; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; T1, time point 1; T2, time point 2; T3, time point 3; G0, agalactosylated glycans; G1, monogalactosylated glycans; G2, digalactosylated glycans; S, glycans containing sialic acid; F, glycans with core fucose; B, glycans with bisecting GlcNAc.
Figure 2IgG glycome composition changes between different time-periods normalized to the first point. T1, time point 1; T2, time point 2; T3, time point 3; G0, agalactosylated glycans; G1, monogalactosylated glycan structures; G2, glycans with two galactoses; S, glycans containing sialic acid; F, glycans with core fucose; B, glycans with bisecting GlcNAc.