Literature DB >> 3621123

Physician response to informed consent regulations for randomized clinical trials.

K M Taylor, M Shapiro, C L Soskolne, R G Margolese.   

Abstract

To improve our understanding of physician reluctance to participate in randomized clinical trials, we examined physician responses to the regulation of obtaining written informed consent. Between June 1984 and February 1985 a purposive sample of 170 breast cancer specialists from eight countries completed a self-administered questionnaire and follow-up interview. The sample included 90 medical oncologists, 65 surgeons, and 29 radiotherapists. Responses to individual questions are presented in three global categories: (1) physician role--physicians believed that their view of their professional "self" was not compatible with informed consent regulations; (2) physician autonomy--physicians perceived a loss of individual decision-making power and an increase in professional accountability; and (3) physician-patient relationship--physicians stated that informed consent regulations influenced what they told trial patients and affected the ensuing doctor-patient relationship. Respondents developed complex methods to accommodate the incongruities they perceived between their view of their professional self and the need to obtain informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3621123     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870915)60:6<1415::aid-cncr2820600641>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  5 in total

Review 1.  Integrating clinical and research psychiatry.

Authors:  J M de Groot; S H Kennedy
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Anaesthetists' and surgeons' attitudes towards informed consent in the UK: an observational study.

Authors:  A A B Jamjoom; S White; S M Walton; J G Hardman; I K Moppett
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Physicians' beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care.

Authors:  M C Klein; J Kaczorowski; J M Robbins; R J Gauthier; S H Jorgensen; A K Joshi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Pediatric nephrologists' beliefs regarding randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Aaron G Wightman; Assaf P Oron; Jordan M Symons; Joseph T Flynn
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches.

Authors:  Sayeeda Rahman; Md Anwarul Azim Majumder; Sami F Shaban; Nuzhat Rahman; Moslehuddin Ahmed; Khalid Bin Abdulrahman; Urban Ja D'Souza
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2011-03-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.