| Literature DB >> 36211029 |
Dilfuza Jabborova1,2, Kakhramon Davranov3, Zafarjon Jabbarov2, Subrata Nath Bhowmik4, Sezai Ercisli5, Subhan Danish6, Sachidanand Singh7, Said E Desouky8, Ahmed M Elazzazy9, Omaima Nasif10, Rahul Datta11.
Abstract
Co-inoculation with beneficial microbes has been suggested as a useful practice for the enhancement of plant growth, nutrient uptake, and soil nutrients. For the first time in Uzbekistan the role of plant-growth-promoting Bacillus endophyticus IGPEB 33 and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on plant growth, the physiological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale), and soil enzymatic activities was studied. Moreover, the coinoculation of B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF treatment significantly increased the plant height by 81%, leaf number by 70%, leaf length by 82%, and leaf width by 40% compared to the control. B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 individually increased plant height significantly by 51%, leaf number by 56%, leaf length by 67%, and leaf width by 27% as compared to the control treatment. Compared to the control, B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF individually significantly increased chlorophyll a by 81-58%, chlorophyll b by 68-37%, total chlorophyll by 74-53%, and carotenoid content by 67-55%. However, combination of B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF significantly increased chlorophyll a by 86%, chlorophyll b by 72%, total chlorophyll by 82%, and carotenoid content by 83% compared to the control. Additionally, plant-growth-promoting B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF inoculation improved soil nutrients and soil enzyme activities compared to the all treatments. Co-inoculation with plant-growth-promoting B. endophyticus and AMF could be an alternative for the production of ginger that is more beneficial to soil nutrient deficiencies. We suggest that a combination of plant-growth-promoting B. endophyticus and AMF inoculation could be a more sustainable and eco-friendly approach in a nutrient-deficient soil.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36211029 PMCID: PMC9535732 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02353
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Responses of Ginger Growth Indicators to B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 Alone, AMF Alone, and a Combination of B. endophyticus IGPEB33 and AMFa
| Treatment | Height of ginger (cm) | Number of leaves per plant | Length of leaf (cm) | Width of leaf (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (uninoculated) | 8.620 ± 0.75 | 5.40 ± 0.34 | 8.02 ± 0.43 | 0.80 ± 0.01 |
| 13.02 ± 0.59* | 8.42 ± 0.41* | 10.20 ± 1.18* | 1.34 ± 0.02* | |
| AMF | 9.38 ± 0.71 | 6.00 ± 0.15 | 8.88 ± 0.12 | 0.90 ± 0.01 |
| 15.64 ± 1.22** | 9.20 ± 1.10** | 11.20 ± 0.45* | 1.46 ± 0.02** |
The asterisk indicates significant differences compared to control treatment at P < 0.05, P < 0.01. The error values specify standard deviation.
Figure 1Physiological traits of ginger plants as affected by B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF: (A) chlorophyll a; (B) chlorophyll b; (C) total chlorophyll; (D) carotenoid content. Columns marked with an asterisk differed significantly compared to control treatment at P < 0.05, P < 0.01. The error bars shows standard deviation.
Figure 2Relative water content of leaf as affected by B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF treatments. The asterisk differed significantly compared to control treatment at P < 0.05.
Agrochemical Properties in Soil as Influenced by B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMFa
| Treatment | Total P (%) | Total K (%) | Total N (%) | Humus (%) | C (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.37 ± 0.003 | 0.61 ± 0.008 | 0.08 ± 0.002 | 1.64 ± 0.015 | 0.94 ± 0.004 |
| 0.43 ± 0.010 | 0.65 ± 0.002 | 0.13 ± 0.015 | 1.78 ± 0.015 | 1.04 ± 0.002 | |
| AMF | 0.42 ± 0.003 | 0.62 ± 0.002 | 0.12 ± 0.003 | 1.767 ± 0.015 | 1.02 ± 0.002 |
| 0.45 ± 0.002 | 0.66 ± 0.002 | 0.14 ± 0.002** | 1.86 ± 0.031 | 1.08 ± 0.003 |
The asterisk indicates P < 0.05, P < 0.01. The error values specify standard deviation.
Soil Enzymes Activities as Influenced by B. endophyticus IGPEB 33 and AMF Treatmentsa
| Treatments | Activity of catalase (mL KMnO4 g –1 soil h–1) | Activity of Invertase (μg glucose·g –1 soil·h–1) | Activity of urease (NH4/g of soil/h) | Activity of phosphatase (1 μg pNP/h/g of soil) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 3.14 ± 0.02 | 4.46 ± 0.02 | 7.86 ± 0.02 | 3.75 ± 0.03 |
| 3.75 ± 0.03 | 6.62 ± 0.02 | 12.49 ± 0.05** | 5.55 ± 0.06 | |
| AMF | 3.74 ± 0.02 | 6.03 ± 0.02 | 11.43 ± 0.11 | 5.24 ± 0.05 |
| 3.95 ± 0.03 | 7.76 ± 0.05** | 14.46 ± 1.01** | 5.82 ± 0.08 |
The asterisk indicates P < 0.05, P < 0.01. The error values specify standard deviation.