Literature DB >> 36209324

Prognosis of Patients with Cutaneous Angiosarcoma After Surgical Resection with Curative Intent: Is There a Difference Between the Subtypes?

Sophie J M Reijers1, Eva A Huis In 't Veld2, Dirk J Grünhagen3, Myles J F Smith4, Tessa M van Ginhoven3, Frits van Coevorden1, Winette T A van der Graaf5,6, Yvonne Schrage1, Dirk C Strauss4, Rick L M Haas7,8, Cornelis J Verhoef3, Andrew J Hayes4, Winan J van Houdt9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The etiology of cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS) may be idiopathic (I-cAS), or arise secondary to radiotherapy (RT-cAS), in chronic lymphedema (ST-cAS), or related to UV exposure (UV-cAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate oncological outcomes of different cAS subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Non-metastatic cAS patients, treated with surgery for primary disease with curative intent, were retrospectively analyzed for oncological outcome, including local recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were identified; 60 I-cAS, 122 RT-cAS, 9 ST-cAS, and 43 UV-cAS. The majority was female (78%), the median age was 66 years (IQR 57-76 years), the median tumor size was 4.4 cm (IQR 2.5-7.0 cm), and most common site of disease was the breast (59%). Recurrence was identified in 66% (44% LR and/or 41% DM), with a median follow up of 26.5 months (IQR 12-60 months). The 5-year OS was estimated at 50%, LRFS at 47%, and DMFS at 50%. There was no significant difference in LR, DM, or OS between the subtypes. Age < 65 years and administration of radiotherapy (RT) were significantly associated with lower LR rates (HR 0.560, 95% CI 0.3373-0.840, p = 0.005 and HR 0.421, 95% CI 0.225-0.790, p = 0.007, respectively), however no prognostic factors were identified for development of DM. Development of DM, but not LR (p = 0.052), was significantly associated with decreased OS (HR 6.486, 95% CI 2.939-14.318 p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in oncological outcome between the different cAS subtypes. OS remains relatively poor, and RT is associated with lower LR rates.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36209324     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12601-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  4 in total

1.  Secondary angiosarcoma: A fatal complication of chronic lymphedema.

Authors:  Farhad Farzaliyev; Rainer Hamacher; Hans-Ulrich Steinau Professor; Stefanie Bertram; Lars Erik Podleska
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment.

Authors:  Jun Cao; Jiale Wang; Chiyu He; Meiyu Fang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Intensification of Treatment for Angiosarcoma of the Breast with Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiation, Hyperthermia, and Surgical Resection.

Authors:  Jason K Molitoris; Arpit Chhabra; James W Snider; Nicole Harvilla; Nkechi Okonkwo; Elizabeth M Nichols; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Olga B Ioffe; Susan B Kesmodel; Steven J Feigenberg
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-28

4.  Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors in angiosarcoma: A retrospective analysis of 200 patients from a single Chinese medical institute.

Authors:  Lei Wang; I Weng Lao; Lin Yu; Jian Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.967

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Multimodality Treatment of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma.

Authors:  Sophie J M Reijers; Winan J van Houdt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-16       Impact factor: 4.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.