| Literature DB >> 36193155 |
Yanfang He1, Jie He1, Xueyuan Hou1.
Abstract
Objective: This study mainly discusses the influence of the continuous nursing intervention on the treatment compliance of patients with depression.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36193155 PMCID: PMC9525770 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7080678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
The baseline data of the conventional group and the continuous group.
| Group | Conventional group ( | Continuous group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.052 | 0.820 | ||
| Male | 29 (60.42) | 42 (58.33) | ||
| Female | 19 (39.58) | 30 (41.67) | ||
| Age ( | 45.26 ± 6.13 | 46.17 ± 5.58 | 0.841 | 0.402 |
| Course of disease ( | 1.52 ± 0.43 | 1.48 ± 0.55 | 0.425 | 0.672 |
| Educational level ( | 9.13 ± 2.52 | 9.58 ± 2.15 | 1.048 | 0.297 |
|
| ||||
|
| 1.182 | 0.554 | ||
| Noncompliance | 9 (18.75) | 9 (12.50) | ||
| Partial compliance | 17 (35.42) | 31 (43.06) | ||
| Full compliance | 22 (45.83) | 32 (44.44) | ||
|
| ||||
|
| 4.018 | 0.134 | ||
| Mild depression | 24 (50.00) | 46 (63.89) | ||
| Moderate depression | 18 (37.50) | 15 (20.83) | ||
| Severe depression | 6 (12.50) | 11 (15.28) | ||
Figure 1The steps of this study.
Comparison of treatment compliance [n(%)].
| Group | Noncompliance | Partial compliance | Full compliance | Treatment compliance rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional group( | 9(18.75) | 13(27.08) | 26(54.17) | 39(81.25) |
| Continuous group( | 0(0.00) | 7(9.72) | 65(90.28) | 72(100.00) |
|
| ||||
|
| 23.947 | 17.605 | ||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Comparison of depression degree [n(%)].
| Group | No depression | Mild depression | Moderate depression | Severe depression |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional group ( | 18(37.50) | 14(29.17) | 13(27.08) | 3(6.25) |
| Continuous group ( | 34(47.22) | 30(41.67) | 8(11.11) | 0(0.00) |
|
| ||||
|
| 9.845 | |||
|
| 0.013 | |||
Comparison of QOL-BREF (, point).
| Group | Physiological function | Psychological function | Social function | Environmental adaptability | Total quality of life |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional group ( | 2.26 ± 0.29 | 2.03 ± 0.19 | 3.35 ± 0.38 | 3.10 ± 0.41 | 11.24 ± 2.21 |
| Continuous group ( | 5.17 ± 0.62 | 3.96 ± 0.52 | 5.71 ± 0.52 | 5.33 ± 0.76 | 23.55 ± 3.26 |
|
| 30.350 | 24.610 | 26.990 | 18.590 | 22.880 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Comparison of nursing satisfaction [n(%)].
| Group | Dissatisfaction | General satisfaction | Satisfaction | Great satisfaction | Degree of satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional group ( | 6(12.50) | 11(22.92) | 17(35.42) | 14(29.17) | 31(64.58) |
| Continuous group ( | 0(0.00) | 4(5.56) | 12(16.67) | 56(77.78) | 68(94.44) |
|
| |||||
|
| 15.779 | 32.002 | |||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
Comparison of ITAQ (, point).
| Time | Conventional group ( | Continuous group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At discharge | 15.36 ± 4.16 | 15.41 ± 3.38 | 0.072 | 0.942 |
| 6 months after discharge | 10.83 ± 4.58 | 14.89 ± 5.22 | 4.380 | <0.001 |
| 12 months after discharge | 9.15 ± 3.72 | 13.62 ± 4.26 | 5.918 | <0.001 |