Acupuncture is a complex treatment comprising multisensory stimulation, including visual and tactile sensations and experiences of body ownership. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of these three components of acupuncture stimulation in acupuncture analgesia. 40 healthy volunteers participated in the study and received acupuncture treatment under three different conditions (real-hand, rubber-hand synchronous, and rubber-hand asynchronous). The tolerance for heat pain stimuli was measured before and after treatment. Brain oscillation changes were also measured using electroencephalography (EEG). The pain tolerance was significantly increased after acupuncture treatment under all three conditions. Noticeable deqi (needle) sensations in response to acupuncture stimulation of the rubber hand were found under both rubber-hand synchronous and rubber-hand asynchronous conditions. Deqi sensations were significantly correlated with acupuncture analgesia only under the rubber-hand synchronous condition. Increased delta and decreased theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves were observed after acupuncture treatment under all three conditions. Our findings clarified the role of cognitive components of acupuncture treatment in acupuncture analgesia through the rubber-hand illusion. This study is a first step toward separating various components of acupuncture analgesia, i.e. visual, tactile, and body ownership, and utilizing those components to maximize analgesic effects.
Acupuncture is a complex treatment comprising multisensory stimulation, including visual and tactile sensations and experiences of body ownership. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of these three components of acupuncture stimulation in acupuncture analgesia. 40 healthy volunteers participated in the study and received acupuncture treatment under three different conditions (real-hand, rubber-hand synchronous, and rubber-hand asynchronous). The tolerance for heat pain stimuli was measured before and after treatment. Brain oscillation changes were also measured using electroencephalography (EEG). The pain tolerance was significantly increased after acupuncture treatment under all three conditions. Noticeable deqi (needle) sensations in response to acupuncture stimulation of the rubber hand were found under both rubber-hand synchronous and rubber-hand asynchronous conditions. Deqi sensations were significantly correlated with acupuncture analgesia only under the rubber-hand synchronous condition. Increased delta and decreased theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves were observed after acupuncture treatment under all three conditions. Our findings clarified the role of cognitive components of acupuncture treatment in acupuncture analgesia through the rubber-hand illusion. This study is a first step toward separating various components of acupuncture analgesia, i.e. visual, tactile, and body ownership, and utilizing those components to maximize analgesic effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
Acupuncture analgesia; body ownership; deqi sensation; electroencephalography; rubber-hand illusion
Acupuncture is a complex treatment comprising multisensory stimulation that interacts
with various factors.
Not only tactile but also visual components of acupuncture stimulation are
involved in acupuncture analgesia. Recently, phantom acupuncture, which lacks the
somatosensory component of acupuncture treatment, was developed by playing video
clips of acupuncture treatment.[2-4] Such phantom acupuncture can
induce autonomic responses similar to acupuncture in healthy volunteers
and pain relief among patients with low back pain by shifting attention to
the self and disengaging physical pain processing.[2,4] Furthermore, pain can be
modulated by watching a video of acupuncture administered to one’s own
body.[5,6] Video-guided
acupuncture imagery might be beneficial for short-term pain severity reduction in
patients with chronic low back pain,
although more definitive evidence is needed. Furthermore, an imagined
experience of acupuncture increased the pain threshold through deactivation of the
rostral anterior cingulate cortex and regional connectivity and structural changes
in the anterior insula.[6,7]
These studies highlight the importance of credibility in the acupuncture treatment
context.Body ownership, the feeling that one’s body belongs to oneself, is regarded as a
crucial factor in self-awareness.
The rubber-hand illusion (RHI) is a multisensory integration paradigm that is
used experimentally to manipulate body ownership of the hand,
usually by congruent associations of tactile and visual information. A few
studies have identified the effect of body ownership in the brain-body responses to
acupuncture. For example, when modifying bodily awareness by manipulation of bodily
ownership and visual expectation using RHI, the visual expectation of needle
stimulation exhibited a greater sympathetic activation to acupuncture stimulation.
In addition, successful RHI significantly reduced brain activation in the
insula during acupuncture stimulation to the real hand.
When the rubber hand was fully incorporated with subjects’ own bodies,
acupuncture stimulation to the rubber hand produced deqi sensations
as well as brain activations associated with the interoceptive system, such as
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and insula.
Lee et al. also demonstrated the neural circuits involved in the recovery of
body ownership by visual and tactile component of acupuncture, and they found a
crucial role of the connectivity patterns between the parietal and frontal
multimodal areas.
Recently, placebo treatment applied to a rubber hand during RHI was shown to
produce placebo analgesia, indicating that embodiment might influence placebo effects.
Furthermore, looking at a virtual body collocated with the real one can have
analgesic effects.
