| Literature DB >> 36203719 |
Abstract
In this new era that is full of social changes, ongoing economic transformation, an abundance of information resources, and a fast pace of life, the pressure that people feel to compete with one another is also increasing day by day. Because of the vast differences in people's states of consciousness and worldviews, interpersonal relationships have become increasingly difficult to navigate. Students in higher education institutions will eventually emerge as the dominant demographic in society. Their mental health has a significant bearing on all aspects of life, including learning and future growth. An objective condition that must be met in order to guarantee that the next generation of talent will have a high level of overall quality is the improvement of the mental health of college students (CSMH) in the new era. One component of public health is the emotional well-being of students in higher education. The state of the public's health is consistently ranked among the most urgent problems facing modern society. However, there is not much hope for the Chinese CSMH. In order to effectively manage their mental health, a variety of educational institutions, including colleges and universities, have proposed a large number of management strategies for CSMH. The vast majority of these strategies are not targeted, and they do not offer a variety of management strategies that are based on the many different psychological states. It is necessary to first be able to accurately predict the mental health status of each individual college student in order to achieve the goal of improving the mental health management of students attending colleges and universities. This study proposes using a multi-view K-means algorithm, abbreviated as MvK-means, to analyze the CSMH's data on mental health. This is possible because the data can be obtained from multiple perspectives. This paper presents a multi-view strategy as well as a weight strategy in light of the fact that each point of view contributes in its own unique way. Different weight values should be assigned to each view's data, which will ultimately result in an improved evaluation effect of the model. The findings of the experiments indicate that the model that was proposed has a beneficial impact on the analysis of the data pertaining to the mental health of college students.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36203719 PMCID: PMC9532062 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2813473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1The CSMH management principle diagram.
Figure 2Architecture of CSMH management system.
Figure 3K-means algorithm flow chart.
Figure 4Multi-view learning model.
Algorithm 1The algorithm flow is as follows.
Basic information of students.
| Gender | Grade | Character | Household income | From rural/urban | Is it an only child? | GPA | Attendance in class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Freshman | Outgoing | Middle | Urban | Yes | Excellent | Good |
| Female | Junior year | Introverted | Low | Rural | No | Good | Excellent |
Conversion table.
| Attributes | Value | Code |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 11 |
| Female | 12 | |
|
| ||
| Grade | Freshman | 21 |
| Sophomore | 22 | |
| Junior year | 23 | |
| Senior year | 24 | |
|
| ||
| Character | Introverted | 31 |
| Outgoing | 32 | |
| Inside and outside | 33 | |
|
| ||
| Household income | Low | 41 |
| Middle | 42 | |
| High | 43 | |
|
| ||
| From rural/urban | Rural | 51 |
| City | 52 | |
|
| ||
| Is it an only child? | Yes | 61 |
| No | 62 | |
|
| ||
| GPA | Failed | 71 |
| Pass | 72 | |
| Medium | 73 | |
| Good | 74 | |
| Excellent | 75 | |
|
| ||
| Attendance in class | Failed | 81 |
| Pass | 82 | |
| Medium | 83 | |
| Good | 84 | |
| Excellent | 85 | |
Questionnaire.
| No. | Question | Options |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gender | A. male B. female |
| 2 | Grade | A. freshman B. sophomore C. junior D. senior |
| 3 | Do you feel stressed? | A. very large B. large C. average D. no pressure |
| 4 | Source of stress | A. study B. love C. interpersonal communication D. high self-demanding |
| 5 | How to deal with mental problems | A. talk with friends B. talk with parents C. solve it by yourself D. let it go. E other |
| 6 | Whether to attend a mental health education seminar or class? | A. never participated B. listened occasionally C. often participated |
| 7 | How to reduce stress? | A. sleeping B. listening to music C. exercising D. talking. E other |
| 8 | Can mental health be managed? | A. can B. cannot |
Evaluation results obtained by each model.
| Index/model | K-means | FCM | Reference [ | Proposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMI | 0.8041 | 0.8096 | 0.8351 | 0.8437 |
| RI | 0.7879 | 0.7923 | 0.8125 | 0.8290 |
Figure 5Comparison of experimental results.