| Literature DB >> 36210988 |
Jyoti A Dhanke1, Rajesh Kumar Maurya2, S Navaneethan3, Dinesh Mavaluru4, Shibili Nuhmani5, Nilamadhab Mishra6, Ellappan Venugopal7.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has rapidly grown and has made the scenario that no field can function without it. Like every field, it also plays a vital role in the sports field nowadays. In certain sports, injuries happen very often due to heavy training and sudden speedy actions, especially in athletics and football. Here arises a need to analyze the effect of physical training in sportsperson by collecting data from their daily training. With the help of artificial intelligence, a recurrent neural model is developed to analyze the effect of physical training and treatment concerning sports injury. A Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) can be a subsection of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) that uses the neural nodes connected in a temporal sequence. The temporal sequence is one of the essential terms in this research, which denotes a data sequence of events in a given timeframe. The recurrent neural model is an intelligent machine learning method that comprises a neural schema replicating humans. This neural schema studies the data it collects from the athletes/players and processes it by analyzing previous injuries. Sports injuries have to be analyzed because, in some cases, it becomes more dangerous to the sportsperson that they may even lose their career due to disability. Sometimes it may cause a massive loss to the club or company that hired the sportsperson for the sport. The prediction process can give the player rest until he recovers, thus becoming the safest approach in sports. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the sportsperson's track data to keep an eye on his health. In this research, RNN model is compared with the existing Support Vector Machine (SVM) in concerning to the effect of physical training and treatment for sports. The results show that the proposed model has achieved 99% accuracy, which is higher than the existing algorithm.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36210988 PMCID: PMC9546649 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1359714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Proposed recurrent model for prediction and analysis of sports injuries.
Figure 2The computation accuracy of measurement weight results is compared.
Analyze the effect of physical training and treatment on sports injuries using a result analysis. Precision in computing.
| Effect of physical training and treatment in relation to sports | Recurrent Neural Network model (%) | Support Vector Machine (%) | Fuzzy set based on hesitation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36 | 85 | 83 | 81 |
| 38 | 87 | 86 | 85 |
| 40 | 89 | 78 | 83 |
| 42 | 90 | 89 | 82 |
| 44 | 96 | 92 | 94 |
| 46 | 98 | 94 | 87 |
| 48 | 99 | 88 | 88 |
Figure 3The effect of physical training and treatment on neural network accuracy but also loss in sports using the BP algorithm.
Figure 4Performance evaluation of human activity recognition.
Analysis for the result indifferent physical education the training set in sport treatment.
| Precision (%) | Recall (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Various physical education | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.99 |
| Human sports activity | 0.91 | 0.86 | 0.97 |
Figure 5Analysis of evaluation score comparison results in sport training and treatment in physical education.
Comparison result analysis for different algorithm in the effect of physical training and treatment in relation to sports injuries.
| Effect of physical training and treatment | Recurrent Neural Network model (%) | Support Vector Machine (%) | Fuzzy set based on hesitation (%) | Expert score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–5 | 85 | 84 | 83 | 93 |
| 5–10 | 98 | 96 | 89 | 94 |
| 10–15 | 93 | 83 | 94 | 89 |
| 15–20 | 94 | 93 | 86 | 94 |
| 20–25 | 85 | 86 | 85 | 92 |
| 25–30 | 97 | 84 | 96 | 84 |
| 30–35 | 98 | 92 | 93 | 82 |
Figure 6Analysis for result in the physical training and treatment.
Figure 7The thorough outcomes of sports training and treatment are critical.