Runze Yang1, A Max Hamilton2,1, Hongfu Sun2,1,3, Khalil S Rawji2,1, Susobhan Sarkar2,1, Reza Mirzaei2,1, G Bruce Pike4,2,1, V Wee Yong2,1,5, Jeff F Dunn6,7,8. 1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 2. Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 3. School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. 4. Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, N.W. Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada. 5. Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Canada. 6. Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, N.W. Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada. dunnj@ucalgary.ca. 7. Cumming School of Medicine, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. dunnj@ucalgary.ca. 8. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. dunnj@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in glioblastoma (GBM) disease progression has received increasing attention. Recent advances have shown that TAMs can be re-programmed to exert a pro-inflammatory, anti-tumor effect to control GBMs. However, imaging methods capable of differentiating tumor progression from immunotherapy treatment effects have been lacking, making timely assessment of treatment response difficult. We showed that tracking monocytes using iron oxide nanoparticle (USPIO) with MRI can be a sensitive imaging method to detect therapy response directed at the innate immune system. METHODS: We implanted syngeneic mouse glioma stem cells into C57/BL6 mice and treated the animals with either niacin (a stimulator of innate immunity) or vehicle. Animals were imaged using an anatomical MRI sequence, R2* mapping, and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) before and after USPIO injection. RESULTS: Compared to vehicles, niacin-treated animals showed significantly higher susceptibility and R2*, representing USPIO and monocyte infiltration into the tumor. We observed a significant reduction in tumor size in the niacin-treated group 7 days later. We validated our MRI results with flow cytometry and immunofluoresence, which showed that niacin decreased pro-inflammatory Ly6C high monocytes in the blood but increased CD16/32 pro-inflammatory macrophages within the tumor, consistent with migration of these pro-inflammatory innate immune cells from the blood to the tumor. CONCLUSION: MRI with USPIO injection can detect therapeutic responses of innate immune stimulating agents before changes in tumor size have occurred, providing a potential complementary imaging technique to monitor cancer immunotherapies. MANUSCRIPT HIGHLIGHT: We show that iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIOs) can be used to label innate immune cells and detect the trafficking of pro-inflammatory monocytes into the glioblastoma. This preceded changes in tumor size, making it a more sensitive imaging technique.
BACKGROUND: The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in glioblastoma (GBM) disease progression has received increasing attention. Recent advances have shown that TAMs can be re-programmed to exert a pro-inflammatory, anti-tumor effect to control GBMs. However, imaging methods capable of differentiating tumor progression from immunotherapy treatment effects have been lacking, making timely assessment of treatment response difficult. We showed that tracking monocytes using iron oxide nanoparticle (USPIO) with MRI can be a sensitive imaging method to detect therapy response directed at the innate immune system. METHODS: We implanted syngeneic mouse glioma stem cells into C57/BL6 mice and treated the animals with either niacin (a stimulator of innate immunity) or vehicle. Animals were imaged using an anatomical MRI sequence, R2* mapping, and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) before and after USPIO injection. RESULTS: Compared to vehicles, niacin-treated animals showed significantly higher susceptibility and R2*, representing USPIO and monocyte infiltration into the tumor. We observed a significant reduction in tumor size in the niacin-treated group 7 days later. We validated our MRI results with flow cytometry and immunofluoresence, which showed that niacin decreased pro-inflammatory Ly6C high monocytes in the blood but increased CD16/32 pro-inflammatory macrophages within the tumor, consistent with migration of these pro-inflammatory innate immune cells from the blood to the tumor. CONCLUSION: MRI with USPIO injection can detect therapeutic responses of innate immune stimulating agents before changes in tumor size have occurred, providing a potential complementary imaging technique to monitor cancer immunotherapies. MANUSCRIPT HIGHLIGHT: We show that iron oxide nanoparticles (USPIOs) can be used to label innate immune cells and detect the trafficking of pro-inflammatory monocytes into the glioblastoma. This preceded changes in tumor size, making it a more sensitive imaging technique.
Authors: James Larkin; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Jean-Jacques Grob; Piotr Rutkowski; Christopher D Lao; C Lance Cowey; Dirk Schadendorf; John Wagstaff; Reinhard Dummer; Pier F Ferrucci; Michael Smylie; David Hogg; Andrew Hill; Ivan Márquez-Rodas; John Haanen; Massimo Guidoboni; Michele Maio; Patrick Schöffski; Matteo S Carlino; Céleste Lebbé; Grant McArthur; Paolo A Ascierto; Gregory A Daniels; Georgina V Long; Lars Bastholt; Jasmine I Rizzo; Agnes Balogh; Andriy Moshyk; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip W Kantoff; Celestia S Higano; Neal D Shore; E Roy Berger; Eric J Small; David F Penson; Charles H Redfern; Anna C Ferrari; Robert Dreicer; Robert B Sims; Yi Xu; Mark W Frohlich; Paul F Schellhammer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tony S K Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Iveta Kudaba; Dariusz M Kowalski; Byoung Chul Cho; Hande Z Turna; Gilberto Castro; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Konstantin K Laktionov; Igor Bondarenko; Kaoru Kubota; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Jin Zhang; Debra Kush; Gilberto Lopes Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matthew D Hellmann; Luis Paz-Ares; Reyes Bernabe Caro; Bogdan Zurawski; Sang-We Kim; Enric Carcereny Costa; Keunchil Park; Aurelia Alexandru; Lorena Lupinacci; Emmanuel de la Mora Jimenez; Hiroshi Sakai; Istvan Albert; Alain Vergnenegre; Solange Peters; Konstantinos Syrigos; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Reck; Hossein Borghaei; Julie R Brahmer; Kenneth J O'Byrne; William J Geese; Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran; Sridhar K Rabindran; Ravi S Kasinathan; Faith E Nathan; Suresh S Ramalingam Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tiffany R Hodges; Martina Ott; Joanne Xiu; Zoran Gatalica; Jeff Swensen; Shouhao Zhou; Jason T Huse; John de Groot; Shulin Li; Willem W Overwijk; David Spetzler; Amy B Heimberger Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Pieter Wesseling; Daniel J Brat; Ian A Cree; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Cynthia Hawkins; H K Ng; Stefan M Pfister; Guido Reifenberger; Riccardo Soffietti; Andreas von Deimling; David W Ellison Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 13.029