Tansel Mutlu1, Ibrahim Eke2, Mehmet Akif Akcal3, Huseyin Iret4. 1. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Gebze Private Yuzyıl Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey. 2. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Ataturk State Hospital, Ucgen Mah, Gulluk Cad. No:100, Antalya, Turkey. dribrahimeke@gmail.com. 3. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Ataturk State Hospital, Ucgen Mah, Gulluk Cad. No:100, Antalya, Turkey. 4. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Karabuk, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Freiberg's disease is mostly characterized by osteonecrosis of second metatarsal head and is widely seen in adolescent women. Metatarsal head restoration technique is a novel surgical procedure intended to protect intact articular surface and regenerate avascular bone under cartilage. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the results and clinical outcomes of metatarsal head restoration technique with those of dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy technique in patients with advanced-stage Freiberg's disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 60 patients who were operated for Freiberg's disease were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups as who underwent metatarsal head restoration and dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Groups were compared according to "American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score" (AOFAS), "visual analog score" (VAS) and passive "range of motion" (ROM) score. RESULTS: Thirty-two feet of 29 patients underwent metatarsal head restoration, while 33 feet of 31 patients were subject to dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Mean AOFAS score increased from 58.72 ± 6.89 to 89.35 ± 7.43 following metatarsal head restoration, while it increased from 54.13 ± 6.12 to 78.24 ± 6.54 after dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Mean VAS score decreased from 6.89 ± 1.18 to 1.33 ± 0.64 after metatarsal head restoration, while it decreased from 6.64 ± 0.92 to 2.71 ± 1.91 following dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Mean ROM increased from 12.25° ± 1.65 to 56.28° ± 2.77 after metatarsal head restoration, and it increased from 11.18° ± 0.66 to 47.65° ± 2.05 after dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy (all p < 0.05). In addition, postoperative mean AOFAS (p = 0.044), VAS (p = 0.041) and passive ROM (p = 0.034) scores improvement were found to be statistically significantly better in the metatarsal head restoration group. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that metatarsal head restoration is a safe and successful surgical technique. It leads to better results than dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy in patients with stages 3-4 Freiberg's disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Freiberg's disease is mostly characterized by osteonecrosis of second metatarsal head and is widely seen in adolescent women. Metatarsal head restoration technique is a novel surgical procedure intended to protect intact articular surface and regenerate avascular bone under cartilage. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the results and clinical outcomes of metatarsal head restoration technique with those of dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy technique in patients with advanced-stage Freiberg's disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 60 patients who were operated for Freiberg's disease were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups as who underwent metatarsal head restoration and dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Groups were compared according to "American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score" (AOFAS), "visual analog score" (VAS) and passive "range of motion" (ROM) score. RESULTS: Thirty-two feet of 29 patients underwent metatarsal head restoration, while 33 feet of 31 patients were subject to dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Mean AOFAS score increased from 58.72 ± 6.89 to 89.35 ± 7.43 following metatarsal head restoration, while it increased from 54.13 ± 6.12 to 78.24 ± 6.54 after dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Mean VAS score decreased from 6.89 ± 1.18 to 1.33 ± 0.64 after metatarsal head restoration, while it decreased from 6.64 ± 0.92 to 2.71 ± 1.91 following dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy. Mean ROM increased from 12.25° ± 1.65 to 56.28° ± 2.77 after metatarsal head restoration, and it increased from 11.18° ± 0.66 to 47.65° ± 2.05 after dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy (all p < 0.05). In addition, postoperative mean AOFAS (p = 0.044), VAS (p = 0.041) and passive ROM (p = 0.034) scores improvement were found to be statistically significantly better in the metatarsal head restoration group. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that metatarsal head restoration is a safe and successful surgical technique. It leads to better results than dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy in patients with stages 3-4 Freiberg's disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Sang Ki Lee; Moon Sang Chung; Goo Hyun Baek; Joo Han Oh; Young Ho Lee; Hyun Sik Gong Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 2.827