Kim Phan1, Adele Budiansky2, Elizabeth Miller2, Philippe Phan3, Daniel Dubois4. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Orthopedics, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. dadubois@toh.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The prone position can lead to anatomical compression of the thoracic cavity resulting in reduced cardiac output, especially in the context of chest wall deformities commonly present in patients with scoliosis. There are no protocols for using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to optimize prone positioning and for safe use of TEE during cases requiring neuromonitoring. CLINICAL FEATURES: We present a case of a 23-yr-old male with Cornelia de Lange syndrome undergoing elective posterior spinal fusion for syndromic scoliosis who developed severe refractory hypotension and cardiac arrest in the prone position. After hemodynamic stabilization in the intensive care unit, the patient returned to the operating room on postoperative day 2 for completion of his spinal fusion. Transesophageal echocardiography determined the optimal position of longitudinal bolster placements associated with minimal left ventricular compression in the supine position. The patient was then proned and intraoperative hemodynamics during the second surgery remained stable. Owing to the special considerations of using TEE in the prone position with neuromonitoring, we describe technical aspects to consider to protect the equipment and patient. CONCLUSION: Patients with compliant chest walls or thoracic deformities are at risk of hemodynamic instability in the prone position. Intraoperative TEE can be used in the supine patient prior to proning to determine optimal longitudinal bolster positioning to minimize cardiac compression. Transesophageal echocardiography used during spine surgery in the prone position with neuromonitoring and motor-evoked potentials requires special considerations for patient safety.
PURPOSE: The prone position can lead to anatomical compression of the thoracic cavity resulting in reduced cardiac output, especially in the context of chest wall deformities commonly present in patients with scoliosis. There are no protocols for using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to optimize prone positioning and for safe use of TEE during cases requiring neuromonitoring. CLINICAL FEATURES: We present a case of a 23-yr-old male with Cornelia de Lange syndrome undergoing elective posterior spinal fusion for syndromic scoliosis who developed severe refractory hypotension and cardiac arrest in the prone position. After hemodynamic stabilization in the intensive care unit, the patient returned to the operating room on postoperative day 2 for completion of his spinal fusion. Transesophageal echocardiography determined the optimal position of longitudinal bolster placements associated with minimal left ventricular compression in the supine position. The patient was then proned and intraoperative hemodynamics during the second surgery remained stable. Owing to the special considerations of using TEE in the prone position with neuromonitoring, we describe technical aspects to consider to protect the equipment and patient. CONCLUSION: Patients with compliant chest walls or thoracic deformities are at risk of hemodynamic instability in the prone position. Intraoperative TEE can be used in the supine patient prior to proning to determine optimal longitudinal bolster positioning to minimize cardiac compression. Transesophageal echocardiography used during spine surgery in the prone position with neuromonitoring and motor-evoked potentials requires special considerations for patient safety.
Authors: James M Galas; Mary E van der Velde; S Devi Chiravuri; Frances Farley; David Parra; Gregory J Ensing Journal: Congenit Heart Dis Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Victor M Neira; Letizia Gardin; Gail Ryan; James Jarvis; Debashis Roy; William Splinter Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Blane T Bafus; Devi Chiravuri; Mary E van der Velde; Benjamin I Chu; Ronald Hirshl; Frances A Farley Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2008-08
Authors: Felipe Teran; Michael I Prats; Bret P Nelson; Ross Kessler; Michael Blaivas; Mary Ann Peberdy; Sasha K Shillcutt; Robert T Arntfield; David Bahner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniela Alexianu; Eric T Skolnick; Annie C Pinto; Susumu Ohkawa; David P Roye; David E Solowiejczyk; Joshua E Hyman; Lena S Sun Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.108