However, to date no study has investigated the role of multiple components
(visual, tactile, and body ownership) which affect acupuncture analgesic effects
using RHI paradigm and electroencephalography (EEG).The aim of this study was to investigate the role of three components of acupuncture
stimulation (visual, tactile, and body ownership) in acupuncture analgesia using the
RHI paradigm. In this study, we compared the pain reduction capabilities of
acupuncture treatment involving (1) a real-hand condition (Real: visual, tactile,
and body ownership components), (2) a rubber-hand synchronous condition (Sync:
visual and body ownership components), and (3) a rubber-hand asynchronous condition
(Async: visual component only). We also examined changes in brain oscillations
during acupuncture treatment under the three different conditions using EEG.
Methods
Participants
In total, 40 healthy right-handed participants (19 male and 21 female, age = 22.6
± 13.2) recruited by advertisement from Kyung Hee University took part in this
3-day experiment. The participants had no history of cardiovascular disease,
neurological or psychological disorders, cognitive impairments, or pain
disorders; they were also prohibited from consuming alcohol, caffeine, or any
other drugs during the experiments. Among them, 30 participants had previously
experienced acupuncture treatment while 10 participants had no experience. They
were informed about the experiment and told that they could withdraw from the
study at any time without penalty or loss of benefits. All participants provided
written informed consent. This investigation was conducted in accordance with
the guidelines issued by the Human Subjects Committee and approved by the
Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of
Korea (IRB approval number: KHSIRB-20-101). The trial was registered with the
Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, Trial Registration Number:
KCT0005584).The effect size d of analgesic effect between post-treatment and
pre-treatment in open-label placebo acupuncture was about 0.43 based on our
previous study.
Considering the effect size of placebo analgesia in the previous study,
we estimated that approximately 40 participants would be needed in each group
for alpha level 0.05 and 80% power.
Experimental design and procedures
The setup of the RHI experiments followed standard procedures and was executed
almost identically to the previous studies, i.e. by placing a rubber hand in
front of participants while their left hand was hidden from sight. The
experiments employed a within-subject cross-over design with three conditions:
(1) a real-hand condition (Real: visual, tactile, and body ownership
components); (2) a rubber-hand synchronous condition (Sync: visual and body
ownership components); and (3) a rubber-hand asynchronous condition (Async:
visual component). The experiment included four sessions: (1) pre-pain rating
and pre-session rest (240 s); (2) brush-stroking session (150 s); (3) needle
stimulation session (600 s: intervals of stimulation ranged from 6–10 s); and
(4) post-pain rating and post-session rest (240 s). EEG was recorded throughout
the entire experiment and the EEG analysis was conducted during two rest periods
before and after treatment. For all three conditions, an acupuncture needle was
inserted at acupoint LI4 on the hand before the beginning of the RHI induction
session, and participants received 10 min of acupuncture needle stimulation to
the left hand (real or rubber hand) immediately after brush stroking (Figure 1(a)).
Figure 1.
(a) Experimental procedures. The experiment included four sessions:
(1) pre-pain rating and pre-session rest (240 s); (2) brush-stroking
session (150 s); (3) needle stimulation session (600 s: intervals of
stimulation ranged from 6–10 s); and (4) post-pain rating and
post-session rest (240 s). (b) Experimental conditions. Two
paintbrushes were used to stroke the rubber hand and the
participant’s own hidden left hand synchronously under one condition
(synchronous condition: Sync) and asynchronously under the other
condition (asynchronous condition: Async). The acupuncture was
applied at acupoint LI4 on the participant’s left hand for the Real
condition, and the same acupoint on the rubber hand was stimulated
for the Sync and Async conditions.
(a) Experimental procedures. The experiment included four sessions:
(1) pre-pain rating and pre-session rest (240 s); (2) brush-stroking
session (150 s); (3) needle stimulation session (600 s: intervals of
stimulation ranged from 6–10 s); and (4) post-pain rating and
post-session rest (240 s). (b) Experimental conditions. Two
paintbrushes were used to stroke the rubber hand and the
participant’s own hidden left hand synchronously under one condition
(synchronous condition: Sync) and asynchronously under the other
condition (asynchronous condition: Async). The acupuncture was
applied at acupoint LI4 on the participant’s left hand for the Real
condition, and the same acupoint on the rubber hand was stimulated
for the Sync and Async conditions.Participants experienced the three conditions on three separate days. On the
first day, the Real condition was used to allow participants to experience both
acupuncture and the associated deqi sensations. The rubber-hand
conditions (Sync and Async) were conducted on the second and third days in
random order selected by applying the random function in Excel. Sham acupuncture
relies on the visual impression that the needle is being inserted to the
skin.[16,17] It has been commonly used as a placebo control for
acupuncture research. However, the validity was limited when using sham
acupuncture out of sight of the participants.[18,19] Due to limitations of
sham acupuncture, we did not include the fourth condition (sham acupuncture on
the real hand) in this study.
