| Literature DB >> 36204062 |
Priyanka Trivedi1, Linards Klavins2, Anne Linn Hykkerud3, Jorens Kviesis2, Didzis Elferts4, Inger Martinussen3, Maris Klavins2, Katja Karppinen5, Hely Häggman1, Laura Jaakola3,5.
Abstract
Cuticle is the first layer protecting plants against external biotic and abiotic factors and is responsive to climatic factors as well as determined by genetic adaptations. In this study, the chemical composition of bilberry fruit cuticular wax was investigated through a latitudinal gradient from Latvia (56°N 24°E) through Finland (65°N 25°E) to northern Norway (69°N 18°E) in two seasons 2018 and 2019. Changes in the major cuticular wax compounds, including triterpenoids, fatty acids, alkanes, aldehydes, ketones, and primary alcohols, were detected by GC-MS analysis. Generally, a decreasing trend in the proportion of triterpenoids from southern to northern latitudes, accompanied with an increase in proportion of fatty acids, aldehydes, and alkanes, in bilberry fruit cuticular wax was observed. A correlation analysis between climatic factors with proportion of wax compounds indicated that temperature was the main factor affecting the cuticular wax composition in bilberries. A controlled phytotron experiment with southern and northern bilberry ecotypes confirmed the major effect of temperature on bilberry fruit cuticular wax load and composition. Elevated temperature increased wax load most in berries of northern ecotypes. The level of triterpenoids was higher, while levels of fatty acids and alkanes were lower, in wax of bilberry fruits ripened at 18°C compared to 12°C in both northern and southern ecotypes. Based on our results, it can be postulated that the predicted increase in temperature due to climate change leads to alterations in fruit cuticular wax load and composition. In northern ecotypes, the alterations were especially evident.Entities:
Keywords: berry; cuticular wax; fatty acids; latitudinal gradient; phytotron; temperature; triterpenoids
Year: 2022 PMID: 36204062 PMCID: PMC9530925 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.980427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Cuticular wax load and profile through latitudinal gradient. (A) Amount of cuticular wax (mg per berry) in bilberry fruits from Latvia (LA), Finland (FI), and Norway (NO) in years 2018 and 2019. The data is shown as mean ± SD of five replicates. (B) Cuticular wax profile in bilberry fruit through a latitudinal gradient from LA through FI and NO in 2018 and 2019. Error bars indicate Standard Error (n = 5).
Quantities (μg/mg of berry cuticular wax) of triterpenoids in ripe bilberry wax through a latitudinal gradient.
| Cuticular wax compounds | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
|
|
| |||||
| Latvia | Finland | Norway | Latvia | Finland | Norway | |
|
| ||||||
| Friedelin | 8.02 ± 5.24 | nd | 18.56 ± 12.23 | 8.38 ± 1.80 | 18.34 ± 10.27 | 16.37 ± 12.09 |
| Oleanolic acid | 372.13 ± 92.23 | 112.76 ± 67.32 | 11.86 ± 4.44 | 22.4 ± 11. 5 | 27.17 ± 8.61 | 4.13 ± 9.23 |
| Ursolic acid | 204.04 ± 69.21 | 47.73 ± 31.52 | 11.29 ± 7.43 | 8.87 ± 1.27 | 2.65 ± 5.93 | nd |
| β-Amyrin | 53.15 ± 18.06 | 168.03 ± 56.33 | 22.46 ± 9.30 | 16.67 ± 6.44 | 31.24 ± 14.65 | 33.22 ± 12.19 |
| α-Amyrin | 26.64 ± 15.71 | 40.33 ± 8.05 | 11.60 ± 4.38 | 11.39 ± 2.52 | 27.04 ± 11.54 | 27.37 ± 8.76 |
| Lupeol | 11.07 ± 7.22 | 45.17 ± 8.23 | 2.35 ± 5.25 | 9.97 ± 2.43 | 28.06 ± 12.97 | 24.63 ± 6.16 |
| Olean-2.12-dien-28-oic acid | nd | nd | nd | 9.35 ± 2.76 | 6.13 ± 6.47 | 17.20 ± 9.78 |
| Ursa-2.12-dien-28-oic acid | nd | nd | nd | 17.71 ± 8.38 | 5.46 ± 7.48 | 6.03 ± 13.49 |
| Methylenecycloartanol | nd | nd | nd | 10.18 ± 3.81 | nd | nd |
| γ-Taraxasterol | 4.44 ± 3.41 | 24.64 ± 4.50 | nd | 13.69 ± 6.82 | nd | nd |
| Bauerenol | nd | nd | nd | 16.25 ± 3.97 | nd | nd |
| Uvaol | 4.03 ± 1.64 | 9.79 ± 11.08 | 10.04 ± 5.27 | nd | nd | nd |
| Total | 683.52 | 439.92 | 88.15 | 144.92 | 146.10 | 128.95 |
Data is means ± SD of five replicates (sub-locations).
