| Literature DB >> 36197175 |
Eyal Ben-Arie1, Bernice Lottering1, Chanya Inprasit2, Hei-Tung Yip3,4, Wen-Chao Ho5, Gil Ton1, Yu-Chen Lee1,6,7, Pei-Yu Kao8,9.
Abstract
Oral cancer is frequently associated with smoking, alcohol consumption, and betel quid chewing, which are common harmful behaviors observed in certain cohorts of the Taiwanese population. Some reports have explored the potential therapeutic effect of certain herbal remedies on cancer treatments and the outcomes thereof. However, supportive evidence regarding the specific use of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in oral cancer treatment is lacking and deserves further investigation. This study measured the use of TCM therapies for oral cancer in a Taiwanese population-based retrospective longitudinal cohort study. The Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was utilized to conduct this study. The study population was limited to oral cancer patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2009, which were followed up for at least 5 years. Therapeutic strategies investigated included acupuncture and the Chinese herbs and formula used. Additionally, the frequency of TCM treatment visits, total medical costs, and all-cause mortality were also analyzed. Between 2000 and 2009, a total of 951 patients were diagnosed with various oral cancers. 13.7% of the diagnosed patients utilized TCM treatment measures. The majority of the patients were males. The top 3 common single herbs used were Xuán shēn (Radix Scrophulariae), Shí hú (Herba Dendrobii), and Mài mén dōng (Ophiopogon Japonicus). Then, Gān lù yǐn, Zhī bǎi dì huáng wán, and Sàn zhǒng kuì jiān tāng were the most frequently used herbal formulas. The survival probability was higher in TCM users when compared to non-TCM users in 5- and 12-year all-cause mortality (P < .05). This study explored the use of TCM therapies in oral cancer patients and identified essential information regarding the specifics of conventional herbal medicine used, affiliated medical costs, survival probability, and common symptoms observed in Taiwanese oral cancer patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36197175 PMCID: PMC9509120 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Patients demographics.
| Characteristics | Non-TCM (N = 821) | TCM (N = 130) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Sex | .04 | ||||
| Female | 77 | 9.4 | 20 | 15.4 | |
| Male | 744 | 90.6 | 110 | 84.6 | |
| Age, yr | .10 | ||||
| ≤49 | 304 | 37.0 | 58 | 44.6 | |
| 50–64 | 336 | 40.9 | 53 | 40.8 | |
| ≥65 | 181 | 22.0 | 19 | 14.6 | |
| Mean age (SD) | 54.08 | 12.9 | 51.74 | 11.7 | .05 |
| Monthly income (NTD) | .16 | ||||
| <15,000 | 206 | 25.1 | 25 | 19.2 | |
| 15,000–20,000 | 349 | 42.5 | 53 | 40.8 | |
| >20,000 | 266 | 32.4 | 52 | 40.0 | |
| Urbanization | .28 | ||||
| Low | 373 | 45.4 | 68 | 52.3 | |
| Medium | 261 | 31.8 | 39 | 30.0 | |
| High | 187 | 22.8 | 23 | 17.7 | |
| Occupation | .17 | ||||
| Office Workers | 325 | 39.6 | 61 | 46.9 | |
| Agricultural Workers | 398 | 48.5 | 59 | 45.4 | |
| Other | 98 | 11.9 | 10 | 7.7 | |
| Residential location | .02 | ||||
| Northern | 273 | 33.3 | 36 | 27.7 | |
| Central | 235 | 28.6 | 56 | 43.1 | |
| Southern | 289 | 35.2 | 34 | 26.2 | |
| Eastern | 23 | 2.8 | 4 | 3.1 | |
| Other | 1 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Service providers | .27 | ||||
| Medical Center | 797 | 97.1 | 125 | 96.2 | |
| Regional Hospital | 17 | 2.1 | 5 | 3.8 | |
| District Hospital | 7 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Comorbidities | |||||
| Hypertension | 368 | 44.8 | 50 | 38.5 | .17 |
| Diabetes | 218 | 26.6 | 22 | 16.9 | .02 |
| CHF | 68 | 8.3 | 7 | 5.8 | .25 |
| Stroke | 119 | 14.5 | 13 | 10.0 | .17 |
| COPD | 185 | 22.5 | 31 | 23.8 | .74 |
| Cirrhosis | 8 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | .26 |
| CKD | 97 | 11.8 | 7 | 5.4 | .03 |
| Anemia | 146 | 17.8 | 17 | 13.1 | .19 |
| Malignant neoplasm of bronchus and lung | 1 | 0.1 | 1 | 0.8 | .13 |
| CCI | .26 | ||||
| 0 | 813 | 99.0 | 130 | 100.0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| ≥2 | 8 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Treatment | |||||
| Western therapy | 283 | 34.5 | 56 | 43.1 | .06 |
| Oral cancer surgery | 89 | 10.8 | 16 | 12.3 | .62 |
| Number of visits, mean (SD) | 12.4 | 21.2 | |||
| Length of TCM use (mo) months, mean (SD) | 9.73 | 16.1 | |||
The table represents the general characteristics recorded in the included cohort of oral cancer patients. Data are presented as mean, SD, number of patients (N), and percentage value (%). Significant levels are considered as P values of <.05.
CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index, CHF = congestive heart failure, CKD = chronic kidney disease, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SD = standard deviation.