Pain measurement
Heat pain stimuli were applied to the right index finger before and after the
acupuncture stimulation session. Pain tolerance (finger withdrawal latency) for
thermal pain were measured using a heat pain device (Ugo Basile, Italy). This
device can measure the nociceptive tolerance accurately using infrared heat
stimuli to the finger.[20,21] Participants were told to withdraw their fingers when
they could no longer tolerate the pain caused by the heat stimulation. A
practice session for heat stimuli before the start of the session involved
applying the stimuli to their right middle finger.To estimate the amount of temperature when subjects were delivered heat stimuli,
the temperature was additionally measured using thermosensor (Temperature Pods,
ADInstruments, Bella Vista, Australia) (Supplementary Figure 1). In this study, we evaluated the finger
withdrawal latency as pain tolerance and the amount of the temperature
varied.
Rubber-hand illusion induction
Participants were instructed to fixate on the rubber hand (Korean Prosthetic
Limbs Research Institute, Seoul, Korea), not to look elsewhere, and to focus on
the sensations of the hand they were viewing. They were also told not to move
any of their fingers or their body. The distance between the lateral side of the
rubber hand and the participant’s own hand was set at 15.5 cm. Different-sized
rubber hands were used according to sex (male: 38 cm, female: 32 cm). The
acupuncture needle was inserted into the rubber hand at acupoint LI4. Two
paintbrushes were used to stroke the rubber hand and the participant’s own
hidden left hand synchronously under the Sync condition and asynchronously under
the Async condition. To maintain the timeline of the experiment, under the Real
condition, we also stroked the participant’s left hand using the same
paintbrush. Participants were told that stroking was used to assess how the
brain reacts to tactile stimuli (Figure 1(b)).After brush stroking for 150 s, acupuncture stimulation to the rubber hand was
performed for 10 min. After the acupuncture stimulation sessions were completed,
participants rated their perception of RHI using the Rubber Hand Illusion
Perception Scale, which includes six questions. The first three questions
(Q1–Q3) were the main question and were designed to correspond to the RHI. The
last three items (Q4–Q6) were control question. In this study, the questionnaire
items were adapted from Mohan
’s study consisting of six questions. At the end of the session,
participants were also instructed to provide detailed answers in an open-end
interview about their experience of RHI induction and changes in their
perception during the experiment.
Acupuncture stimulation and deqi sensation rating
Acupuncture needle stimulation was applied by a licensed and experienced Doctor
of Korean Medicine (D.C.) and consisted of rotating the needle at a frequency of
1 Hz for a period of 2 s: 60 stimulations were included over 10 min of
acupuncture stimulation, with intervals between acupuncture stimulations ranging
from 6–10 s. Acupuncture needles, 40 mm long and 0.20 mm in diameter, were
inserted about 15 mm deep (K.M.S, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea). Before
the experiment, the practitioner was trained for acupuncture manipulations using
Acupuncture Manipulation Education System in order to deliver the similar visual
expectations on acupuncture stimulation.[23,24]All participants received acupuncture stimulation at acupoint LI4 on the dorsum
of the left hand, radial to the midpoint of the second metacarpal (Real). The
LI4 acupoint is widely used for analgesic effects and was simple to use in this
experiment due to its position on the hand. Under the rubber-hand conditions
(Sync/Async), participants received acupuncture stimulation to the rubber hand
with the needle inserted at the same location as for the real-hand condition.
After the acupuncture stimulation, participants were asked to rate the intensity
of deqi sensations (soreness, aching, deep pressure, heaviness,
fullness/distension, tingling, numbness, sharp pain, dull pain, warmth, cold,
and throbbing) on a scale from 0 (no perceived tactile sensation) to 10 (very
intense tactile sensation) using a Korean version of the Massachusetts General
Hospital Acupuncture Sensation Scale (MASS), and the sum of sensation values was
then calculated.
Electroencephalography recording and analysis
This study used a 32-channel EEG device (BrainAmp Family, BrainProduct, GmbH,
Germany) with electrodes placed at 10–20 system channel locations (Fp1, F3, F7,
FT9, FC5, FC1, C3, T7, TP9, CP5, CP1, Pz, P3, P7, O1, Oz, O2, P4, P8, TP10, CP6,
CP2, Cz, C4, T8, FT10, FC6, FC2, F4, F8, Fp2). The Fz electrode was used as the
reference channel, and the ground electrode was located at the forehead. The EEG
sampling rate was set to 1000 Hz.EEG data were preprocessed using Brain Vision Analyzer software (Brain Vision
Analyzer, BrainProduct, GmbH, Germany). Raw data were down-sampled to 250 Hz and
submitted to a 1–40 Hz band-pass filter. Epochs were removed if the peak signal
amplitude exceeded ±200 μV.