*Indicates statistically significant differences between locations means (P < 0.05).
Quantities (μg/mg of berry cuticular wax) of very long chain aliphatic compounds in ripe bilberry wax through a latitudinal gradient.
| Cuticular wax compounds | 2018 | 2019 | ||||
|
|
| |||||
| Latvia | Finland | Norway | Latvia | Finland | Norway | |
|
| ||||||
| Oleic acid | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 0.59 ± 0.21 | nd | nd | nd |
| Stearic acid | 1.02 ± 0.13 | 2.86 ± 0.47 | 1.88 ± 0.35 | 0.82 ± 0.31 | 1.69 ± 0.26 | 1.53 ± 0.76 |
| Nonadecanoic acid | nd | 1.11 ± 0.55 | 0.55 ± 0.33 | 0.45 ± 0.14 | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 1.38 ± 0.81 |
| Arachidic acid | 1.87 ± 0.67 | 41.48 ± 6.83 | 40.42 ± 8.17 | 12.89 ± 5.56 | 22.62 ± 5.30 | 22.15 ± 12.94 |
| Behenic acid | 1.48 ± 0.51 | 3.91 ± 0.37 | 4.09 ± 0.95 | 1.80 ± 0.79 | 5.04 ± 0.66 | 4.11 ± 1.45 |
| Lignoceric acid | 2.66 ± 0.71 | 6.13 ± 1.04 | 9.61 ± 1.97 | 5.52 ± 2.28 | 9.98 ± 1.13 | 11.06 ± 5.79 |
| Hyenic acid | 0.42 ± 0.15 | 2.19 ± 0.60 | 1.49 ± 0.49 | nd | 2.14 ± 0.39 | 2.69 ± 1.84 |
| Cerotic acid | 21.25 ± 3.62 | 60.54 ± 7.50 | 53.06 ± 10.91 | 46.30 ± 22.9 | 63.59 ± 3.17 | 55.46 ± 9.52 |
| Carboceric acid | 1.13 ± 0.36 | 4.73 ± 1.39 | 2.70 ± 0.52 | nd | nd | nd |
| Montanic acid | 38.60 ± 6.03 | 134.55 ± 13.32 | 57.65 ± 7.29 | 61.35 ± 35.94 | 83.35 ± 14.58 | 64.79 ± 11.88 |
| Nonacosanoic acid | 0.94 ± 0.35 | 2.24 ± 0.69 | 1.09 ± 0.16 | 1.11 ± 0.38 | 2.33 ± 0.47 | 3.03 ± 1.89 |
| Melissic acid | nd | 53.02 ± 12.80 | nd | nd | 27.72 ± 17.35 | 13.42 ± 3.52 |
| Total | 69.79 | 313.37 | 184.50 | 148.42 | 226.0 | 185.98 |
|
| ||||||
| 2-Nonanone | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| 2-Undecanone | nd | nd | 0.15 ± 0.05 | nd | nd | nd |
| 2-Tridecanone | 1.79 ± 0.22 | 1.50 ± 0.83 | 0.20 ± 0.15 | 1.37 ± 0.81 | 1.12 ± 0.64 | nd |
| 2-Nonadecanone | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.06 |
| 2-Heneicosanone | 3.49 ± 0.55 | 6.14 ± 1.80 | 10.47 ± 2.63 | 1.60 ± 1.30 | 2.87 ± 0.92 | 3.15 ± 1.58 |
| 2-Docosanone | nd | nd | 0.12 ± 0.07 | nd | nd | nd |
| Total | 5.34 | 7.96 | 11.30 | 3.07 | 3.72 | 1.74 |
|
| ||||||
| Octadecanal | nd | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | nd | nd | nd |
| Tetracosanal | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.16* | 0.44 ± 0.18 | 0.18 ± 0.09 | 0.03 ± 0.07 | nd |
