Negin Kamali1, Amin Talebi Bezmin Abadi2, Bezmin Abadi1, Farid Rahimi3, Mojgan Forootan4. 1. Department of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 2. Department of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. amin.talebi@modares.ac.ir. 3. Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, ACT, Australia. 4. Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcomes of infection by S. gallolyticus have not been investigated extensively. We aimed to determine the prevalence of S. gallolyticus in tumor specimens obtained from Iranian patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the presence of S. gallolyticus in patients' tissue samples. RESULTS: Of 176 patients, 65 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer whereas 111 did not have any colon disease. No correlation was found between age, colonization with S. gallolyticus, gender, or risk factors. Overall, 72 (40%) patients carried S. gallolyticus; only 29% of the patients without colorectal cancer were positive for S. gallolyticus. Diagnosis of colorectal cancer and presence of S. gallolyticus significantly correlated (P = 0.006; odds ratio = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.21-3.87). Among the patients with colorectal cancer, 39 (60%) were positive with S. gallolyticus (P = 0.006) whereas 33 of 111 (29.7%) control subjects were positive for S. gallolyticus (P > 0.05); thus, 70.3% of the control subjects were not infected with S. gallolyticus. We found a high prevalence of S. gallolyticus among an Iranian cohort of patients with colorectal cancer. Despite previous reports, we report a positive correlation between colorectal cancer and S. gallolyticus colonization.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcomes of infection by S. gallolyticus have not been investigated extensively. We aimed to determine the prevalence of S. gallolyticus in tumor specimens obtained from Iranian patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the presence of S. gallolyticus in patients' tissue samples. RESULTS: Of 176 patients, 65 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer whereas 111 did not have any colon disease. No correlation was found between age, colonization with S. gallolyticus, gender, or risk factors. Overall, 72 (40%) patients carried S. gallolyticus; only 29% of the patients without colorectal cancer were positive for S. gallolyticus. Diagnosis of colorectal cancer and presence of S. gallolyticus significantly correlated (P = 0.006; odds ratio = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.21-3.87). Among the patients with colorectal cancer, 39 (60%) were positive with S. gallolyticus (P = 0.006) whereas 33 of 111 (29.7%) control subjects were positive for S. gallolyticus (P > 0.05); thus, 70.3% of the control subjects were not infected with S. gallolyticus. We found a high prevalence of S. gallolyticus among an Iranian cohort of patients with colorectal cancer. Despite previous reports, we report a positive correlation between colorectal cancer and S. gallolyticus colonization.
Diverse species make up the microbiome of the human large intestines, which is estimated to contain 1014 aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The intestinal microbiome interacts with the host mainly symbiotically [1, 2] and contributes to several aspects of human health, including nutrient processing and uptake, metabolism, physiology, and immune function. Disturbing the balanced but complex host–microbiome interactions can cause different diseases including inflammatory bowel disease, hepatic steatosis, obesity, diabetes, and colorectal cancer (CRC) [3].CRC is the fourth most common cancer reported worldwide [4]. Almost one million new cases of CRC with 600,000 casualties are recorded yearly [5]. CRC, like any cancer, is a multifactorial disease. Cancers initiate by convergence of many interacting underlying factors including colonization by certain infectious agents [6]. As described by Reddy et al. in 1975, CRC occurrence is associated with colonization of intestines by certain bacteria [7], though understandably, every putative association may not represent causation. The mechanisms by which bacterial agents may cause CRC are yet to be discovered..Microorganisms with carcinogenic potential include opportunistic and anaerobic bacteria, some of which are involved in the early stages of CRC; one of these anaerobic bacteria is Streptococcus gallolyticus. S. gallolyticus is a gram-positive, opportunistic, immobile, round or oval bacterium [8]. Based on its biochemical properties, S. gallolyticus has been classified into three biotypes: biotype I, biotype II/1, and biotype II/2. The biotype I can ferment mannitol; this specific biochemical characteristic distinguishes the biotype I from biotype II [9]. Biotype I corresponds to S. gallolyticus subspecies gallolyticus Sgg [10]. This subspecies is opportunistic and can cause infective endocarditis, bacteremia, sepsis, hepatic disorders, or gastrointestinal cancers [11]. Though Sgg normally inhabits the gastrointestinal tract, present findings about Sgg suggest that the pathogenic mechanisms evoked by Sgg colonization may lead to CRC [10].Understanding the mechanisms underlying CRC development requires sophisticated studies. Many studies, including recent meta-analyses have shown that Sgg is more common in patients with CRC than in healthy subjects although contradictory studies also abound [12-16]. Collective in vitro knowledge implicates Sgg in the CRC development because they are thought to enhance the proliferation of cancer cells through the β-catenin signaling pathway as studied in the murine colon cells [6]. Sgg may cause disease also because it highly depends on the type IV collagen in the colonic mucosa and stimulates expression of the proinflammatory cytokines (for example, interleukin-1, interleukin-8, and cyclooxygenase-2 via NF-κB activation) that enhance cell proliferation and angiogenesis by inhibiting apoptosis, thus leading to the CRC development [11].In this cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of Sgg among the CRC tissue samples obtained from Iranian patients.
