Literature DB >> 3620411

Long-term surveillance of mortality and cancer incidence in women receiving hormone replacement therapy.

K Hunt, M Vessey, K McPherson, M Coleman.   

Abstract

This paper reports the preliminary results of a cohort study of 4544 British women receiving hormone replacement therapy (HRT). These women were recruited at 21 specialist menopause clinics around Britain. Up to the end of June 1983, the mean duration of HRT use per woman was 67 months of which, on average, 43% was 'opposed' use. In general, however, both the amount of progestogen given and the number of days per cycle for which it was given was less than would have been the case if the women had been receiving modern opposed therapy. The major focus of the study was to monitor mortality and cancer incidence in the cohort. The mortality results were broadly reassuring: overall mortality was significantly lower than expected on the basis of national rates (relative risk 0.58) and mortality ratios were below unity for all specific causes of death examined apart from cancer of the ovary (relative risk 1.43, 95% confidence limits 0.62-2.82) and suicide or suspected suicide (relative risk 2.53, 95% confidence limits 1.26-4.54). The most likely explanation for the latter finding is selection bias--thus at least 7 of the 11 women who died from suicide or suspected suicide had a psychiatric history before receiving HRT. The cancer incidence results were less reassuring, although they should be interpreted with some caution because cancer registry rates were used for comparative purposes. With this proviso, endometrial cancer risk was significantly elevated (relative risk 2.84, 95% confidence limits 1.46-4.96); many of the women concerned had taken therapy which was predominantly or entirely opposed although only one woman had received an opposed regimen which would now be considered adequately protective to the endometrium. Breast cancer incidence was also significantly increased (relative risk 1.59, 95% confidence limits 1.18-2.10); detailed analysis suggested that the use of unopposed ethinyl-oestradiol in particular might have undesirable effects on the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3620411     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03166.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  44 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer hypothesis: a single cause for the majority of cases.

Authors:  R A Wiseman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  The menopause and hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  K T Khaw
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Long-term consequences of estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement.

Authors:  H O Adami
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Noncontraceptive hormone use and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  C P Yang; J R Daling; P R Band; R P Gallagher; E White; N S Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer, endometrial cancer and cardiovascular disease: risks and benefits.

Authors:  M K Goddard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Complications of hormone replacement therapy in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  J Studd
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Management of lipid disorders in the elderly.

Authors:  D A Playford; G F Watts
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Extraskeletal effects of estrogen and the prevention of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  T L Bush
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Osteoporosis after 60.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-06

10.  Hormone replacement therapy in general practice.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.