| Literature DB >> 36210984 |
Yanyan Qiu1, Chunbo Qiu1.
Abstract
In order to explore how to realize home care for the elderly with mobility difficulties, this paper proposes a home care system for the elderly with mobility difficulties based on intelligent perception. This method explores the research of home care for mobility disabilities by recommending key technical problems and solutions based on information represented by intelligent perception. The research shows that the home care system based on intelligent perception can effectively solve the nursing problems of the elderly, which is about 60% more efficient than the traditional methods. The combination of intelligent perception and reasonable home care mode will improve the social and economic benefits of health services and promote the balance between supply and demand of the whole health services.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36210984 PMCID: PMC9546658 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9528046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Intelligent induction home care system.
Determination of health needs of individuals and medical experts.
| Medical experts | Individual | |
|---|---|---|
| Have health needs | No health needs | |
| Have health needs | A | B |
| Medical experts | C | D |
Health classification of patients in Japanese nursing care service.
| Grade | Health |
|---|---|
| Need help | Basically have the ability of daily living, but some help is needed for bathing, etc |
| Level 1 care | Unstable standing or walking, excretion, bathing, etc. need some help |
| Level 2 care | Difficulty in standing, excretion, etc. need help |
| Level 3 care | Unable to stand, turning over, excreting, bathing, dressing, etc. need help completely |
| Level 4 care | Rely on others for excretion, bathing, dressing, etc |
| Level 5 care | Rely on others in daily life |
Karnofsky performance status,KPS.
| Behavioral capacity status | Level | |
|---|---|---|
| Normal, without symptoms and signs | 100 | The activity or working ability is basically normal, and there is no special care need |
| Able to perform normal activities, with mild symptoms and signs | 90 | |
|
| ||
| Barely able to perform normal activities, with some symptoms or signs | 80 | Unable to work, basically competent for personal care, only partial assistance is required |
| You can take care of yourself, but you cannot maintain normal life and work | 70 | |
Coriolis scale.
| Behavioral capacity status | Level |
|---|---|
| Fully mobile without any restrictions | 0 |
| Able to walk and maintain light work, such as simple housework, but limited to physical exertion activities | 1 |
| Able to walk and maintain self-care, but unable to work or housework | 2 |
| More than 50% of the time when you are awake, you can get up and do not have to limit your activities to bed or chair | 3 |
| Can only maintain limited self-care, more than 50% of the waking time, activities are limited to bed or chair 3, completely unable to move, cannot take any self-care, and completely limited to bed or chair | 4 |
Physical health level.
| Excellent: often or occasionally engage in intense sports |
|---|
| Good: no obvious disease or disability, only receive routine medical care, such as physical examination once a year |
| Mild disorder: only mild disease or disability, which can be improved by treatment or corrective measures |
| Moderate disorder: one or more disorders, if not very painful, require continuous medical care |
| Severe disorder: there are one or more kinds of disabilities. The injury is either very painful and life-threatening, or it needs extensive treatment |
| Completely disabled: lying in bed and requiring 24-hour medical assistance or nursing care to maintain life |
Judgment basis and quantification of influence degree.
| Judgment basis | Impact on expert judgment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Large | Middle | Small | |
| Understanding of the current situation of community home nursing in China | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Understanding of the current situation of community home care in the United States | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Frequency of self-evaluation of expert judgment basis.
| Judgment basis | Large | Middle | Small |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | Frequency (%) | |
| Understanding of the current situation of community home nursing in China | 9 (56.25) | 7 (43.75) | 0 (0) |
| Understanding of the current situation of community home care in the United States | 2 (12.50) | 10 (62.50) | 4 (25.00) |
Distribution of the number of experts based on self-evaluation.
| Ci = 1.0 | 2 |
|---|---|
| Ci = 0.9 | 7 |
| Ci = 0.8 | 6 |
| Ci = 0.7 | 1 |
Frequency of self-evaluation of experts' familiarity.
| Index | Familiarity frequency (%) | Familiar frequency (%) | General frequency (%) | Less familiar frequency (%) | Frequency of not knowing (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursing operation technology | 14 (87.5) | 2 (12.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Health status of the elderly | 10 (62.5) | 6 (37.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Expert familiarity self-assessment results.
| Score | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of experts | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Coordination degree of expert consultation of family nursing service project.
| Index | Number of indicators | Kenda11's W |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First round | 96 | 0.644 | 979.323 | <0.00 |
| Second round | 114 | 0.866 | 1566.126 | <0.00 |
Distribution of the number of elderly patients.
| Number of sickness | Number of people | % | Cumulative percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 15 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 | 91 | 18.2 | 21.2 |
| 2 | 174 | 34.8 | 56.0 |
| 3 | 100 | 20.0 | 76.0 |
| 4 | 72 | 14.4 | 90.4 |
| 5+ | 48 | 9.6 | 100.0 |
| Total | 500 | 100 |
Figure 2Factor number and eigenvalue steep slope diagram.
Responses to two rounds of expert consultation.
| Total number of experts | Number of responding experts | Response rate RR (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| First round | 16 | 16 | 100 |
| Second round | 16 | 16 | 100 |