| Literature DB >> 36202839 |
Perumal Vivekanandhan1,2, Kannan Swathy3, Lucy Alford4, Sarayut Pittarate3, Subramanian Panchu Ravindra Rajan Subala5, Supamit Mekchay6,7, Dilipan Elangovan8, Patcharin Krutmuang9,10.
Abstract
Insect pests of agricultural crops have establish immunological tolerance against fungal infection caused by pathogens via different humoral and cellular processes. Fungal infection can be prevented by insect antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes, but there is no clear understanding of how they physiologically and biochemically interact. Our study aims to examine the antioxidant and detoxifying enzyme defense systems of the pest insect Spodoptera litura in response to infection by Metarhizium flavoviride. At 48 h following exposure to M. flavoviride, antioxidant enzyme levels were modified, and phenoloxidase and total hemocyte count were decreased significantly. The amount of detoxifying enzymes increased significantly. M. flavoviride appears to directly affect the S. litura immune system and results in decreased immunity. In a bioassay, M. flavoviride was found to be harmful to S. litura larvae in their third and fourth instar stage. M. flavoviride may be an effective tool in the control of S. litura larvae. Such entomopathogenic fungi represent cheaper, pollution free, target specific, promising alternatives to synthetic chemical tools in the for control insect pests.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36202839 PMCID: PMC9537412 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20426-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Larvicidal activities of S. litura after insect pathogenic fungi spore’s treatment with M. flavoviride against S. litura larvae. Tukey test (one way ANOVA) indicates that statistical values following the same letter are not significantly different.
Figure 2Insect larval haemocyte count after M. flavoviride fungi spores’ treatment against S. litura. An analysis of variance and multiple comparison test was performed with the data expressed as mean (± S.D) (significantly p < 0.05). Compared with control group by ANNOVA. (**** indicates p < 0.0001; *** = p < 0.001; ** = p < 0.01; ** = p < 0.05; ns-no significant).
Figure 3Phenoloxidase activity (A), CAT assay (B), SOD activity (C) and POX activity (D) after the treatment with M. flavoviride fungi spores against S. litura. An analysis of variance and multiple comparison test was performed with the data expressed as mean (± S.D) (significantly p* 0.05). Compared with control group by ANNOVA. (*** indicates p < 0.001; ** = p < 0.01; * = p < 0.05; ns-no significant).
Figure 4LPO activity in treatment with M. flavoviride against S. litura. An analysis of variance and multiple comparison test was performed with the data expressed as mean (± S.D) (significantly p* 0.05). Compared with control group by ANNOVA. (*** indicates p < 0.001; ** = p < 0.01; * = p < 0.05; ns-no significant).
Figure 5ACP (A) and ALP (B) activity in treatment with M. flavoviride fungi spores against S. litura. An analysis of variance and multiple comparison test was performed with the data expressed as mean (± S.D) (significantly p* 0.05). Compared with control group by ANNOVA. (*** indicates p < 0.001; ** = p < 0.01; * = p < 0.05; ns-no significant).