| Pentacosanal | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.11 | 0.53 ± 0.34 | 0.26 ± 0.16 | 0.22 ± 0.19 | nd |
| Hexacosanal | 3.92 ± 1.40 | 4.05 ± 2.60 | 8.12 ± 2.71 | 2.39 ± 1.44 | 0.77 ± 0.32 | nd |
| Heptacosanal | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 1.21 ± 0.34 | 0.62 ± 0.15 | 0.45 ± 0.35 | 0.92 ± 0.63 | 0.41 ± 0.32 |
| Octacosanal | 9.10 ± 3.19 | 14.13 ± 7.07 | 9.54 ± 4.15 | 3.44 ± 2.12 | 1.33 ± 0.36 | 0.69 ± 0.38 |
| Triacontanal | 4.15 ± 1.71 | 4.27 ± 2.58 | 1.75 ± 1.44 | nd | 1.76 ± 1.54 | nd |
| Hentriacontanal | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.56 ± 0.92 | nd |
| Dotriacontanal | nd | nd | nd | nd | 0.74 ± 1.24 | nd |
| Total | 18.46 | 26.77 | 21.10 | 7.01 | 6.34 | 1.72 |
|
| ||||||
| Tetracosane | 0.30 ± 0.12 | 0.61 ± 0.23 | 0.46 ± 0.07 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.13 | 0.67 ± 0.23 |
| Pentacosane | 1.16 ± 0.23 | 3.02 ± 0.84 | 2.15 ± 0.61 | 0.96 ± 0.35 | 2.82 ± 1.60 | 2.44 ± 0.86 |
| Hexacosane | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.78 ± 0.19 | 0.51 ± 0.07 | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.83 ± 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.28 |
| Heptacosane | 2.13 ± 0.54 | 6.76 ± 1.80 | 3.79 ± 1.16 | 2.48 ± 0.95 | 6.12 ± 1.46 | 3.60 ± 0.23 |
| Octacosane | 0.26 ± 0.15 | nd | 0.41 ± 0.20 | 0.65 ± 0.56 | 1.24 ± 1.85 | 0.50 ± 0.18 |
| Nonacosane | 1.33 ± 0.58 | 3.77 ± 1.24 | nd | 1.25 ± 0.49 | 2.31 ± 1.20 | 1.79 ± 0.77 |
| Hentriacontane | 0.44 ± 0.26 | 1.53 ± 0.24 | nd | 1.12 ± 1.03 | nd | 1.00 ± 0.59 |
| Total | 5.99 | 15.56 | 3.70 | 6.89 | 13.91 | 10.74 |
Data is means ± SD of five replicates (sub-locations).
*Indicates statistically significant differences between locations means (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2RDA analysis presenting groups of compounds of berry wax and weather variables in different latitudinal locations in years (A) 2018, (B) 2019, and (C) combined data from 2018 and 2019.
FIGURE 3Correlation matrix showing relationship between wax compounds and climatic factors averaged through 8 weeks pre-harvest in (A) 2018 and (B) 2018 and 2019. X and Y axis in the correlation matrix can represent either the relative amount of each of the respective groups of compounds, °C in the case of temperature (Tavg, Tmax, Tmin) or mm for precipitation (Pavg).