Common symptoms leading to medical consultation 5 years post-diagnosis.
| Symptoms after 5 years | Non-TCM (N = 821) | TCM (N = 130) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | OR | N | % | cOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |||
| Pain | 20 | 2.44 | 1.00 (reference) | 8 | 6.15 | 2.63 (1.13, 6.09) | .02 | 2.50 (1.02, 6.14) | .05 |
| Dyspnea and respiratory abnormalities | 42 | 5.12 | 1.00 (reference) | 7 | 5.38 | 1.06 (0.46, 2.40) | .90 | 1.02 (0.43, 2.43) | .96 |
| Malnutrition | 29 | 3.53 | 1.00 (reference) | 5 | 3.85 | 1.09 (0.42, 2.87) | .86 | 0.97 (0.36, 2.63) | .95 |
| Cachexia | 50 | 6.09 | 1.00 (reference) | 11 | 8.46 | 1.43 (0.72, 2.82) | .31 | 1.40 (0.69, 2.84) | .35 |
| Oral soft tissues symptoms | 51 | 6.21 | 1.00 (reference) | 18 | 13.85 | 2.43 (1.37, 4.30) | .002 | 2.68 (1.44, 4.96) | .002 |
| Neoplasms | 0 | 0.00 | 1.00 (reference) | 0 | 0.00 | ||||
| Alcohol related | 15 | 1.83 | 1.00 (reference) | 2 | 1.54 | 0.84 (0.19, 3.71) | .82 | 0.60 (0.12, 2.94) | .53 |
| Digestive system disease | 89 | 10.8 | 1.00 (reference) | 16 | 12.3 | 1.15 (0.65, 2.04) | .62 | 1.10 (0.60, 2.02) | .75 |
| Injury | 53 | 6.46 | 1.00 (reference) | 8 | 6.15 | 0.95 (0.44, 2.05) | .90 | 0.90 (0.40, 2.01) | .80 |
| Other | 131 | 16.0 | 1.00 (reference) | 27 | 20.8 | 1.38 (0.87, 2.19) | .17 | 1.33 (0.81, 2.17) | .26 |
Data are presented as number of patients (N) and % thereof, OR, cOR, aOR, and CI.
aOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confident interval, cOR = crude odds ratios, OR = odds ratios.
P value < .05.
P value < .01.
Total medical cost of oral cancer patients at 1-year post-diagnosis follow up.
| Medical cost after 1 year | Non-TCM (N = 821) | TCM (N = 130) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Outpatient visit | |||||
| Diagnosis | 6195 | 5879 | 7929 | 5717 | .002 |
| Treatment | 57,524 | 101,598 | 58,996 | 80,425 | .86 |
| Drug | 38,627 | 88,746 | 61,276 | 88,145 | .11 |
| Total | 76,673 | 113,213 | 85,945 | 93,895 | .38 |
| Hospitalization | |||||
| Diagnosis | 16,268 | 13,198 | 17,061 | 13,030 | .62 |
| Drug therapy | 69,968 | 100,696 | 75,690 | 10,857 | .67 |
| Radiotherapy | 44,014 | 78,165 | 454,831 | 75,257 | .88 |
| Other therapies | 13,074 | 19,261 | 11,210 | 17,185 | .41 |
| Surgery | 58,380 | 62,322 | 79,069 | 77,546 | .14 |
| Total | 319,706 | 314,347 | 339,184 | 323,449 | .62 |
Data are presented in mean and SD.
SD = standard deviation, TCM = traditional Chinese medicine.
Statistical significance is considered as a P value of <.05.
Top 10 traditional Chinese single herbs and herbal formulas used.
| Single herbs | Herbal formulas | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 玄參 Xuán shēn (Radix Scrophulariae) | 甘露飲 Gān lù yǐn |
| 2 | 石斛 Shí hú (Herba Dendrobii) | 知柏地黃丸 Zhī bǎi dì huáng wán |
| 3 | 麥門冬 Mài mén dōng (Ophiopogon Japonicus) | 散腫潰堅湯 Sàn zhǒng kuì jiān tāng |
| 4 | 山查 Shān chá (Fructus Crataegi) | 歸脾湯 Guī pí tāng |
| 5 | 川芎 Chuān xiōng (Rhizoma Ligustici Wallichii) | 一貫煎 Yī guàn jiān |
| 6 | 半夏 Bàn xià (Rhizoma Pinelliae Preparatum) | 十六味流氣飲 Shí liù wèi liú qì yǐn |
| 7 | 白朮 Bái zhú (Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae) | 加味逍遙散 Jiā wèi xiāo yáo sàn |
| 8 | 合歡皮 Hé huān pí (Cortex Albizziae) | 平胃散 Píng wèi sàn |
| 9 | 地骨皮 Di gǔ pí (Cortex Lycii) | 甘麥大棗湯 Gān mài dà zǎo tāng |
| 10 | 百合 Bǎihé (Bulbus Lilii) | 生脈飲 Shēng mài yǐn |
The numbers 1–10 represent the order of the most common (1) to the least common (10).
Figure 1.(A) Graphical representation of the 5 years all-cause mortality in both groups. (B) Graphical representation of the 5 years all-cause mortality in both groups. Significant levels are presented as a P value < .05.
The 5- and 12-year all-cause mortality analysis.
| 5-year all-cause mortality | 12-year all-cause mortality | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted HR | 95% CI | Adjusted HR | 95% CI | |
| TCM non-users | 1.00 | Reference | 1.00 | Reference |
| TCM users | 0.57 | 0.40, 0.82** | 0.64 | 0.48, 0.85** |
The table represents the risk for all-cause mortality in TCM users compared to non-TCM users. The HR and CI were adjusted by age, gender, CKD, and diabetes comorbidities.
CKD = chronic kidney diseases, CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio, TCM = traditional Chinese medicine.
**P value < .01.