Frequency analysis was performed using the fast Fourier transformation
(FFT) algorithm through a Hamming window. The power spectral density was
computed for two epochs each lasting 4 min based on the markers representing the
initial time-point: pre-acupuncture treatment and post-acupuncture treatment.
The number of artifact was 110.2 ± 152.7 for the Real condition, 52.1 ± 96.1 for
Sync condition, 52.1 ± 60.2 for Async condition. No significant differences in
number of rejected data were found between conditions (F =
2.58, p > 0.05). Based on the power spectrum obtained by
frequency analysis, the power values for each frequency bandwidth were
calculated for delta waves (1–4 Hz), theta waves (4–8 Hz), alpha waves
(8–12 Hz), beta waves (12–25 Hz), and gamma waves (25–40 Hz).The ratio (%) for the power value of each background EEG activity was calculated
using a formula similar to that in a previous study
: delta ratio (%) = power of delta wave/sum of each power value × 100. The
theta ratio (%), alpha ratio (%), beta ratio (%), and gamma ratio (%) were
calculated in a similar manner. Because the brain oscillation patterns were
similar across electrodes, brain oscillations responses were averaged across
electrodes in the present study. Each power ratio was calculated as the power in
each band divided by the total spectral power. We used this ratio formula to
control variability in the EEG absolute power due to individual differences,
such as electrode impedance and scalp thickness.
Statistical analysis
Values are reported as means ± standard deviations. RHI ratings and
deqi ratings under each condition were compared using
paired t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA),
respectively. Pain tolerance and EEG changes under the Real, Sync, and Async
conditions were averaged within the same trials and analyzed using a two-way
repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc tests and with time and condition
as factors. The significance level was set at 0.05 for all analyses. Statistical
analyses were performed using Jamovi Software (version 1.2,
https://www.jamovi.org). We applied Benjamini-Hochberg method to
control the false discovery rate at level alpha. For exploratory data analysis,
Pearson’s correlation analysis was also performed to determine the correlation
between deqi sensation and EEG changes, and pain tolerance
changes.
Results
Perception of the rubber-hand illusion
The paired t-test revealed a significant difference between the
Sync and Async rubber-hand conditions in the self-reported perception of the RHI
main questions (Sync: 2.04 ± 1.01, Async: −0.76 ± 1.62; t =
11.9, p < 0.001) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
RHI questionnaire and deqi sensation ratings under
each condition. (a) Comparison of RHI questionnaires between the
Sync and the Async conditions. Q1. It seemed as if I were feeling
the touch of the paintbrush in the location where I saw the rubber
hand touched. Q2. It seemed as though the touch I felt was caused by
the paintbrush touching the rubber hand. Q3. I felt as if the rubber
hand were my hand. Q4. It felt unpleasant when the brush touched my
hand. Q5. My left hand felt cold. Q6. My left foot felt cold. The
first three questions (Q1–Q3) were the main question and were
designed to correspond to the RHI. The last three items (Q4–Q6) were
control questions. Responses to RHI questionnaire items used a
7-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree (−3)” to
“strongly agree (+3).” Results are reported as means with standard
deviations. A significant difference in responses to the RHI
perception scale was observed between the brush-stroke sessions
under the Sync and Async rubber-hand conditions.
RHI questionnaire and deqi sensation ratings under
each condition. (a) Comparison of RHI questionnaires between the
Sync and the Async conditions. Q1. It seemed as if I were feeling
the touch of the paintbrush in the location where I saw the rubber
hand touched. Q2. It seemed as though the touch I felt was caused by
the paintbrush touching the rubber hand. Q3. I felt as if the rubber
hand were my hand. Q4. It felt unpleasant when the brush touched my
hand. Q5. My left hand felt cold. Q6. My left foot felt cold. The
first three questions (Q1–Q3) were the main question and were
designed to correspond to the RHI. The last three items (Q4–Q6) were
control questions. Responses to RHI questionnaire items used a
7-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree (−3)” to
“strongly agree (+3).” Results are reported as means with standard
deviations. A significant difference in responses to the RHI
perception scale was observed between the brush-stroke sessions
under the Sync and Async rubber-hand conditions.
Perception of deqi sensation
The one-way ANOVA revealed significantly greater deqi sensations
under the Real condition than under the two rubber-hand conditions, and also
revealed prominent deqi sensations under the rubber-hand
conditions (MASS score sums: Real: 26.02 ± 19.42; Sync: 12.27 ± 15.11; Async:
9.48 ± 14.08, F = 9.906, p < 0.001; Figure 3(a)). Both the Sync and Async
rubber hand condition exhibited noticeable experiences of the
deqi sensation (One sample t-test, Sync:
t = 5.13, p < 0.001, Async:
t = 4.26, p < 0.001). However, the
paired t-tests showed no significant differences in
deqi sensations when the Sync and Async rubber-hand
conditions were compared. Each MASS questionnaire under three different
conditions is represented by heat map (Figure 3(b)).
