Literature DB >> 36204530

Fully Automated and Explainable Liver Segmental Volume Ratio and Spleen Segmentation at CT for Diagnosing Cirrhosis.

Perry J Pickhardt1, Ronald M Summers1, Sungwon Lee1, Daniel C Elton1, Alexander H Yang1, Christopher Koh1, David E Kleiner1, Meghan G Lubner1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model that measures the liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR) (ie, the volumes of Couinaud segments I-III/IV-VIII) and spleen volumes from CT scans to predict cirrhosis and advanced fibrosis. Materials and
Methods: For this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, retrospective study, two datasets were used. Dataset 1 consisted of patients with hepatitis C who underwent liver biopsy (METAVIR F0-F4, 2000-2016). Dataset 2 consisted of patients who had cirrhosis from other causes who underwent liver biopsy (Ishak 0-6, 2001-2021). Whole liver, LSVR, and spleen volumes were measured with contrast-enhanced CT by radiologists and the DL model. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for diagnosing advanced fibrosis (≥METAVIR F2 or Ishak 3) and cirrhosis (≥METAVIR F4 or Ishak 5) were calculated. Multivariable models were built on dataset 1 and tested on datasets 1 (hold out) and 2.
Results: Datasets 1 and 2 consisted of 406 patients (median age, 50 years [IQR, 44-56 years]; 297 men) and 207 patients (median age, 50 years [IQR, 41-57 years]; 147 men), respectively. In dataset 1, the prediction of cirrhosis was similar between the manual versus automated measurements for spleen volume (AUC, 0.86 [95% CI: 0.82, 0.9] vs 0.85 [95% CI: 0.81, 0.89]; significantly noninferior, P < .001) and LSVR (AUC, 0.83 [95% CI: 0.78, 0.87] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.84]; P < .001). The best performing multivariable model achieved AUCs of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.99) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.87) for cirrhosis and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.91) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.78) for advanced fibrosis in datasets 1 and 2, respectively.
Conclusion: The CT-based DL model performed similarly to radiologists. LSVR and splenic volume were predictive of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.Keywords: CT, Liver, Cirrhosis, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.
© 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Cirrhosis; Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis; Liver

Year:  2022        PMID: 36204530      PMCID: PMC9530761          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  27 in total

1.  Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity.

Authors:  B E Van Beers; I Leconte; R Materne; A M Smith; J Jamart; Y Horsmans
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Diagnosing fibrosis in hepatitis C: is the pendulum swinging from biopsy to blood tests?

Authors:  Nezam H Afdhal
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Determination of splenomegaly by CT: is there a place for a single measurement?

Authors:  Alexandre S Bezerra; Giuseppe D'Ippolito; Salomão Faintuch; Jacob Szejnfeld; Muneeb Ahmed
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Liver Surface Nodularity Quantification from Routine CT Images as a Biomarker for Detection and Evaluation of Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Andrew D Smith; Cody R Branch; Kevin Zand; Charu Subramony; Haowei Zhang; Katherine Thaggard; Richard Hosch; Jason Bryan; Amit Vasanji; Michael Griswold; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection.

Authors:  Arie Regev; Mariana Berho; Lennox J Jeffers; Clara Milikowski; Enrique G Molina; Nikolaos T Pyrsopoulos; Zheng-Zhou Feng; K Rajender Reddy; Eugene R Schiff
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods.

Authors:  Laurent Hermoye; Ismael Laamari-Azjal; Zhujiang Cao; Laurence Annet; Jan Lerut; Benoit M Dawant; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Multiparametric CT for Noninvasive Staging of Hepatitis C Virus-Related Liver Fibrosis: Correlation With the Histopathologic Fibrosis Score.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Adnan Said; Daniel Jones; Brandon Welsh; Ryan Zea; Meghan G Lubner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Grading and staging systems for inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Zachary D Goodman
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Morphometric changes in liver cirrhosis: aetiological differences correlated with progression.

Authors:  Kumi Ozaki; Osamu Matsui; Satoshi Kobayashi; Tetsuya Minami; Azusa Kitao; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.