Literature DB >> 36208395

Postoperative coronal malalignment after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and impact on 2-year outcomes.

Scott L Zuckerman1,2, Christopher S Lai1, Yong Shen1, Nathan J Lee1, Mena G Kerolus1, Alex S Ha1, Ian A Buchanan1, Eric Leung1, Meghan Cerpa3, Ronald A Lehman1, Lawrence G Lenke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with postoperative coronal malalignment.
METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of ASD patients undergoing ≥ 6 level fusions from 2015 to 2019 was undertaken. The primary outcome was postoperative coronal malalignment, defined as C7-coronal vertical axis (CVA) > 3 cm. Secondary outcomes included: complications, readmissions, reoperations, and 2-year PROs.
RESULTS: A total of 243 ASD patients undergoing spinal surgery had preoperative and immediate postoperative measurements, and 174 patients (72%) had 2-year follow-up. Mean age was 49.3 ± 18.3yrs and mean instrumented levels was 13.5 ± 3.9. Mean preoperative CVA was 2.9 ± 2.7 cm, and 90 (37%) had preoperative coronal malalignment. Postoperative coronal malalignment occurred in 43 (18%) patients. Significant risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment were: preoperative CVA (OR 1.21, p = 0.001), preoperative SVA (OR 1.05, p = 0.046), pelvic obliquity (OR 1.21; p = 0.008), Qiu B vs. A (OR 4.17; p = 0.003), Qiu C vs. A (OR 7.39; p < 0.001), lumbosacral fractional (LSF) curve (OR 2.31; p = 0.021), max Cobb angle concavity opposite the CVA (OR 2.10; p = 0.033), and operative time (OR 1.16; p = 0.045). Postoperative coronal malalignment patients were more likely to sustain a major complication (31% vs. 14%; p = 0.01), yet no differences were seen in readmissions (p = 0.72) or reoperations (p = 0.98). No significant differences were seen in 2-year PROs (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative coronal malalignment occurred in 18% of ASD patients and was most associated with preoperative CVA/SVA, pelvic obliquity, Qiu B/C curves, LSF curve concavity to the same side as the CVA, and maximum Cobb angle concavity opposite side of the CVA. Postoperative coronal malalignment was significantly associated with increased complications but not readmission, reoperation, or 2-year PROs.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spine deformity; Coronal malalignment; Patient reported outcomes; Postoperative outcomes; Spine surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36208395     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00583-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  10 in total

1.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

2.  Multicenter assessment of surgical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with severe global coronal malalignment: determination of target coronal realignment threshold.

Authors:  Thomas J Buell; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Han Jo Kim; Eric O Klineberg; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Peter G Passias; Gregory M Mundis; Robert K Eastlack; Vedat Deviren; Michael P Kelly; Alan H Daniels; Jeffrey L Gum; Alex Soroceanu; D Kojo Hamilton; Munish C Gupta; Douglas C Burton; Richard A Hostin; Khaled M Kebaish; Robert A Hart; Frank J Schwab; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2020-12-04

3.  Rates and risk factors associated with 30- and 90-day readmissions and reoperations after spinal fusions for adult lumbar degenerative pathology and spinal deformity.

Authors:  Kevin Taliaferro; Aditya Rao; Alekos A Theologis; Daniel Cummins; Matthew Callahan; Sigurd H Berven
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-11-30

4.  Surgical anatomy of minimally invasive lateral approaches to the thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  David S Xu; Corey T Walker; S Harrison Farber; Jakub Godzik; Shashank V Gandhi; Robert M Koffie; Jay D Turner; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Evaluation of the Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Masayoshi Fukushima; Hiroyuki Oka; Yasushi Oshima; Yohei Yuzawa; Ko Matsudaira; Sakae Tanaka; Hirohiko Inanami
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  The "kickstand rod" technique for correction of coronal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity: initial case series.

Authors:  Melvin C Makhni; Ying Zhang; Paul J Park; Meghan Cerpa; Ming Yang; Martin H Pham; J Alex Sielatycki; Eduardo C Beauchamp; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2019-11-29

7.  What Does Your PROMIS Score Mean? Improving the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes at the Point of Care.

Authors:  Jeremy D Shaw; Ross McEntarfer; Jason Ferrel; Natasha Greene; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Brandon D Lawrence; William R Spiker; Nicholas Spina; Darrel S Brodke
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-14

8.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Early Postoperative Complications and Mortality Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program From 2011 to 2013.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Scott L Zuckerman; Meghan Cerpa; Jin S Yeom; Ronald A Lehman; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.876

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.