Figure 3.
(a) Comparison of deqi sensation ratings using the
MASS questionnaire. Some deqi sensations were also
observed under the rubber-hand conditions. The overall
deqi sensation score under the Sync condition
was slightly higher than that under the Async condition, but the
difference was not significant (p = 0.395). (b)
Each MASS questionnaire under three different conditions is
represented by heat map. Asterisks indicate significant comparison
level (*** p < 0.001, ** p <
0.01, * p < 0.05).
(a) Comparison of deqi sensation ratings using the
MASS questionnaire. Some deqi sensations were also
observed under the rubber-hand conditions. The overall
deqi sensation score under the Sync condition
was slightly higher than that under the Async condition, but the
difference was not significant (p = 0.395). (b)
Each MASS questionnaire under three different conditions is
represented by heat map. Asterisks indicate significant comparison
level (*** p < 0.001, ** p <
0.01, * p < 0.05).
Changes in pain tolerance
The repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (F = 51.00,
p < 0.001). However, no significant effect was observed
for condition (F = 0.419, p = 0.659) and no time × condition
interaction was found (F = 1.48, p = 0.232) (Figure 4). Results of the
paired t-test revealed that the pain tolerance was
significantly increased after acupuncture stimulation under the real-hand
condition (Real: pre-acupuncture (pre): 8.75 ± 2.40, post-acupuncture (post):
10.67 ± 4.26, t = −4.04, p < 0.001,
Benjamini-Hochberg (B-H) corrected). Similarly, results of the paired
t-test indicated that the pain tolerance was significantly
increased after acupuncture stimulation under both the Sync and Async conditions
(Sync: pre: 9.57 ± 3.52, post: 10.71 ± 4.18, t = −3.39,
p < 0.01, B-H corrected; Async: pre: 9.37 ± 2.86, post:
11.45 ± 4.39, t = −4.91, p < 0.001, B-H
corrected).
Figure 4.
Changes in pain tolerance after acupuncture treatment among the three
conditions. After the acupuncture session, the pain tolerance
significantly increased in all three conditions. However, no
significant time × condition interaction effect and no effect of
condition was observed. Error bars indicate standard deviations of
the mean; pre: pre-acupuncture; post: post-acupuncture.
Changes in pain tolerance after acupuncture treatment among the three
conditions. After the acupuncture session, the pain tolerance
significantly increased in all three conditions. However, no
significant time × condition interaction effect and no effect of
condition was observed. Error bars indicate standard deviations of
the mean; pre: pre-acupuncture; post: post-acupuncture.There were no significant differences of increased pain tolerance between visit
two and visit three in the Sync condition (0.73 ± 1.19 vs 1.53 ± 2.72,
t = 1.200, p > 0.05) and in the Async
condition (1.75 ± 3.09 vs 2.44 ± 2.20, t = 0.859,
p > 0.05). There were no significant differences of
increased pain tolerance between their visit order (day 2 or day 3) in the Sync
and the Async condition.
Changes in electroencephalography power
Increased delta and decreased theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves were observed
after acupuncture treatment under all three conditions (Table 1; Figure 5). For all conditions, the delta
wave ratio increased significantly after the acupuncture stimulation. The
repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of time (F = 220.867,
p < 0.001), but no effect of condition (F = 1.34,
p = 0.266) or time × condition interaction was found (F =
0.181, p = 0.835).
Table 1.
Changes in EEG power.
Real
Sync
Async
ANOVA
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
Pre
Post
Time
Condition
Time × condition
Delta
73.20 ± 7.90
81.79 ± 5.41
74.90 ± 8.90
84.25 ± 5.01
74.13 ± 8.76
84.11 ± 5.27
<0.001
0.266
0.835
Theta
12.14 ± 2.67
10.00 ± 2.23
11.67 ± 2.95
8.80 ± 1.70
12.04 ± 4.32
9.02 ± 2.59
<0.001
0.330
0.337
Alpha
9.64 ± 4.33
5.36 ± 2.48
9.67 ± 6.28
4.79 ± 2.94
9.40 ± 5.08
4.78 ± 2.77
<0.001
0.888
0.755
Beta
4.22 ± 4.00
2.41 ± 1.24
3.32 ± 1.55
1.85 ± 1.16
3.36 ± 1.65
1.80 ± 0.92
<0.001
0.060
0.835
Gamma
0.80 ± 1.44
0.44 ± 0.31
0.44 ± 0.20
0.29 ± 0.20
0.47 ± 0.25
0.29 ± 0.18
<0.01
0.033
0.471
Data are reported as power value of EEG activity: percentage (%);
pre: pre-acupuncture; post: post-acupuncture.
