| Literature DB >> 36200064 |
Karine Lino Rodrigues1, Vivian Vieira Dias Da Silva1, Evelyn Nunes Goulart da Silva Pereira1, Raquel Rangel Silvares1, Beatriz Peres de Araujo1, Edgar Eduardo Ilaquita Flores1, Isalira Peroba Ramos2, Juliana Pereira Borges3, Caroline Fernandes-Santos1,4, Anissa Daliry1.
Abstract
Purpose: Type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients have liver and adipose tissue microcirculation disturbances associated with metabolic dysfunction and disease progression. However, the potential role of aerobic training on hepatic and white adipose tissue (WAT) microcirculation and the underlying mechanisms have not been elucidated to date. Therefore, we investigated the role of aerobic training on liver and WAT microcirculation and AGE-RAGE modulation in T2D mice.Entities:
Keywords: AGE-RAGE; hyperglycemia; microcirculation; physical training
Year: 2022 PMID: 36200064 PMCID: PMC9527816 DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S365496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes ISSN: 1178-7007 Impact factor: 3.249
Figure 1Effect of physical exercise on hemodynamic and metabolic parameters in type 2 diabetes (T2D) mice. Study design (A) C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into 4 groups: sedentary control group (CTL), which received a grain-based diet throughout the experiment; the sedentary type 2 diabetic group, which had access to a high-carbohydrate, high-fat diet throughout the experiment (T2D); the physical exercise control group, which received normal chow and underwent a physical exercise protocol (30 min session, 3 times per week, 12 weeks)(CTL EX); and the physical exercise type 2 diabetic group, which had access to a high-carbohydrate, high-fat diet and underwent the same physical exercise protocol (T2D EX). At the end of the 36-week protocol, mice underwent in vivo analysis, including systolic blood pressure analysis, liver ultrasonography, as well as liver and adipose tissue microcirculation assessments by in vivo microscopy and laser speckle contrast imaging. The following parameters are shown: body weight during experimental protocol (B), serum glucose levels during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (C) and AUC (D) of the CTL, CTL EX, T2D, and T2D EX groups. *P < 0.05 T2D vs CTL; **P < 0.01 T2D vs CTL; ***P < 0.001 T2D vs CTL; #P < 0.05 T2D vs T2D EX; ##P < 0.01 T2D vs T2D EX. Figure 1A created with BioRender.com.
Effect of Physical Training on Metabolic Parameters in T2D Mice
| Parameters | CTL | CTL EX | T2D | T2D EX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue weight | ||||
| Liver, g/cm | 0.06 ± 0.001 | 0.05 ± 0.004 | 0.08 ± 0.004* | 0.07 ± 0.004 |
| Subcutaneous WAT, g | 0.50 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 4.24 ± 0.19*** | 3.81 ± 0.25*** |
| Visceral WAT, g | 1.38 ± 0.11 | 1.18 ± 0.12 | 5.05 ± 0.25*** | 4.76 ± 0.20*** |
| Glucose metabolism | ||||
| Blood glucose, mmol/L | 5.41 ± 0.53 | 5.99 ± 0.97 | 8.09 ± 0.56* | 7.94 ± 0.42 |
| Insulin, μU/mL | 0.9 ± 0.01 | 0.8 ± 0.004 | 1.0 ± 0.01*** | 1.0 ± 0.01*** |
| HOMA-IR | 0.3 ± 0.009 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.02** | 0.4 ± 0.02 |
| Lipid metabolism | ||||
| TC, mg/dL | 109.90 ± 12.12 | 122.83 ± 9.28 | 201.60 ± 11.17*** | 175.44 ± 10.84** |
| LDLc, mg/dL | 3.38 ± 0.69 | 2.97 ± 0.29 | 10.42 ± 0.58*** | 10.75 ± 0.80*** |
| HDLc, mg/dL | 24.46 ± 0.95 | 24.03 ± 2.22 | 16.20 ± 1.63* | 19.65 ± 1.51 |
| Hepatic metabolism | ||||
| AST (U/L) | 13.40 ± 1.09 | 15.60 ± 1.69 | 20.76 ± 1.92 | 17.60 ± 1.87 |
| ALT (U/L) | 6.73 ± 1.15 | 7.38 ± 1.31 | 13.85 ± 1.35** | 12.20 ± 1.25* |
| Liver CT, mg/dL | 9.76 ± 1.20 | 6.45 ± 1.87 | 32.41 ± 2.57*** | 26.5 ± 2.51*** |
| Liver TG, mg/dL | 26.24 ± 3.75 | 22.98 ± 2.91 | 46.55 ± 2.97*** | 46.44 ± 1.58*** |
Notes: Data as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis: *P < 0.03 vs CTL. **P < 0.002 vs CTL. ***P < 0.001 vs CTL. Groups: CTL, control diet without physical exercise. CTL EX, control diet and physical exercise. T2D, diet-induced type 2 diabetes without physical exercise. T2D EX, diet-induced T2D and physical exercise. Diabetogenic diet: high-carbohydrate, high-fat diet plus 25% fructose in the drinking water ad libitum.
