| Literature DB >> 36203678 |
Meng Liu1, Chuntian Lu1.
Abstract
Background: With the continuous updating of mobile phone functions, the phenomenon of mobile phone addiction among University students is becoming more and more serious. It is important to identify the potential risk factors for mobile phone addiction. The aim of the study was to examine whether there is a relationship between mobile phone addiction and depression symptoms in University students, and to investigate whether sleep disturbances play a mediating role between mobile phone addiction and depression symptoms, as well as the moderating role of gender.Entities:
Keywords: University student; depressive symptoms; gender; mobile phone addiction; sleep disturbances
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36203678 PMCID: PMC9531624 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.965135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Participant characteristics for the entire sample and by gender (n = 973).
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age | 973 (100.0) | 19 (1.04) | 17-25 | 478 (100.0) | 19.15 (1.70) | 495 (100.0) | 19.47 (1.92) | 0.003 |
| Residence | 970 (99.7) | 476 (99.6) | 1.44 (0.50) | 494(99.8) | 1.44 (0.50) | 0.995 | ||
| Rural | 544 (55.9) | 267 (55.9) | 277(56.0) | |||||
| Urban | 426 (43.8) | 209 (43.7) | 217 (43.9) | |||||
| Self-rated health | 973 (100.0) | 2.36 (0.81) | 478 (100.0) | 2.31 (0.87) | 495 (100.0) | 2.41(0.75) | 0.59 | |
| In excellent health (1) | 133 (13.7) | 85 (17.8) | 48 (9.7) | |||||
| In good health (2) | 431 (44.3) | 201(42.1) | 230 (46.4) | |||||
| General health condition (3) | 341 (35.0) | 156 (32.6) | 185 (37.3) | |||||
| In poor health (4) | 64 (6.6) | 32 (6.7) | 32 (6.5) | |||||
| In very poor health (5) | 4 (0.4) | 4 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | |||||
| MPAI | 930 (95.6) | 36.03 (12.66) | 17–80 | 455 (95.2) | 34.06 (12.04) | 475 (96.0) | 37.91 (12.96) | <0.001 |
| PHQ9 | 960 (98.7) | 4.34 (4.15) | 0–27 | 473(99.0) | 4.00 (4.39) | 487 (98.4) | 4.67(3.88) | 0.13 |
| PSQI | 921 (94.7) | 5.46 (2.71) | 0–17 | 450 (94.1) | 5.12 (2.70) | 471 (95.2) | 5.79(2.68) | <0.001 |
| Subjective sleep quality | 966 (99.3) | 0.95 (0.67) | 0–3 | 473 (99.0) | 0.93 (0.69) | 493 (99.6) | 0.98 (0.66) | 0.27 |
| Sleep latency | 958 (98.5) | 0.97 (0.81) | 0–3 | 470 (98.3) | 0.91 (0.80) | 488 (98.6) | 1.03 (0.81) | 0.24 |
| Sleep duration | 965 (99.2) | 1.10 (0.73) | 0–3 | 474 (99.2) | 1.10 (0.72) | 491(99.2) | 1.10 (0.73) | 0.99 |
| Habitual sleep efficiency | 962 (98.9) | 0.19 (0.52) | 0–3 | 471 (98.5) | 0.20 (0.53) | 491 (99.2) | 0.19 (0.51) | 0.67 |
| Sleep disturbance | 941 (96.7) | 0.86 (0.54) | 0–3 | 462 (96.7) | 0.78 (0.54) | 479 (96.8) | 0.93 (0.53) | <0.001 |
| Use of sleep medication | 968 (99.5) | 0.06 (0.38) | 0–3 | 476 (99.6) | 0.05 (0.35) | 492 (99.4) | 0.08 (0.40) | 0.20 |
| Daytime dysfunction | 968 (99.5) | 1.35 (1.00) | 0-3 | 475 (99.4) | 1.16 (1.00) | 493 (99.6) | 1.53 (0.97) | <0.001 |
Analysis between male vs. female was performed with t-tests for continuous variables (normal distribution) and χ2 test for categorical variables.