Figure 5.
Changes in electroencephalography power. Increased delta and
decreased theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves were observed after
acupuncture treatment under all three conditions. The power in each
band divided by the overall spectral power was used to compute each
power ratio. The brain oscillation patterns in response to
acupuncture stimulations were demonstrated across electrodes. The
changes in EEG power of each electrodes were visualized using Orange
Software (version 3.28.0, https://orangedatamining.com).
Changes in EEG power.Data are reported as power value of EEG activity: percentage (%);
pre: pre-acupuncture; post: post-acupuncture.Changes in electroencephalography power. Increased delta and
decreased theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves were observed after
acupuncture treatment under all three conditions. The power in each
band divided by the overall spectral power was used to compute each
power ratio. The brain oscillation patterns in response to
acupuncture stimulations were demonstrated across electrodes. The
changes in EEG power of each electrodes were visualized using Orange
Software (version 3.28.0, https://orangedatamining.com).Under all conditions, the theta ratio decreased significantly after the
acupuncture stimulation. The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant
effect of time (F = 105.58, p < 0.001), but no effect of
condition (F = 1.12, p = 0.330) or time × condition interaction
was found (F = 1.10, p = 0.337).For all conditions, the alpha ratio decreased significantly after the acupuncture
stimulation. The repeated-measures ANOVA again revealed a significant time
effect (F = 198.7, p < 0.001), but no effect of condition (F
= 0.119, p = 0.888) or time × condition interaction was found
(F = 0.282, p = 0.755).Under all conditions, the beta ratio decreased significantly after the
acupuncture stimulation. The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant
effect of time (F = 43.586, p < 0.001), but no effect of
condition (F = 2.89, p = 0.06) or time × condition interaction
was found (F = 0.180, p = 0.835).Under all conditions, the gamma ratio decreased significantly after the
acupuncture stimulation. The repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant
effects of time (F = 9.087, p = 0.003) and condition (F = 3.50,
p = 0.033), but no significant time × condition interaction
(F = 0.758, p = 0.471).
Correlation between deqi sensations and pain
tolerance
We found a significant positive correlation between deqi
sensations and changes in the pain tolerance under the Sync condition
(heaviness: r = 0.358, p = 0.023; tingling:
r = 0.428, p = 0.006; numbness:
r = 0.404, p = 0.01; warmth:
r = 0.342, p = 0.031), but not under the
Async condition.
Correlation between electroencephalography power and pain tolerance
A significant positive correlation between changes in delta power and changes in
pain tolerance was observed only under the Real condition (r =
0.336, p = 0.036). Similarly, a significant negative
correlation between changes in beta power and changes in pain tolerance was
observed only under the Real condition (r = 0.351,
p = 0.028). Except for these associations of changes in
delta and beta power with changes in pain tolerance under the Real condition,
EEG power changes were not correlated with changes in pain tolerance.
Discussion
We investigated the effects of three components of acupuncture stimulation (visual,
tactile, and body ownership) on acupuncture analgesia using an RHI paradigm. We
demonstrated that the pain tolerance was increased after acupuncture treatment
applied to the real hand or to the rubber hand. Among the visual, tactile, and body
ownership components, expectation of acupuncture treatment sparked by visual
information of receiving acupuncture treatment was the predominant factor in
acupuncture analgesia. Deqi sensations were a contributing factor
to acupuncture analgesia when the rubber hand was incorporated with participants’
own bodies. Brain oscillation patterns in response to acupuncture treatment were
similar regardless of the condition.In the current study, we demonstrated that acupuncture treatment increased the pain
tolerance under all three conditions, i.e. the Real, Sync, and Async conditions. We
dissociated the body ownership component from the visual component by comparing the
Sync and Async conditions. Increases in experimentally induced heat threshold by
acupuncture treatment under both the Sync and Async conditions were similar to that
under the Real condition. These findings are consistent with those of previous
studies in which the expectation of acupuncture treatment was the one of important
factors in acupuncture analgesia.[2,4,6,7] In these previous studies,
participants were instructed to focus on videos and imagine themselves being
treated, and the findings highlight the importance of credibility in the context of
acupuncture treatment. In our experiment, we did not directly induce credibility,
but we instructed participants to focus on the rubber hand and acupuncture
stimulation. Interviews with participants indicated that this procedure may have
influenced participants, facilitating credibility in the acupuncture treatment
context.In our study, we fixed the order of the acupuncture stimulation, scheduling the Real
condition on the first day to provide everyone with a similar experience of
acupuncture. The fixed-order experimental design might produce expectations of a
therapeutic context, resulting in the analgesic effects of the rubber-hand
conditions, even the Async condition. Recent studies suggest that prior information
about the context can influence pain perception,
and pain perception can be predicted based on Bayesian modeling from prior
experiences and expectations.
