Literature DB >> 36206390

Sex differences in contextual fear learning and generalization: a behavioral and computational analysis of hippocampal functioning.

Jeremy M Trott1,2,3, Franklin B Krasne1,2,3, Michael S Fanselow1,2,3.   

Abstract

There are sex differences in anxiety disorders with regard to occurrence and severity of episodes such that females tend to experience more frequent and more severe episodes. Contextual fear learning and generalization are especially relevant to anxiety disorders, which are often defined by expressing fear and/or anxiety in safe contexts. In contextual fear conditioning, a representation of the context must first be created, and then that representation must be paired with an aversive consequence. With some variation, the experiments presented here use a 3-d procedure in which day 1 consists of pre-exposure to the to-be-shocked context, day 2 consists of a single context-shock pairing after some placement-to-shock interval (PSI), and day 3 consists of testing in either the same or a novel context. With shorter pre-exposure periods, male rats showed more contextual fear, consistent with previous literature; however, after longer pre-exposure periods, female rats showed greater contextual fear. Additionally, while pre-exposure and PSI are both periods of time prior to the shock, it was found that they were not equivalent to each other. Animals with 120 sec of pre-exposure and a 30-sec PSI show a differential level and time course of fear expression than animals who received no pre-exposure and a 150-sec PSI, and this further depended on sex of the rat. Additionally, an experiment comparing recently versus remotely acquired contextual fear was run. Males were again shown to have greater contextual fear at both time points, and this contextual fear incubated/increased over time in males but not females. To facilitate identification of what processes caused sex differences, we used BaconX, a conceptual and computational model of hippocampal contextual learning. Computational simulations using this model predicted many of our key findings. Furthermore, these simulations suggest potential mechanisms with regard to hippocampal computation; namely, an increased feature sampling rate in males, which may account for the sex differences presented here and in prior literature.
© 2022 Trott et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36206390      PMCID: PMC9488020          DOI: 10.1101/lm.053515.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.699


  55 in total

1.  Contextual fear conditioning, conjunctive representations, pattern completion, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  J W Rudy; R C O'Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  New circuits for old memories: the role of the neocortex in consolidation.

Authors:  Brian J Wiltgen; Robert A M Brown; Lynn E Talton; Alcino J Silva
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear.

Authors:  J J Kim; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Latent inhibition.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Synaptic plasticity in the basolateral amygdala induced by hippocampal formation stimulation in vivo.

Authors:  S Maren; M S Fanselow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sex differences in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: positive correlation between LTP and contextual learning.

Authors:  S Maren; B De Oca; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Trace and contextual fear conditioning is enhanced in mice lacking the alpha4 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor.

Authors:  M D Moore; J Cushman; D Chandra; G E Homanics; R W Olsen; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Effects of exposure to a to-be-shocked environment upon the rat's freezing response: evidence for facilitation, latent inhibition, and perceptual learning.

Authors:  M J Kiernan; R F Westbrook
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1993-08

9.  Conditioning- and time-dependent increases in context fear and generalization.

Authors:  Andrew M Poulos; Nehali Mehta; Bryan Lu; Dorsa Amir; Briana Livingston; Anthony Santarelli; Irina Zhuravka; Michael S Fanselow
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Sex Differences in Remote Contextual Fear Generalization in Mice.

Authors:  Arun Asok; Joud Hijazi; Lucas R Harvey; Stylianos Kosmidis; Eric R Kandel; Joseph B Rayman
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.