| Literature DB >> 36211182 |
Poornima N Nambiar1, T P Javed Ahamed1, Sarika Sasidharan1, Lovely Catherine Mathew1, K A Salam1.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211182 PMCID: PMC9540949 DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_95_22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol ISSN: 0972-2327 Impact factor: 1.714
Figure 1Axial T2 (a), coronal T2 (b), and axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (c) magnetic resonance images showing multiple small, discrete hyperintensities in bilateral frontal subcortical white matter in fairly symmetrical distribution. Post-contrast magnetic resonance T1-weighted images (d) show no significant enhancement of the lesions
Laboratory findings
| Patient A | Patient B | Patient C | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral eosinophilia (%) | 1 | 16 | 27 |
| CSF* cells/mm3 | 450 | 510 | 310 |
| CSF differential count (%) | N8 L72 E20† | N02 L51 E47 | N01 L77 E22 |
| CSF protein (mg/dl)‡ | 40.9 | 49 | 173 |
| CSF sugar (mg/dl) | 116 | 86 | 60 |
*Cerebrospinal fluid. † N – Neutrophils L – Lymphocytes E- Eosinophils. ‡ milligram per deciliter
Figure 2Axial T2 (a) and axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (b) magnetic resonance images showing few discrete hyperintensities in bilateral frontoparietal subcortical white matter