Even when patients receive placebo without deception, their body might
respond via unconscious prediction induced by the embodied assumption of medication taking.
Given that needling on either the real hand or the rubber hand is
administered in the context of medical intervention, brain might minimize prediction
error and tend to perceive the needling on the rubber hand as acupuncture treatment
on their own hand. In the current study, participants experienced
deqi sensations in response to acupuncture stimulation under
either the Sync or the Async condition. Since all participants had experienced
analgesic effects of acupuncture in the Real condition on the first day, it is
assumed that visual stimuli induced expectations of a therapeutic context might
result in analgesic effects in both Sync and Async condition. It suggests that a
therapeutic context is crucial in producing analgesic effect of acupuncture with
visual component only. Further study will be necessary to investigate the
interaction of prior knowledge and visual component of acupuncture in the
future.Accumulating evidence shows that looking at ones’ own body reduces pain experience.
When looking at their stimulated right hand, painful stimuli applied to that hand
were less painful compared to when looking at other objects.[32,33] Mohan et al.,
showed no changes in pain perception delivered on the real hand during the rubber
hand illusion than control condition.
In contrast, other studies showed that looking at the incorporated rubber
hand led to an increase in pain threshold and reduced discomfort caused by cold
stimuli.[34-37] Looking at a virtual body can increase pain threshold similar
to looking at one’s real body.[14,38] The majority of studies
suggest that analgesic effect can be transferable via the visual information of the
rubber hand when the hand is incorporated into one’s own body image.
Looking at the body part, pain stimuli applied to that hand might be rated as
being less painful. Therefore, in the current study, after body ownership was
manipulated in one hand (i.e. left hand), we measured the changes of the pain
tolerance of another hand (i.e. right hand), which was out of sight. This procedure
might minimize the analgesic effect of seeing their own body and investigate the
role of three components of acupuncture stimulation in acupuncture analgesia using
the RHI paradigm.In the present study, we observed noticeable experience of the deqi
sensations in response to acupuncture stimulation under both the Sync and Async
conditions. In contrast, deqi sensations such as heaviness,
tingling, numbness, and warmth were significantly correlated with acupuncture
analgesia only under the Sync condition. These findings suggest that
deqi sensations might have been an important factor in
acupuncture analgesia when the rubber hand was incorporated with participants’ own
bodies. Kong et al. found significant correlations of acupuncture analgesia with
deqi ratings of numbness and soreness.
Also, in a study of primary dysmenorrhea, deqi sensations
were considered a major indicator of the analgesic effect of acupuncture.
Furthermore, activation of the insula, a key region in the brain’s
interoceptive system, was correlated with deqi sensations when the
rubber hand was incorporated with participants’ own bodies.
Taken together, these findings suggest that deqi sensations
might be involved pain reduction induced by the body ownership component of
acupuncture under the synchronized rubber-hand condition. Further study will address
how deqi sensations mediate acupuncture analgesia and how the
mediation effects vary across different body ownership conditions.Changes in brain oscillation may be an important component of the neurophysiological
mechanisms behind acupuncture analgesia. Quantitative EEG analysis revealed that
brain oscillations in the delta and alpha bands increased under acupuncture treatment.
Previous work has shown that mu rhythm power was increased after acupuncture
stimulation of the ST36 acupoint compared to control acupoints.
Significant changes in the alpha band were found when subjects reported
greater deqi sensations after acupuncture stimulation of the forearm.
Phase coherence in the theta and alpha bands tended to increase after
acupuncture stimulation accompanied by deqi sensations.
In the current study, no significant differences were found in EEG changes
between the Real condition and the rubber-hand conditions. Under all three
conditions, delta waves increased while theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves
decreased after acupuncture stimulation, which could be attributed to a relaxation
state following acupuncture stimulation. It is well known that increases in slow EEG
waves are related to a stable, near-sleeping state, whereas increases in faster EEG
waves are associated with higher levels of thought, attention, or tension.
As previously reported, relaxation and vigilance after acupuncture treatment
were associated with autonomic nervous system and brain oscillation patterns.
Furthermore, a pain-induced gamma wave was significantly reduced after
acupuncture treatment.