SD, Standard Deviation; MPAI, Mobile Phone Addiction Index; PHQ9, Patient Health Questionnaire- 9; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Pearson's correlations among relevant study variables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Age | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 2. Gender | 0.10 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 3. Residence | 0.00 | −0.02 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 4. Self-rated health | 0.06 | −0.09 | 0.03 | 1 | ||||||||||
| 5. MPAI | 0.16 | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 1 | |||||||||
| 6. PHQ9 | 0.08 | 0.05 | −0.02 | 0.28 | 0.45 | 1 | ||||||||
| 7. PSQI | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 1 | |||||||
| 8. Subjective sleep quality | 0.04 | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.69 | 1 | ||||||
| 9. Sleep latency | 0.08 | 0.07 | −0.02 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.68 | 0.46 | 1 | |||||
| 10. Sleep duration | 0.00 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.017 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 1 | ||||
| 11. Habitual sleep efficiency | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.27 | 1 | |||
| 12. Sleep disturbance | 0.14 | 0.04 | −0.05 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.40 | 0.58 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 1 | ||
| 13. Use of sleep medication | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.128 | −0.02 | 0.16 | 0.2818 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1 | |
| 14. Daytime dysfunction | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 0.11 | 1 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
MPAI, mobile phone addiction index; PHQ9, patient health questionnaire-9; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Testing the mediation model of sleep disturbances.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Constant | −2.31 | 1.6 | −5.46 | 0.84 | −6.86 | 2.06 | −10.89 | −2.82 |
| MPAI | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| PSQI | − | − | − | − | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.556 | 0.73 |
| Age | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.169 | 0.1 | −0.03 | 0.37 |
| Residence | −0.06 | 0.17 | −0.39 | 0.27 | −0.39 | 0.22 | −0.81 | 0.03 |
| Self-rated health | 0.77 | 0.11 | 0.57 | 0.98 | 0.75 | 0.14 | 0.48 | 1.02 |
| F = 48.41 | F = 122.25 | |||||||
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
Variables have been normalized. 95% CI estimated using bootstrap method. Bootstrap sample size = 5,000.
CI, confidence interval; β, standardized regression coefficient; S.E., standard error; LLCI, lower level confidence interval; ULCI, upper level confidence interval; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index; PHQ9, patient health questionnaire-9; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Figure 1(Hypothesis 1) Total effect models: effect of mobile phone addiction on depression symptoms ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2(Hypothesis 2) Mediation models: effect of mobile phone addition on depression symptoms with the mediation of sleep disturbances ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Mediating role of seven components of sleep disturbances on the relationship between mobile phone addiction and depression symptom *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4(Hypothesis 3) Moderated-mediation model: effect of mobile phone addiction on depression symptoms with sleep disturbances as a mediator and gender as a moderator.
Testing the moderated mediation effect of mobile phone addiction on depression symptoms.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Constant | −0.036 | 1.59 | −3.16 | 3.08 | −3.62 | 2.04 | −7.61 | 0.38 |
| MPAI | 0.090 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| PSQI | – | – | – | – | 0.64 | 0.04 | 0.56 | 0.73 |
| Gender | 0.342 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.678 | – | – | – | – |
| MPAI × Gender | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.01 | – | – | – | – |
| Age | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.10 | −0.03 | 0.37 |
| Residence | −0.05 | 0.17 | −0.38 | 0.28 | −0.39 | 0.22 | −0.81 | 0.03 |
| Self-rated health | 0.76 | 0.11 | 0.55 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.14 | 0.48 | 1.02 |
| F = 33.27 | F = 122.25 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| β |
|
| ||||||
| 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.11 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| β |
|
| ||||||
| M – 1 SD | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.06 | ||||
| M | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.01 | ||||
| M + 1 SD | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||||
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
Variables have been normalized. 95% CI estimated using bootstrap method. Bootstrap sample size = 5,000.
CI, confidence interval; β, standardized regression coefficient; S.E., standard error; LLCI, lower level confidence interval; ULCI, upper level confidence interval; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index; PHQ9, patient health questionnaire-9; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.