| Literature DB >> 36209252 |
Yihui Cai1,2, Ligong Zhai2, Xiaoman Fang3, Kangping Wu1, Yuhuan Liu4, Xian Cui1, Yunpu Wang1, Zhigang Yu5, Roger Ruan6, Tongying Liu7, Qi Zhang8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microalgae protein is considered as a sustainable alternative to animal protein in the future. Using waste for microalgal culture can upgrade low-value raw materials into high-value products, helping to offset the cost of microalgal protein production. In this study we explored the feasibility of using microalgae heterotrophic fermentation to convert broken rice hydrolysate (BRH) into protein.Entities:
Keywords: Amino acid; Broken rice hydrolysate; Chlorella vulgaris; Heterotrophic; Protein
Year: 2022 PMID: 36209252 PMCID: PMC9547431 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02204-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod ISSN: 2731-3654
Fig. 1Effects of BRH supplemental ratio on the growth of C. vulgaris. a Biomass production; (b) Reducing sugar concentration of culture media; (c) TOC concentration of culture media; (d) TN concentration of culture media. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean of three replicates
Consumption of nutrients in the media and the protein content of microalgae
| Biomass productivity (g/L/day) | Reducing sugar consumption rate (%) | TOC consumption rate (%) | TN consumption rate (%) | Protein content (%) | Protein productivity(g/L/day) | Growth yield (g biomass/g TOC) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRH supplemental amount | |||||||
| 5% | 0.34 ± 0.01c | 100 ± 0.00a | 90.02 ± 0.06a | 48.53 ± 0.38d | 58.51 ± 0.01a | 0.20 ± 0.01c | 1.23 ± 0.05a |
| 10% | 0.58 ± 0.02b | 100 ± 0.00a | 86.61 ± 0.03ab | 74.76 ± 0.99b | 56.25 ± 0.50b | 0.33 ± 0.01b | 1.06 ± 0.05b |
| 15% | 1.00 ± 0.01a | 98.86 ± 0.00ab | 87.46 ± 0.30b | 79.36 ± 0.52a | 40.64 ± 0.01d | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 1.22 ± 0.01a |
| 20% | 1.08 ± 0.06a | 87.75 ± 5.17b | 76.22 ± 1.64c | 78.10 ± 0.27ab | 38.41 ± 0.15e | 0.42 ± 0.03a | 1.17 ± 0.07ab |
| 25% | 1.06 ± 0.10a | 71.19 ± 2.93c | 23.91 ± 0.56d | 66.81 ± 2.11c | 42.55 ± 0.50c | 0.45 ± 0.06a | 1.19 ± 0.14ab |
| C/N ratio | |||||||
| 5:1 | 0.94 ± 0.02bc | 100 ± 0.00a | 81.53 ± 0.19b | 14.20 ± 2.29f | 58.26 ± 0.14c | 0.55 ± 0.01a | 1.28 ± 0.04ab |
| 7:1 | 0.96 ± 0.02ab | 100 ± 0.00a | 84.25 ± 1.03a | 40.21 ± 0.77e | 57.31 ± 0.06d | 0.55 ± 0.01a | 1.29 ± 0.02ab |
| 9:1 | 0.93 ± 0.02b,c | 100 ± 0.00a | 84.12 ± 0.28a | 56.78 ± 0.51c | 59.71 ± 0.11b | 0.56 ± 0.01a | 1.22 ± 0.03ab |
| 12:1 | 0.90 ± 0.02bc | 100 ± 0.00a | 83.74 ± 0.15a | 74.20 ± 0.28a | 61.56 ± 0.23a | 0.54 ± 0.02ab | 1.19 ± 0.02b |
| 19:1 | 1.00 ± 0.03a | 100 ± 0.00a | 84.04 ± 0.42a | 77.87 ± 0.88a | 38.73 ± 0.13e | 0.39 ± 0.01c | 1.29 ± 0.06ab |
| 23:1 | 0.89 ± 0.02c | 88.27 ± 0.01b | 76.23 ± 0.39c | 74.84 ± 0.80a | 32.29 ± 0.31f | 0.29 ± 0.01d | 1.25 ± 0.04ab |
| 32:1 | 0.68 ± 0.02d | 62.29 ± 0.75c | 55.75 ± 0.39d | 67.93 ± 1.57b | 27.61 ± 0.36 g | 0.19 ± 0.01e | 1.32 ± 0.06a |
| 48:1 | 0.24 ± 0.01e | 23.69 ± 0.20d | 23.86 ± 0.64e | 52.15 ± 1.40d | 37.92 ± 0.47e | 0.07 ± 0.01f | 1.09 ± 0.04c |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviations (n = 3). Different lowercase superscript letters in the same column represent statistical difference (P < 0.05) on a particular property
Fig. 2Effects of C/N ratio on the growth of C. vulgaris and nutrient components of media. a Biomass production; (b) Reducing sugar consumption in media; (c) TOC consumption in media; (d) Changes of IC concentration in media; (e) Changes of TN concentration in media; (f) Changes of TOC/TN in media. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean of three replicates