Abbreviations: HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WAT, white adipose tissue; TC, total cholesterol; LDLc, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDLc, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
Effect of Physical Training on Cardiac Parameters in T2D Mice
| Parameters | CTL | CTL EX | T2D | T2D EX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart weight, g/cm | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 0.01 ± 0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg | 135.0 ± 0.92 | 126.0 ± 0.83 | 155.4 ± 2.80*** | 141.1 ± 1.05### |
| Ejection Fraction (%) | 56.52 ± 3.12 | 65.12 ± 1.76 | 41.06 ± 3.01** | 43.04 ± 1.84 |
| Fractional Area Change (%) | 44.62 ± 4.26 | 54.27 ± 4.09 | 35.60 ± 3.32 | 33.20 ± 5.40 |
| Stroke Volume (uL) | 43.81 ± 2.74 | 41.80 ± 1.98 | 29.99 ± 2.44** | 28.02 ± 2.26 |
| Diastolic volume (uL) | 77.82 ± 4.40 | 64.21 ± 2.85 | 73.14 ± 3.73 | 64.93 ± 4.02 |
| Systolic volume (uL) | 34.01 ± 3.51 | 22.41 ± 1.64 | 43.14 ± 3.35 | 36.92 ± 2.39 |
Notes: Data as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis: **P < 0.002 vs CTL. ***P < 0.001 vs CTL. ###P < 0.001 vs T2D. Groups: CTL, control diet without physical exercise. CTL EX, control diet and physical exercise. T2D, diet-induced type 2 diabetes without physical exercise. T2D EX, diet-induced T2D and physical exercise. Diabetogenic diet: high-carbohydrate, high-fat diet plus 25% fructose in the drinking water ad libitum.
Figure 2Effect of physical exercise on liver steatosis and fibrosis in type 2 diabetes (T2D) mice. Representative images of liver samples stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson’s trichrome (A) quantitative assessment of liver steatosis (B) and fibrosis (C); ultrasound analysis of the liver (D) in the sedentary/exercised control mice (CTL/CTL EX) and in the sedentary/exercised type 2 diabetic mice (T2D/T2D EX). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Effect of physical exercise on the microcirculatory changes in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Quantification of leukocyte bearing and adhesion in the microcirculation of the liver (A and B) and adipose tissue (C and D). Representative images of hepatic and fat tissue microvascular blood flow evaluated by laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) and the setting of the region of interest (ROI, white circle) (E and F). Liver and adipose tissue microcirculatory basal blood flow by LSCI expressed as arbitrary perfusion units- APU (E and H). Representative images and quantification of vitamin A-positive cells (I and J), and the percentage of α-SMA expression in the hepatic tissue (K and L) of sedentary/exercised control (CTL/CTL EX) and sedentary/exercised type 2 diabetic mice (T2D/T2D EX) groups. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Effect of physical exercise on oxidative damage and the AGE-RAGE pathway in T2D mice. Quantification of thiobarbituric acid reactive species, malondialdehyde levels (MDA), the enzymatic activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), and the enzymatic activity of catalase (CAT) in the liver (A–C) and adipose tissue (D–F). Quantification of fluorescent AGE levels in the serum, liver and adipose tissue (G–I). Levels hepatic nitric oxide (NO) by quantification of nitrite (J), and protein expression of RAGE in the liver and adipose tissue (K and L) of sedentary/exercised control (CTL/CTL EX), sedentary/exercised type 2 diabetic mice (T2D/T2D EX) groups. Pearson´s correlation analyses between hepatic AGEs and protein expression of RAGE, hepatic fibrosis, hepatic steatosis, α-SMA expression in the liver, vitamin A-positive cells and hepatic microcirculatory parameters (M–U). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.