FIGURE 4Effect of temperature on berry cuticular wax. (A) Amount of cuticular wax (mg per berry) in bilberry fruits after phytotron experiments at 12 and 18°C in southern and northern bilberry clones. The data is shown as mean ± SD of three replicates (n = 3). * Indicates the significant difference between the two temperature treatments (P < 0.05) by student t-test. (B) Cuticular wax profile in bilberries from phytotron experiments from southern and northern clones at 12 and 18°C. Error bars indicate Standard Error (n = 3).
Quantities (μg/mg of berry cuticular wax) of cuticular wax compounds in ripe bilberry wax in phytotron experiments.
| Cuticular wax compounds | Southern clones | Northern clones | ||
|
|
| |||
| 12°C | 18°C | 12°C | 18°C | |
|
| ||||
| Friedelin | 9.07 ± 7.91 | nd | 48.25 ± 4.78 | 150.63 ± 6.58 |
| Oleanolic acid | 11.38 ± 19.91 | 23.01 ± 0.63 | nd | nd |
| Ursolic acid | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| β-Amyrin | 17.13 ± 11.16 | 11.33 ± 0.49 | 91.48 ± 7.21 | 17.53 ± 0.87 |
| α-Amyrin | 14.00 ± 3.38 | 10.22 ± 0.38 | 19.22 ± 0.28 | 69.68 ± 0.41 |
| Lupeol | 16.26 ± 4.47 | 12.28 ± 0.42 | nd | nd |
| Olean-2.12-dien-28-oic acid | 12.29 ± 21.29 | 28.62 ± 0.77 | 28.95 ± 1.47 | 12.63 ± 2.18 |
| Ursa-2.12-dien-28-oic acid | nd | nd | 24.77 ± 1.69 | 19.40 ± 0.57 |
|
| ||||
| Eicosanoic acid | 82.21 ± 10.21 | 22.99 ± 2.37 | 108.20 ± 20.32 | 119.83 ± 8.61 |
| Lignoceric acid | 4.30 ± 0.32 | 31.39 ± 4.98 | 54.22 ± 1.19 | 36.10 ± 1.07 |
| Cerotic acid | 56.92 ± 1.14 | 126.48 ± 33.07 | 209.93 ± 15.29 | 117.37 ± 5.18 |
| Montanic acid | 91.23 ± 3.19 | 131.04 ± 15.38 | 107.86 ± 3.36 | 110.82 ± 1.18 |
|
| ||||
| Pentacosane | 4.03 ± 0.55 | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 2.83 ± 2.80 | 5.64 ± 0.37 |
| Hexacosane | 0.82 ± 0.74 | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 1.52 ± 1.01 | 1.20 ± 0.11 |
| Heptacosane | 8.83 ± 0.92 | 1.92 ± 0.24 | 11.38 ± 0.99 | 10.23 ± 1.43 |
|
| ||||
| Pentacosanal | 0.81 ± 0.98 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | nd | nd |
| Hexacosanal | 2.32 ± 1.55 | 9.98 ± 3.15 | 1.71 ± 0.68 | 0.73 ± 0.15 |
| Heptacosanal | 6.34 ± 8.58 | 0.97 ± 0.35 | 1.20 ± 0.27 | 1.38 ± 0.08 |
| Octacosanal | 11.38 ± 9.55 | 15.63 ± 4.70 | 3.92 ± 0.73 | 2.46 ± 0.18 |
| Nonacosanal | nd | 9.77 ± 16.05 | 1.31 ± 0.30 | 2.86 ± 0.21 |
| Triacontanal | 6.46 ± 5.75 | 0.96 ± 0.33 | nd | 3.05 ± 0.08 |
| Hentriacontanal | 0.33 ± 0.30 | nd | nd | nd |
Data is means ± SD of three replicates.
*Indicates statistically significant differences between means at 12 and 18°C (P < 0.05).