| Literature DB >> 36198902 |
Muriel Masi1, Julia Vergalli1, Jean-Marie Pagès2, Ishan Ghai3, Andrea Barba-Bon3, Thérèse Schembri1,4, Werner M Nau3, Daniel Lafitte1,4, Mathias Winterhalter3.
Abstract
Gram-negative porins are the main entry for small hydrophilic molecules. We studied translocation of structurally related cephalosporins, ceftazidime (CAZ), cefotaxime (CTX) and cefepime (FEP). CAZ is highly active on E. coli producing OmpF (Outer membrane protein F) but less efficient on cells expressing OmpC (Outer membrane protein C), whereas FEP and CTX kill bacteria regardless of the porin expressed. This matches with the different capacity of CAZ and FEP to accumulate into bacterial cells as quantified by LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry). Furthermore, porin reconstitution into planar lipid bilayer and zero current assays suggest permeation of ≈1,000 molecules of CAZ per sec and per channel through OmpF versus ≈500 through OmpC. Here, the instant killing is directly correlated to internal drug concentration. We propose that the net negative charge of CAZ represents a key advantage for permeation through OmpF porins that are less cation-selective than OmpC. These data could explain the decreased susceptibility to some cephalosporins of enterobacteria that exclusively express OmpC porins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36198902 PMCID: PMC9534850 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04035-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Biol ISSN: 2399-3642
Fig. 1Comparison of the metabolic inhibition of E. coli cells expressing individual OmpF or OmpC orthologues in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics by using a resazurin-reduction-based assay.
Actively metabolizing bacterial cells are able to reduce blue resazurin into red resofurin, which emits fluorescence at 590 nm. The experiment was performed on a microtiter plate and fluorescence was measured every 10 min with λex = 530 nm and λem = 590 nm. Inhibition of resazurin reduction in the presence of each antibiotic was translated into % metabolic inhibition. a W3110ΔFC expressing OmpF-type porins; b W3110ΔFC expressing OmpC-type porins. c W3110 expressing OmpF or OmpC and derivatives expressing constitutive AmpC β-lactamase from a plasmid were exposed to FEP or CAZ in the absence or in the presence of tazobactam and clavulanic acid (TC, 4 µg/ml each). Data plotted in Fig. 1a, b with strains expressing OmpF and OmpC are the mean (±SD) of three independent experiments. Results shown with boxplot in Fig. 1a, b were obtained from n = 6, 10, 7, 6, 5, 4 (CAZ); 6, 11, 7, 4, 11, 8 (FEP); 6, 11, 8, 6, 11, 9 (CTX); 3, 3, 5, 3, 7, 6 (PIP); 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3 (TIC); 6, 10, 5, 6, 10, 8 (ETP); 6, 11, 6, 6, 11, 9 (MEM) independent assays with strains expressing Omp35, OmpE35, OmpK35, Omp36, OmpE36, and OmpK36, respectively. Boxplots shown in Fig. 1a, b indicate the range from the first quartile to the third quartile of the distribution with boxes, the medians are indicated by a line across the boxes, and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points. Results plotted in Fig. 1c were obtained from n = 2 independent experiments.
Fig. 2Intracellular accumulation of CAZ and FEP in E. coli W3110ΔompC and W3110ΔompF.
Intracellular concentrations were obtained from incubation of bacteria with CAZ (a) or FEP (b) at 16 µg/ml. Bacterial suspensions were sampled at 5, 15, and 30 min for CFU determination and LC–MS/MS analysis of the intracellular concentrations. Accumulation is reported in a number of antibiotic molecules per CFU. Results were obtained from n = 3 independent experiments performed in triplicate. Results are shown with boxplots where the boxes range from the first quartile to the third quartile of the distribution, the median is indicated by a line across the box, and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points. ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc tests were used to determine differences between the two strains (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05). Concentrations of CAZ in W3110ΔompC and W3110ΔompF are significantly different at 5 and 15 min (F(1,18) = 38.35, P = 7.4 × 10−6 and F(1,14) = 35.34, P = 3.6 × 10−5). Concentrations of FEP accumulated in W3110ΔompC and W3110ΔompF are not significantly different.
Fig. 3Killing rates of CAZ and FEP during accumulation in E. coli W3110ΔompC and W3110ΔompF.
Bacteria were incubated with 16 µg/ml of CAZ (a) or FEP (b), and bacterial suspensions were sampled at 5, 15, and 30 min for CFU determination. The data were obtained from n = 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate or triplicate. Results are shown with boxplots where the boxes range from the first quartile to the third quartile of the distribution, the median is indicated by a line across the box, and the whiskers extend to the most extreme data points. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to determine differences in killing rates between the two strains. Killing rates of CAZ are significantly different between W3110ΔompC and W3110ΔompF (P = 8.4 × 10−7), while no significant difference was observed for the FEP killing rates.
Fig. 4Correlation between killing rate and intracellular accumulation of CAZ and FEP.
Intracellular accumulation of CAZ (a) and FEP (b) were measured at different time points during incubation with W3110ΔompC, W3110ΔompF, and W3110ΔCF. The corresponding coefficients of determination (R2) were 0.89 (n = 38) and 0.94 (n = 17), respectively.
Fig. 5Real-time permeation kinetics of CAZ and FEP through OmpF or OmpC porin channels as monitored by the FARMA method.
Shown is relative fluorescence intensity (λex = 339 nm; λex = 422 nm) of CB8/MDAP-loaded LUVs (15 μM phospholipids in 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.0) upon addition of 45 nM OmpF (a, b) or OmpC (c, d) at t = 60 s and, after reconstitution, of a given concentration of CAZ (a, c; 0–150 µM) or FEP (b, d; 0–200 µM) at t = 120 s. 25 µM of tryptophan amine was added for calibration at t = 600 s.
Multi-channel reversal potential experiments.
| Substrate (Concentration gradient Bi-ionic | Pore | Permeability ratio (cation:anion) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium chloride | OmpF | 13 ± 5 | 3.5:1 |
| Ceftazidime -Sodium | OmpF | 16 ± 4 | 5.2:1 |
| Cefotaxime -Sodium | OmpF | 18 ± 4 | 8:1 |
| Sodium chloride | OmpC | 16 ± 2.5 | 5.2:1 |
| Ceftazidime -Sodium | OmpC | 18.6 ± 3 | 8:1 |
| Cefotaxime -Sodium | OmpC | 17.1 ± 4.1 | 7:1 |
Bi-ionic reversal potential (±SD, n = 3) is needed to obtain zero current for a concentration gradient of 80 mM/30 mM of the respective antibiotic only. Using Goldmann–Hodgkin–Katz equation gives the permeability ratio of sodium chloride. cefotaxime (CTX−) and ceftazidime (CAZ−) for the ion current flux through OmpF and OmpC.