Qiufan Zheng1, Hanjia Luo1, Wen Xia1, Qianyi Lu1, Kuikui Jiang1, Ruoxi Hong1, Fei Xu1, Shusen Wang2. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, China. wangshs@sysucc.org.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approaches in pN0 breast cancer patients in real-world setting remains uncertain. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with pathologically staged T1-2N0M0 breast cancer between 2000 and 2015 in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18-registry database. Patients were considered to have undergone SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. Propensity score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to minimize treatment selection bias. RESULTS: We included 309,430 patients (253,501 SLNB and 55,929 ALND). In the weighted cohort, ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.16) and BCSS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10-1.22) compared with SLNB alone. Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB when compared with ALND. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings. CONCLUSION: We found statistically significant differences in OS and BCSS between SLNB and ALND, though the magnitude of these differences was small. Our findings further support that SLNB alone should be the standard of care for patients who do not have metastatic lymph nodes identified during breast cancer surgery.
PURPOSE: Findings from randomized clinical trials have shown that survival in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative breast cancer is noninferior with SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone versus further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, the long-term outcome of these two surgical approaches in pN0 breast cancer patients in real-world setting remains uncertain. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with pathologically staged T1-2N0M0 breast cancer between 2000 and 2015 in surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18-registry database. Patients were considered to have undergone SLNB alone if they had ≤ 5 examined lymph nodes (ELNs), and ALND if they had ≥ 10 ELNs. The outcomes included overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival. Propensity score analyses by weighting and matching and multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to minimize treatment selection bias. RESULTS: We included 309,430 patients (253,501 SLNB and 55,929 ALND). In the weighted cohort, ALND was associated with significantly lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.16) and BCSS (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10-1.22) compared with SLNB alone. Both the propensity score-matching model and multivariable Cox model demonstrated a survival benefit for SLNB when compared with ALND. Subgroup analyses for key variables did not change these findings. CONCLUSION: We found statistically significant differences in OS and BCSS between SLNB and ALND, though the magnitude of these differences was small. Our findings further support that SLNB alone should be the standard of care for patients who do not have metastatic lymph nodes identified during breast cancer surgery.
Authors: Giorgio Zavagno; Gian Luca De Salvo; Giuliano Scalco; Fernando Bozza; Luca Barutta; Paola Del Bianco; Marco Renier; Carlo Racano; Paolo Carraro; Donato Nitti Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Anand David Purushotham; Sara Upponi; Manfred Borislav Klevesath; Lynda Bobrow; Keith Millar; Jonathan Peter Myles; Stephen William Duffy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David N Krag; Stewart J Anderson; Thomas B Julian; Ann M Brown; Seth P Harlow; Joseph P Costantino; Takamaru Ashikaga; Donald L Weaver; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Lynne M Jalovec; Thomas G Frazier; R Dirk Noyes; André Robidoux; Hugh Mc Scarth; Norman Wolmark Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Umberto Veronesi; Giuseppe Viale; Giovanni Paganelli; Stefano Zurrida; Alberto Luini; Viviana Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Mattia Intra; Patrick Maisonneuve; Francesca Zucca; Giovanna Gatti; Giovanni Mazzarol; Concetta De Cicco; Dario Vezzoli Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giovanna Gatti; Giovanni Mazzarol; Concetta De Cicco; Gianfranco Manfredi; Julia Rodríguez Fernández Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Robert E Mansel; Lesley Fallowfield; Mark Kissin; Amit Goyal; Robert G Newcombe; J Michael Dixon; Constantinos Yiangou; Kieran Horgan; Nigel Bundred; Ian Monypenny; David England; Mark Sibbering; Tholkifl I Abdullah; Lester Barr; Utheshtra Chetty; Dudley H Sinnett; Anne Fleissig; Dayalan Clarke; Peter J Ell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Roberto Agresti; Gabriele Martelli; Marco Sandri; Elda Tagliabue; Maria Luisa Carcangiu; Ilaria Maugeri; Cristina Pellitteri; Cristina Ferraris; Giuseppe Capri; Angela Moliterni; Giulia Bianchi; Gabriella Mariani; Giovanna Trecate; Laura Lozza; Martin Langer; Mario Rampa; Massimiliano Gennaro; Marco Greco; Sylvie Menard; Marco A Pierotti Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: G Canavese; A Catturich; C Vecchio; D Tomei; M Gipponi; G Villa; F Carli; P Bruzzi; B Dozin Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Gary H Lyman; Mark R Somerfield; Linda D Bosserman; Cheryl L Perkins; Donald L Weaver; Armando E Giuliano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Chris Robertson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Concetta De Cicco; Francesca De Lucia; Roberto Gennari Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-07 Impact factor: 91.245