| Literature DB >> 36204469 |
Longguang Tang1,2, Mingjian Ling3, Madiha Zahra Syeda4, Rui Sun5, Minghui He6, Qingchun Mu1, Xiulong Zhu1, Chunming Huang1, Liao Cui2.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Emerging therapies, such as ferroptosis mediated cancer therapy and phototherapy, offer new opportunities for HCC treatment. The combination of multiple treatments is often more effective than monotherapy, but many of the current treatments are prone to serious side effects, resulting in a serious decline in patients' quality of life. Therefore, the combination therapy of tumor in situ controllable activation will improve the efficacy and reduce side effects for precise treatment of tumor. Herein, we synthesized a GSH-activatable nanomedicine to synergize photothermal therapy (PTT) and ferrotherapy. We utilized a near-infrared dye SQ890 as both an iron-chelating and a photothermal converter agent, which was encapsulated with a GSH-sensitive polymer (PLGA-SS-mPEG), to attain the biocompatible SQ890@Fe nanoparticles (NPs). In the tumor microenvironment (TME), SQ890@Fe NPs showed a GSH-activated photothermal effect that could increase the Fenton reaction rate. Meanwhile, the depletion of GSH could further increase ferroptosis effect. In turn, the increasing radical generated by ferrotherapy could impair the formation of heat shock proteins (HSPs) which could amplify PTT effects by limiting the self-protection mechanism. Overall, the intelligent nanomedicine SQ890@Fe NPs combines ferrotherapy and PTT to enhance the efficacy and safety of cancer treatment through the mutual promotion of the two treatment mechanisms, providing a new dimension for tumor combination therapy.Entities:
Keywords: GSH; PTT; ferrotherapy; hepatocellular carcinoma; nanoparticle
Year: 2022 PMID: 36204469 PMCID: PMC9530464 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1022330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1(A) Schematic of the preparation of SQ890-Fe3+ complexes encapsulated with GSH-sensitive PLGA-SS-mPEG to attain SQ890@Fe NPs nanoparticles. (B) The in vivo behavior of SQ890@Fe NPs in a subcutaneous patient-derived tumor xenograft model of hepatocellular carcinoma (PDXHCC). (C) The mechanism of mutually-benefited combination of GSH-activated ferrotherapy and PTT for HCC.
FIGURE 2Characterization of SQ890@Fe NPs. (A) Under the action of GSH, the photothermal effect of SQ890-Fe was activated, and Fe3+ was reduced to Fe2+, which was released and lead to the occurrence of Fenton reaction and Ferroptosis. (B) The absorption spectra of SQ890 before and after treating with Fe3+ ions, and Fe3+ ions plus GSH. (C,D) Size distribution (C) and TEM images (D) of SQ890@Fe NPs. Scale bar: 500 nm. (E) Stability of SQ890@Fe NPs during 7 days. (F,G) Photothermal-heating curves (F) and infrared thermal images (H) of SQ890@Fe NPs at various concentrations with/without adding GSH (10 mM) under 808 nm laser illumination (1 W cm−2) for 5 min. (H) The photothermal-heating curves of SQ890@Fe NPs (40 μM) + GSH (10 mM) under different power laser irradiation. (I) Photothermic stability of SQ890@Fe NPs + GSH under 808 nm laser illumination for five cycles. (J,K) Heating and cooling curves of SQ890@Fe NPs + GSH (J) and linear relationship between cooling time and -ln (θ) (K). (L) The Fe ions released from SQ890@Fe NPs under the GSH (10 μM) condition.
FIGURE 3Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity to HepG2 cells. (A,B) Cellular internalization of nanoparticles labeled with Rho B observed by CSLM (A) and quantitative analysis by flow cytometry (B). Scale bar: 10 μm. (C) Viability of HepG2 cells after treated with different concentrations of SQ890@Fe NPs or SQ890 NPs in dark or under 808 nm laser illumination. (D) Live/dead stained by PI and calcein AM of HepG2 cells after various treatments. (E) The GSH in HepG2 cells after various treatments (***p < 0.001 versus PBS, n = 3/group).
FIGURE 4In Vivo antitumor effects. (A,B) IR thermographic pictures (A) and temperature changes of mice (B) administrated with PBS, SQ890@Fe NPs, and SQ890 NPs exposed to 808 nm laser (1 W cm−2). (C) Tumor volume growth curves of mice during the 10-days treatments (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 versus PBS, n = 5). (D) Photos of tumors after excision at the termination of treatment. (E,F) The tumor (E) and body (F) weights of mice in each group (***p < 0.001 versus PBS, n = 5). (G) H&E and TUNEL staining of tumors after 10-days treatment. Scale bar: 20 µm.