| Literature DB >> 36193166 |
Y Izawa1, H Murakami1, T Shirakawa1, M Nishida2, K Futamura2, Y Kobayashi3, Y Tsuchida2.
Abstract
Fix and flap surgery for severe open limb fractures is already a standard treatment. In cases where the fracture is complicated or accompanied by bone defects, secondary surgery is required for fracture sites covered with a myocutaneous flap after the soft tissue condition has stabilized. We applied the delayed procedure concept used for distant flaps and attempted to prevent postoperative myocutaneous flap necrosis by performing a provisional incision prior to the longitudinal incision of the flap. We report the course of five cases of the longitudinal division of the myocutaneous flap using "provisional incision" after free-flap surgery for severe open fracture and verify its usefulness. In this case series, five patients with severe open limb fractures treated from 2020 to 2021 who underwent longitudinal incision of the myocutaneous flap using provisional incision after free-flap surgery were included. The types of flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction in the acute phase, the reasons for the need for secondary surgery, the period from soft tissue reconstruction to additional surgery, and the healing status of soft tissue after secondary surgery were all investigated retrospectively. The types of flaps used for soft tissue reconstruction were latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in four cases and anterolateral thigh flap in one case. The breakdown of secondary surgery was osteosynthesis in one case, plate removal in one case, and bone cement removal and autologous bone grafting in three cases. The period from soft tissue reconstruction to secondary surgery ranged from 6 weeks to 4 months. In all cases, the wound healed without necrosis of the myocutaneous flap. For the treatment of severe open limb fractures, longitudinal division of the myocutaneous flap using "provisional incision" is a safer approach to the necessary secondary surgery and reduces the possibility of necrosis of the flap.Entities:
Keywords: Flap necrosis; Free-flap surgery; Open fracture; Provisional incision
Year: 2022 PMID: 36193166 PMCID: PMC9526011 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JPRAS Open ISSN: 2352-5878
Fig. 1The case presentation of flap necrosis of the distal half after longitudinal division of the muscle flap.
a. Seven months after surgery of lateral gastrocnemius muscle flap.
b. The muscle flap was longitudinally divided, and additional osteosynthesis was performed on the lateral side of the proximal tibia.
c. The distal half of the muscle flap was necrotic after surgery.
Fig. 2Schematic representation of the provisional incision after surgery of the free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. As provisional incision, myocutaneous flap is devided longitudinally to the bone at once without deep peeling, and the wound is sutured roughly. About one week later, deep peeling and the necessary operation are performed from the same incision.
Demographic data, type of the surgery at acute phase, timing, and breakdown of the secondary surgery.
| Case | Age | Sex | Injury | Surgery at acute phase | Period from flap surgery to secondary surgery | Secondary surgery | Wound healing after second surgery | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| osteosynthesis | Flap | |||||||
| 1 | 33 | Male | Open wrist fracture | Wrist: plating | LD | 6 weeks | Remove plate | No necrosis |
| 2 | 19 | Female | Open lower leg fracture | Tibia: plating | LD | 3 months | Plating | No necrosis |
| 3 | 44 | Male | Open lower leg fracture | Tibia: plating | LD | 3 months | Remove cement | No necrosis |
| 4 | 86 | Female | Pilon fracture | Tibia: plating | LD | 3 months | Remove cement | No necrosis |
| 5 | 49 | Male | Open foot fracture | 1st metatarsal: plating | ALT | 4 months | Remove cement | No necrosis |
G-A: Gustilo-Anderson classification.
LD: Free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap.
ALT: Free anterolateral thigh flap.
Fig. 3Treatment course of case 1. a. Appearance before secondary surgery. b. X-ray before secondary surgery. c. Appearance after provisional incision. d. Appearance after rough suture. e. X-ray after secondary surgery. f. Appearance after wound healing.
Fig. 4Treatment course of case 2. a. Appearance before secondary surgery. b. X-ray before secondary surgery. c. Appearance after provisional incision. d. Appearance after rough suture. e. X-ray after secondary surgery. f. Appearance after wound healing.