| Literature DB >> 36199344 |
Nolwenn Paugam1, Yves Pouliot1, Gabriel Remondetto2, Thierry Maris3, Guillaume Brisson1.
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize and compare the mechanisms of calcium phosphate precipitation in skimmed milk ultrafiltration permeate (MP) and MP preconcentrated by reverse osmosis (ROMP). The effects of different physicochemical parameters such as the pH (8.0), the heating time (60 or 120 min at 60 °C) and the seeding of samples with dicalcium phosphate (DCP) were tested. The concentration of salts (K, Ca, Na, Mg, and P) in the freeze-dried precipitates was measured using inductively coupled plasma (ICP). The amount of remaining ionic calcium was also monitored. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis were used to characterize the type of calcium phosphate precipitates that formed. The morphological structure of particles was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The chemical analyses showed that RO increased the rate of precipitated ions, especially Ca and P in MP, while alkalinization to pH 8.0 and heating at 60 °C significantly increased the precipitation of salts, with the calcium phosphate structure changing into complex forms such as hydroxyapatite (HAP) and whitlockite. MP preconcentration by RO paves the way for improving the precipitation yield of milk salts in the form of HAP for Ca fortification in various foods. It offers an original way to valorize the milk salts contained in the high volumes of MP generated by the cheese industry. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36199344 PMCID: PMC9443675 DOI: 10.1039/d2ra02852b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Composition and pH values of MP and ROMPa
| Composition | MP | ROMP |
|---|---|---|
| Total solids% (w/v) | 5.89 ± 0.08 | 14.84 ± 0.21 |
| Lactose (g/100 g) | 4.92 ± 0.03 | 12.34 ± 0.17 |
| Elements (mg/100 g) | ||
| Ca | 32.03 ± 1.29 | 85.33 ± 1.03 |
| Na | 33.01 ± 0.33 | 85.54 ± 1.20 |
| P | 40.32 ± 1.34 | 106.07 ± 1.74 |
| K | 156.8 ± 6.41 | 406.49 ± 8.24 |
| Mg | 6.94 ± 0.21 | 18.46 ± 0.15 |
| pH values | 6.77 ± 0.06 | 6.69 ± 0.03 |
Average value for 3 separate lots (± standard deviation).
Fig. 1Experimental design of calcium phosphate precipitation.
Fig. 2Percentage of salts precipitated in MP (a) and ROMP (b) by treatment (dicalcium phosphate [DCP] seeding, pH 8.0, heat treatment). Values with a different letter on the same graph were significantly different (P < 0.05).
Variations in percentages of Ca, K, Mg, Na and P precipitated in MP and ROMP according to different physicochemical treatments
| Product | Treatments | Percentage of ions precipitated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | K | Mg | Na | P | ||
| MP | No treatment | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a |
| DCP | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.0 ± 0.0a | |
| DCP pH 8 | 20.96 ± 3.87b | 0.14 ± 0.11a | 4.22 ± 0.95ab | 0.27 ± 0.08ab | 11.15 ± 2.32b | |
| DCP pH 8 60 °C 60 min | 45.54 ± 3.06c | 0.44 ± 0.35a | 4.84 ± 0.67ab | 0.87 ± 0.16ab | 23.47 ± 2.42c | |
| DCP pH 8 60 °C 120 min | 46.26 ± 7.76c | 0.40 ± 0.33a | 4.33 ± 0.94ab | 0.73 ± 0.18ab | 24.95 ± 5.89c | |
| ROMP | No treatment | 3.34 ± 1.52a | 0.27 ± 0.24a | 0.84 ± 0.32a | 0.15 ± 0.15a | 1.64 ± 0.65ab |
| DCP | 2.89 ± 2.19a | 0.08 ± 0.17a | 0.41 ± 0.38a | 0.09 ± 0.10a | 1.67 ± 1.21ab | |
| DCP pH 8 | 31.71 ± 12.65bc | 0.53 ± 0.61a | 7.99 ± 7.24b | 1.03 ± 0.89b | 12.91 ± 11.14b | |
| DCP pH 8 60 °C 60 min | 67.81 ± 9.44d | 1.80 ± 1.63b | 11.78 ± 2.01bc | 3.72 ± 0.32c | 35.67 ± 5.31cd | |
| DCP pH 8 60 °C 120 min | 71.83 ± 10.58d | 2.19 ± 1.98b | 13.61 ± 2.09bc | 4.52 ± 0.74c | 38.27 ± 5.87d | |
Average value for 3 separate lots (± standard deviation).
Values with a different letter in the same column were significantly different (P < 0.05).
Values for Ca and P were corrected for the added DCP.
Fig. 3Evolution of free ionic Ca2+ precipitation in supernatant depending on treatments for MP (a) and ROMP (b). Values with a different letter on the same graph were significantly different (P < 0.05).
Variations in Ca/P molar ratios precipitated in MP and ROMP according to different physicochemical treatments
| Treatments | Molar ratio Ca/P | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MP | ROMP | ||
| Products | No treatment | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 1.25 ± 0.13a |
| DCP | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 1.05 ± 0.08a | |
| DCP pH 8 | 1.16 ± 0.05b | 1.27 ± 0.11a | |
| DCP pH 8 60 °C 60 min | 1.19 ± 0.07b | 1.18 ± 0.01a | |
| DCP pH 8 60 °C 120 min | 1.15 ± 0.10b | 1.17 ± 0.01a | |
Average value for 3 separate lots (± standard deviation).
Values with a different letter in the same column were significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4XRD spectral patterns showing the main phase composition and structure of the precipitated salts in the 3 MP and ROMP clusters compared to commercial synthetic HAP.
Fig. 5FTIR spectral view of the precipitated groups in MP samples for the different physicochemical parameters tested.
Fig. 6SEM images of MP and ROMP precipitated particles by treatment with 200× and 6000× magnification.