Main text
Patients and methods
We enrolled 176 patients who were referred to the Colonoscopy Unit of the Mehrad Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from June 2019 to August 2020. The patients underwent colonoscopy after clinical examination by a physician and completed the informed consent forms and a questionnaire on demographic characteristics and history of drug prescriptions. A skilled gastroenterologist diagnosed the cases based on the patients’ clinical presentations and pathological examinations. All patients were admitted for curative interventions. Biopsy samples (n = 352, two specimens per patient) were collected. The first biopsy sample was fixed in 10% buffered formalin for pathological examinations; the second sample was collected in a 2-mL cryotube containing the thioglycollate broth and transported to the microbiology laboratory within 4 h of colonoscopy for DNA extraction and PCR. During surgical sampling, the colonoscope and surgical instruments were frequently disinfected. The study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran (Ethics application: IR.MODARES.REC.1398.232) and complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients participated voluntarily and were allowed to leave the study if they wanted.The second sample of each patient was used for extraction of genomic DNA by using a commercial kit (Roje Technologies, Yazd, Iran); extracted DNA was purified according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of purified DNA was estimated at λ = 260 nm using a spectrophotometer (WPA, Biochrom, UK). DNA was stored in a freezer at − 20 °C until used. DNA extraction and PCR controls were the β-globin sequence as previously described [14]. To design the PCR primers, the DNASTAR Lasergene software (https://www.dnastar.com/software/lasergene/) was used to find a conserved sequence. Different factors like primer melting temperature, a reasonable G + C content, and low probability of primer-dimer formation were analyzed. Primers listed in Table 1 were added in a 15-µL reaction mix containing 1 µL of bacterial chromosomal DNA (≈ 180 ng), 0.5 µM of each primer, 1 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.10 U/µL Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR reaction was performed in a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). RecA as a conserved genetic region was selected to confirm the Sgg colonization in patients’ samples. To ensure the validity of the PCR experiments, a second operator rechecked 20 samples randomly. We used the ATCC 49475 and a clinically characterized S. gallolyticus strain as positive controls in the PCR experiments.
Table 1
Primers used in the study
Primer
Oligonucleotide sequence(5’–3’)
Tm (°C)
Product (bp)
References
rec -F
rec -R
TGGTCAAGCTCAGCACCAAT
TACACAAGCCAGACGGTTCC
67
361
This study
β-globin
ACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC
CAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC
50
110
[14]
Primers used in the studyrec -Frec -RTGGTCAAGCTCAGCACCAATTACACAAGCCAGACGGTTCCACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGCCAACTTCATCCACGTTCACCAll PCR products were visualized following electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels (Sina-clon, Tehran, Iran) in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), staining with GelRed, ultraviolet transillumination (Biometra, Germany), and digital imaging.Statistical analyses, including correlations between the presence of recA and CRC diagnosis, were performed using VassarStats: Website for Statistical Computation (http://vassarstats.net/odds2x2.html). p < 0.05 was taken as statistical significance. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the correlations among different factors examined in the study.
