Literature DB >> 36207497

Effect of radioactivity outside the field of view on image quality of dedicated breast positron emission tomography: preliminary phantom and clinical studies.

Yoko Satoh1,2, Masamichi Imai3, Chihiro Ikegawa3, Kenji Hirata4, Norifumi Abo5, Mao Kusuzaki6, Noriko Oyama-Manabe7, Hiroshi Onishi8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Semi-quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) values, such as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), are widely used to identify malignant lesions and evaluate the response to treatment. The image quality of ring-shaped dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) has been known to decrease the closer it is to the detector's edge. This study aimed to investigate the effect of radioactivity (RI) outside the detector field of view (FOV) on the image quality of the ring-shaped dbPET.
METHODS: A breast phantom containing the left myocardium, which was prepared using a 3D printer, filled with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) solution with various RI concentration ratios (RCRs) of myocardium to background and scanned with the edge of an apex positioned exactly in line with the edge of the FOV of the dbPET scanner. The phantom image quality was visually and quantitatively evaluated. Following the phantom study, left-right breast differences (the left breast uptake ratio to the right breast (LUR)) on clinical dbPET images of 74 women were quantitatively evaluated. The relationships between these parameters, clinical indices, and FDG uptake in the left myocardium on PET/computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed.
RESULTS: The phantom study showed that the higher the RCR of the myocardium and the closer it is to the top edge of the phantom, the higher is the pixel value of the dbPET images. In a clinical study, LUR was significantly correlated with myocardial SUVmax (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001) and metabolic myocardial volume (r = 0.63, p = 0.001) for whole-body PET/CT imaging. Although no significant correlations were found between LUR and age (r = 0.05, p = 0.6865), body mass index (r = 0.03, p = 0.8178), or distance between the left myocardial apex and chest wall (r = 0.16, p = 0.1667).
CONCLUSIONS: FDG uptake in the myocardium affected dbPET images of the left breast, especially near the chest wall. Further, the effect of RI outside the FOV, such as in the myocardium, must be considered in the quantitative evaluation of breast cancer using dbPET.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; Dedicated breast positron emission tomography; Myocardial uptake; Phantom; Radioactivity outside the field-of-view (FOV)

Year:  2022        PMID: 36207497     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01789-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.258


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.

Authors:  Yoko Satoh; Utaroh Motosugi; Masamichi Imai; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  A convolution-subtraction scatter correction method for 3D PET.

Authors:  D L Bailey; S R Meikle
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography in the detection of small and low-grade breast cancer.

Authors:  Satoshi Sueoka; Shinsuke Sasada; Norio Masumoto; Akiko Emi; Takayuki Kadoya; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A complementary scheme for automated detection of high-uptake regions on dedicated breast PET and whole-body PET/CT.

Authors:  Natsuki Minoura; Atsushi Teramoto; Akari Ito; Osamu Yamamuro; Masami Nishio; Kuniaki Saito; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2019-05-25

5.  Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards.

Authors:  Kanae K Miyake; Keiichi Matsumoto; Mika Inoue; Yuji Nakamoto; Shotaro Kanao; Tae Oishi; Shigeto Kawase; Keishi Kitamura; Yoshiyuki Yamakawa; Ayako Akazawa; Tetsuya Kobayashi; Junichi Ohi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Cancer statistics, 2020.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.

Authors:  Philipp Heusch; Christian Buchbender; Karsten Beiderwellen; Felix Nensa; Verena Hartung-Knemeyer; Thomas C Lauenstein; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Forsting; Gerald Antoch; Till A Heusner
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 8.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Staging and Restaging of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux; Alexandre Cochet; Olivier Humbert; Jean-Louis Alberini; Elif Hindié; David Mankoff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Whole-body total lesion glycolysis measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography as a prognostic variable in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Yoko Satoh; Atsushi Nambu; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Yoko Satoh; Utaroh Motosugi; Masamichi Imai; Yoshie Omiya; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.