Taken together, these findings indicate that enhanced slow waves and
decreased fast waves following acupuncture treatment might be derived from
relaxation states due to the expectation of acupuncture treatment. Notably, the
present study demonstrated that enhanced delta and reduced beta waves in response to
acupuncture treatment were correlated with acupuncture analgesia only in the
real-hand condition, not in the rubber-hand conditions. Changes in delta and beta
waves were more closely associated with acupuncture analgesia in participants’ own
bodies. Further study will be necessary to identify different mechanisms underlying
these three components of acupuncture analgesia.Notably, we compared pain reduction from acupuncture treatment using a RHI paradigm
to separate multisensory elements of acupuncture treatment and clarified the roles
of three components of acupuncture analgesia. Under the real-hand condition,
acupuncture treatment can induce pain reduction by visual, tactile, and body
ownership components. Under the rubber-hand conditions, acupuncture analgesia was
induced by visual and body ownership elements under the synchronized condition,
whereas it was only induced by the visual component under the asynchronized
condition. Interestingly, deqi sensations were noticeable in both
the Sync and Async conditions. Independent of body ownership, visual information can
generate a therapeutic context and successfully induce deqi
sensations even under an asynchronized condition. Our results support previous
findings indicating that top-down components of acupuncture treatment should be
considered to understand the neural mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia.Acupuncture treatment involves somatosensory components as well as cognitive
components, including attention, expectations of treatment, and medical context.
Not only bottom-up components of needling but also top-down components of
acupuncture can contribute to acupuncture analgesia. The acupuncture stimulations on
the rubber hand in the current study are expected to boost the placebo effect by
inducing visual expectation, which would ultimately result in acupuncture analgesia.
In the current study, we discovered that the visual anticipation plays a significant
influence in acupuncture analgesia. When a body part is the focus of attention,
sensory signals may “burst out” and become conscious, which would cause them to be
regarded as novel sensations.[49,50] Through descending modulatory
activities, attention reveals a tingling sensation by opening the door for repressed
or ectopic sensory information.
Perceptual experiences arise from higher cognitive processes independently of
sensory stimuli.
For instance, a rubber hand can elicit tingling feelings.
Furthermore, participants have similar experiences to real laser acupuncture
even with fake laser acupuncture, which delivers no physical stimulus.
In our earlier study, participants who were exposed to the expectation of
cutaneous electrical stimulation experienced more deqi sensation.
These results were linked to the brain’s salience network, which plays a
predictive role.
According to the predictive coding paradigm, the perception is generated
using a hierarchical system that evaluates ascending and descending information
(prior expectations), with the goal of minimizing the discrepancy between predicted
and incoming signals.
Descending brain modulation works together to produce sensory sensations from
acupuncture stimulation in addition to simple needling.
Therefore, it is assumed that higher cognitive processes, such as attention
and visual expectancies, contribute considerably to the generation of
deqi experience and acupuncture analgesia in both the Sync and
Async situations of the current experiments.This study had several limitations. First, we did not include a no-treatment control
group without the rubber-hand illusion. Therefore, we cannot fully exclude the
effects of habituation or sensitization on the pain tolerance in this study. The
pain tolerance was not significantly increased between the pre-treatment and
post-treatment in no treatment control in our previous study (8.33 ± 2.02 vs 8.83 ±
2.57, t = 1.62, p > 0.05), indicating that
there might be no habituation or sensitization on the pain tolerance in this study.
However, we cannot fully exclude other psychosocial factors or other
components such as the therapeutic alliance between practitioner and the patients.
Second, participants completed the Real condition first in a fixed order.
Thus, all participants received the same acupuncture stimulation to their hands and
experienced similar acupuncture analgesia. This might have minimized the confounding
effects of acupuncture experience. However, we randomized the Sync and the Async
conditions and can therefore exclude the order effect of body ownership in this
experiment. And we observed no significant differences of increased pain tolerance
between their visit order (day 2 or day 3) in the Sync and the Async conditions.
Lastly, the washout period might be crucial for the evaluation of pain threshold.
The experiments were carried out over three separate days. The interval between each
experiment was at least 2 days. Pretreatment pain thresholds for the three
treatments did not differ substantially according to an ANOVA test (Real: 8.75 ±
0.38, Sync: 9.57 ± 0.56, Async: 9.37 ± 0.46, F = 0.939, p = 0.396).
We can therefore infer that the current study’s within-subjects cross-over design
can guarantee a sufficient washout duration for determining the experimental pain
threshold.In conclusion, we clarified the components of acupuncture stimulation in acupuncture
analgesia through a multisensory integration paradigm. Expectation of acupuncture
treatment sparked by visual information of receiving acupuncture treatment was the
one of important factors in acupuncture analgesia in our study. This study is a
first step toward separating various components of acupuncture analgesia and
utilizing those components to maximize the analgesic effect.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material for The role of visual expectations in acupuncture
analgesia: A quantitative electroencephalography study by Dha-Hyun Choi,
Seoyoung Lee, In-Seon Lee and Younbyoung Chae in Molecular Pain
Authors: Matthew R Longo; Gian Domenico Iannetti; Flavia Mancini; Jon Driver; Patrick Haggard Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 6.167