Helena M A Feenstra1, Elon H C van Dijk1, Thomas J van Rijssen1, Roula Tsonaka2, Roselie M H Diederen3, Carel B Hoyng4, Reinier O Schlingemann3,5, Camiel J F Boon6,7. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. camiel.boon@amsterdamumc.nl. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. camiel.boon@amsterdamumc.nl.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Comparing anatomic and functional efficacy and safety of primary treatment with either half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) or oral eplerenone, or crossover treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients. METHODS: After the SPECTRA trial baseline visit, patients were randomized to either half-dose PDT or eplerenone and received crossover treatment if persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) was present at first follow-up (at 3 months). Presence of SRF and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated at 12 months. RESULTS: Out of the 90 patients evaluated at 12 months, complete SRF resolution was present on OCT in 43/48 (89.6%) of patients who were primarily randomized to half-dose PDT and in 37/42 (88.1%) who were primarily randomized to eplerenone. Out of the 42 patients that were primarily randomized to eplerenone, 35 received crossover treatment with half-dose PDT. The BCVA improved significantly more at 12 months in patients who had received primary half-dose PDT as compared to the primary eplerenone group (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after baseline visit, most patients treated with half-dose PDT (either primary or crossover treatment) still had complete SRF resolution. The long-term BCVA in patients who receive primary half-dose PDT is better than in patients in whom PDT is delayed due to initial eplerenone treatment with persistent SRF.
PURPOSE: Comparing anatomic and functional efficacy and safety of primary treatment with either half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) or oral eplerenone, or crossover treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients. METHODS: After the SPECTRA trial baseline visit, patients were randomized to either half-dose PDT or eplerenone and received crossover treatment if persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) was present at first follow-up (at 3 months). Presence of SRF and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated at 12 months. RESULTS: Out of the 90 patients evaluated at 12 months, complete SRF resolution was present on OCT in 43/48 (89.6%) of patients who were primarily randomized to half-dose PDT and in 37/42 (88.1%) who were primarily randomized to eplerenone. Out of the 42 patients that were primarily randomized to eplerenone, 35 received crossover treatment with half-dose PDT. The BCVA improved significantly more at 12 months in patients who had received primary half-dose PDT as compared to the primary eplerenone group (p = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve months after baseline visit, most patients treated with half-dose PDT (either primary or crossover treatment) still had complete SRF resolution. The long-term BCVA in patients who receive primary half-dose PDT is better than in patients in whom PDT is delayed due to initial eplerenone treatment with persistent SRF.
Authors: Danial Mohabati; Rosa L Schellevis; Elon H C van Dijk; Lebriz Altay; Sascha Fauser; Carel B Hoyng; Eiko K De Jong; Camiel J F Boon; Suzanne Yzer Journal: Retina Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Elon H C van Dijk; Rosa L Schellevis; Myrte B Breukink; Danial Mohabati; Greet Dijkman; Jan E E Keunen; Suzanne Yzer; Anneke I den Hollander; Carel B Hoyng; Eiko K de Jong; Camiel J F Boon Journal: Retina Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Thomas J van Rijssen; Elon H C van Dijk; Suzanne Yzer; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Jan E E Keunen; Reinier O Schlingemann; Sobha Sivaprasad; Giuseppe Querques; Susan M Downes; Sascha Fauser; Carel B Hoyng; Felice Cardillo Piccolino; Jay K Chhablani; Timothy Y Y Lai; Andrew J Lotery; Michael Larsen; Frank G Holz; K Bailey Freund; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Camiel J F Boon Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Myrte B Breukink; Rosa L Schellevis; Camiel J F Boon; Sascha Fauser; Carel B Hoyng; Anneke I den Hollander; Eiko K de Jong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rosa L Schellevis; Lebriz Altay; Asha Kalisingh; Timo W F Mulders; Vasilena Sitnilska; Carel B Hoyng; Camiel J F Boon; Joannes M M Groenewoud; Eiko K de Jong; Anneke I den Hollander Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Danial Mohabati; Rosa L Schellevis; Elon H C van Dijk; Sascha Fauser; Anneke I den Hollander; Carel B Hoyng; Eiko K De Jong; Suzanne Yzer; Camiel J F Boon Journal: Retina Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 3.975