Fig. 3Effects of C/N ratio on the size and sedimentation of microalgal cells. a Size of microalgal cells; (b) Sedimentation of microalgal cells; (c) Zeta potential of microalgal cells. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean of three replicates
Fig. 4Effect of C/N ratio on the composition of microalgal cell
Fig. 5Mechanism of influence of C/N ratio on protein accumulation in C. vulgaris cells. a Changes in amino acid content; (b) Regulation mechanism of C/N ratio on amino acid and protein accumulation
Comparative nutritional profile of protein in heterotrophic Chlorella vulgaris and soybean
| Parameter | Heterotrophic | Soybean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C/N = 5:1 | C/N = 12:1 | C/N = 32:1 | ||
| Total essential amino acids without histidine | 19.61 ± 0.07a | 19.37 ± 0.11a | 10.92 ± 0.04c | 17.09 ± 0.01b |
| Total non-essential amino acids | 29.22 ± 0.04a | 26.97 ± 0.11b | 14.82 ± 0.05c | 26.76 ± 0.06b |
| Total amino acids | 48.83 ± 0.11a | 46.34 ± 0.23b | 25.74 ± 0.09d | 43.85 ± 0.06c |
| E/T (%) | 40.16 ± 0.05c | 41.80 ± 0.04b | 42.43 ± 0.01a | 38.97 ± 0.06d |
| BV | 84.87 ± 0.33a | 85.39 ± 0.01a | 83.29 ± 0.67a | 84.25 ± 0.91a |
| EAAI | 88.60 ± 0.31a | 89.07 ± 0.01a | 87.15 ± 0.61a | 88.03 ± 0.84a |
| Total Sulphur containing amino acids | 0.75 ± 0.02a | 0.78 ± 0.01a | 0.36 ± 0.02b | 0.62 ± 0.05a |
| Total essential amino acids with histidine | 20.60 ± 0.08a | 20.36 ± 0.13a | 11.46 ± 0.05c | 18.23 ± 0.00b |
| Total neutral amino acids | 28.15 ± 0.06a | 27.68 ± 0.15b | 15.25 ± 0.05c | 23.38 ± 0.01d |
| Total aromatic acids | 3.96 ± 0.03a | 3.95 ± 0.03a | 2.04 ± 0.01c | 3.73 ± 0.00b |
| Total hydroxylic amino acids | 4.61 ± 0.02a | 4.43 ± 0.01b | 2.58 ± 0.01d | 4.02 ± 0.01c |
| Total acidic amino acids | 11.39 ± 0.01b | 10.29 ± 0.01c | 5.74 ± 0.02d | 13.34 ± 0.03a |
| Total basic amino acids | 9.30 ± 0.05a | 8.37 ± 0.07b | 4.75 ± 0.02d | 7.12 ± 0.02c |
| Leucine/isoleucine ratio (BCAA) | 2.90 ± 0.01a | 2.90 ± 0.01a | 2.83 ± 0.01b | 2.38 ± 0.01c |
| Lysine/arginine ratio | 1.03 ± 0.01c | 1.21 ± 0.01b | 1.52 ± 0.01a | 0.84 ± 0.00d |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Means in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Culture medium cost to produce 1 kg of biomass
| Chemicals | Unit pricea (USD/kg) | Amountb (g) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRH group | Glucose group | ||
| NaNO3 | 0.57 | 243 | 243 |
| K2HPO4 | 1.48 | 6.48 | 6.48 |
| MgSO4·7H2O | 0.07 | 12.15 | 12.15 |
| CaCl2·2H20 | 0.35 | 5.83 | 5.83 |
| Citric acid | 2.19 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| Ferric ammonium citrate | 7.98 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| EDTA·2Na | 4.36 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| Na2CO3 | 0.38 | 3.24 | 3.24 |
| A5 | 1.48 | 73.55 | 97.36 |
| α-Amylase | 1.19 | 60.00 | 0 |
| Glucoamylase | 0.69 | 160.00 | 0 |
| Glucose | 0.30 | 0 | 3200 |
| Broken rice | 0.57 | 2370 | 0 |
| Total costc (USD) | 1.14 | 2.36 | |
aThe unit price is determined according to the minimum price in Wangsheng raw material trading platform in China (https://www.rawmex.cn/) in August 2022 (1.00 USD = 6.77 CNY)
bThe amount of chemicals required to produce 1 kg of biomass
cTotal cost is calculated based on the amount and unit price of various chemicals required to produce 1 kg of biomass