Results and discussion
Out of 176 enrolled patients, based on colonoscopy and pathology findings, 65 were diagnosed with CRC; 111 had no record of CRC and were included as the control group. The participants were 40–60 years old; 56% and 43% of patients were male and female, respectively. All the patients’ samples were positive for β-globin by PCR. No significant association was observed between family history of cancer, age, and gender (P > 0.05). The prevalence of Sgg among the biopsy samples obtained from 176 patients was 40% (72/176). Importantly, of the patients with CRC, 39 were positive for S. gallolyticus (60%) (P = 0.006); meanwhile, 33 of the 111 control subjects (29.7%) were positive for Sgg (P > 0.05).Sgg is an intestinal inhabitant in herbivores and was initially isolated from Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) feces [10]. Sgg colonization in Homo Sapiens was documented by several researchers [17, 18], while ultrastructural studies have shown the role of several putative protein products of the pilus operons in facilitating bacterial attachment to the intestinal epithelium [19]. Sgg may serve as a promoter for initiation of CRC in infected cases [6, 10, 20]. Undoubtedly, CRC pathogenesis is multifactorial, and diverse mechanisms, including susceptible genetic traits, diet, infectious agents, and other environmental factors are implicated [21, 22]. Epidemiologic studies support the hypothesis that the risk of CRC may be high in patients colonized with Sgg [17, 23, 24]. Kumar et al. reported that Sgg contributes to the CRC development by promoting proliferation of the cancer cells [6]. Furthermore, direct interactions between the bacteria and intestinal cells may possibly promote proliferation of the cancer cells in subjects colonized with Sgg [25]. In this study, we confirmed the presence of Sgg in samples obtained from patients with CRC or non-CRC control subjects to better understand the correlation between colonization by this bacterium and CRC diagnosis. We enrolled 176 cases, one of the largest cohorts studied in Iran. Interestingly, we found that 60% of the patients with CRC were infected with Sgg (P = 0.006). In contrast, Mahmoudvand et al. reported 0% (0 out of 6) in colorectal adenocarcinoma biopsy tissues [14]. The differences between these studies could be explained by different population genetics or socioeconomic backgrounds of the studied cohorts. In disagreement with our study, a Malaysian group showed that 24% of all patients with CRC were infected with Sgg [26]. A quantitative study by Franch et al. showed that only 3.2% of a cohort of patients with CRC carried S. gallolyticus [4]. Despite geographical differences (Iran versus Spain), the method applied by Franch et al. differed from that in our study; therefore, such differences overshadow our understanding of the ultimate role of Sgg in CRC development. In an interesting study from southwest Iran, Sheikh et al. examined Sgg colonization in patients with CRC by stool sampling and PCR [27]. They found that (9/66) 13.6% of the patients were positive for Sgg. This finding highlights that Sgg can successfully colonize the non-CRC patients; however, we detailed comparative analyses are needed to elucidate the microbe–host interactions during the pathogenesis of CRC. In 2020, Eshaghi et al. reported that 5.5% of patients with CRC were positive for Sgg by PCR, the same approach was used in our study [28]. Additionally, Eshaghi et al. explored bacterial culturing as a comparison with PCR findings; they concluded that simultaneous use of both methods is not required to confirm this infection among the clinical samples, and a single method is sufficient [28]. Previously, we have encountered difficulties with culturing Sgg from both colon biopsies and stool samples. Thus, the late-growing nature of this bacterium encouraged us to exclude the culture method for detecting Sgg in samples but rely only on PCR. Our study is novel because we report a high prevalence of Sgg by PCR among an Iranian cohort of patients with CRC. Indeed, our understanding of bacterial causes of CRC or its association with occurrence of a specific bacterial colonization may guide the management of CRC. Sophisticated studies using molecular and biochemical analyses of patients’ samples will improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic life-threatening illnesses such as CRC.
Limitations
Our study has some limitations. We had aimed initially to enroll at least 100 patients with CRC but could not achieve that target number because the COVID-19 pandemic hindered the late stages of our study. Although our descriptive analysis of the clinical samples does not clarify a factual role for Sgg in the CRC development, we postulate that this bacterium is associated with CRC development either epidemiologically or causatively. Despite some contradictory findings, proving an unequivocal association between CRC and Sgg requires further molecular, biochemical, and mechanistic studies.
Authors: Mia Vanrobaeys; Peter De Herdt; Gerard Charlier; Richard Ducatelle; Freddy Haesebrouck Journal: Microbiology Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.777
Authors: Julia Butt; Mazda Jenab; Martina Willhauck-Fleckenstein; Angelika Michel; Michael Pawlita; Cecilie Kyrø; Anne Tjønneland; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Franck Carbonnel; Gianluca Severi; Rudolf Kaaks; Tilman Kühn; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Carlo la Vecchia; Anna Karakatsani; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Claudia Agnoli; Domenico Palli; Carlotta Sacerdote; H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita; Elisabete Weiderpass; Maria-José Sánchez; Catalina Bonet Bonet; José María Huerta; Eva Ardanaz; Kathryn Bradbury; Marc Gunter; Neil Murphy; Heinz Freisling; Elio Riboli; Kostas Tsilidis; Dagfinn Aune; Tim Waterboer; David J Hughes Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Maria Andres-Franch; Antonio Galiana; Victoria Sanchez-Hellin; Enrique Ochoa; Eva Hernandez-Illan; Pilar Lopez-Garcia; Adela Castillejo; Maria Isabel Castillejo; Victor Manuel Barbera; Josefa Garcia-Dura; Francisco Javier Gomez-Romero; Gloria Royo; Jose Luis Soto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240