| Literature DB >> 36192720 |
Zixiang Ye1, Enmin Xie2, Yanxiang Gao3, Peizhao Li1, Yimin Tu2, Ziyu Guo1, Qing Li1, Yaxin Wu1, Xiaozhai Yu2, Yike Li2, Changan Yu3, Jingang Zheng4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association between triglyceride glucose index and cardiovascular disease (CVD) development in the Chinese middle-aged and elderly population using the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study dataset 2011-2018.Entities:
Keywords: Adults; Cardiovascular disease; Chinese; Insulin resistance; Triglyceride glucose index
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36192720 PMCID: PMC9531496 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01157-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 3.263
Fig. 1Flowchart of the procedure extracting the patients from CHARLS. *Missing data includes age, sex, FBG, TG, CVD, creatinine condition
The baseline characteristics of participants classified by CVD
| Total | Non-CVD | CVD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6114 | 5361 | 753 | ||
| 8.66 (0.65) | 8.65 (0.64) | 8.71 (0.72) | 0.023 | |
| T1 | 2038 (33.3) | 1799 (33.6) | 239 (31.7) | 0.028 |
| T2 | 2038 (33.3) | 1807 (33.7) | 231 (30.7) | |
| T3 | 2038 (33.3) | 1755 (32.7) | 283 (37.6) | |
| 0.202 | ||||
| Low | 2876 (47.0) | 2521(47) | 355(47.1) | |
| Median | 3081 (50.4) | 2706(50.5) | 375(49.8) | |
| High | 157 (2.6) | 134(2.5) | 23(3.0) | |
| 57.87 (8.98) | 57.94 (9.05) | 57.41 (8.51) | 0.133 | |
| 2776 (45.4) | 2399 (44.7) | 377 (50.1) | 0.007 | |
| 23.67 (4.98) | 23.60 (4.92) | 24.17 (5.38) | 0.003 | |
| 15.66 (4.37) | 15.67 (4.40) | 15.63 (4.21) | 0.81 | |
| 108.72 (33.12) | 108.29 (31.91) | 111.77 (40.66) | 0.007 | |
| 0.77 (0.18) | 0.77 (0.18) | 0.78 (0.18) | 0.147 | |
| 193.22 (37.80) | 193.30 (37.80) | 192.64 (37.82) | 0.658 | |
| 129.55 (95.12) | 128.65 (93.86) | 136.00 (103.52) | 0.047 | |
| 51.61 (15.25) | 51.70 (15.21) | 51.00 (15.57) | 0.241 | |
| 116.17 (34.35) | 116.35 (34.24) | 114.90 (35.11) | 0.279 | |
| 2.44 (6.67) | 2.43 (6.80) | 2.47 (5.68) | 0.893 | |
| 4.39 (1.21) | 4.37 (1.21) | 4.49 (1.25) | 0.016 | |
| 1125 (18.4) | 894 (16.7) | 231 (30.7) | < 0.001 | |
| 393 (6.4) | 305 (5.7) | 88 (11.7) | < 0.001 | |
| 172 (2.8) | 139 (2.6) | 33 (4.4) | 0.008 | |
| 2324 (38.0) | 2044 (38.1) | 280 (37.2) | 0.646 | |
| 1927 (31.5) | 1703 (31.8) | 224 (29.7) | 0.283 | |
Fig. 2The logistic regression analysis showed the multivariable OR for CVD decreased in the T2 group and increased in the T3 group compared with the T1 group
The association between various TyG index groups and CVD
| TyG index | Model1 | Model2 | Model3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ref. | ref. | ref. | |
| 0.962(0.794–1.166) | 0.978(0.807–1.186) | 0.985(0.811–1.198) | |
| 1.214(1.009–1.459) | 1.243(1.033–1.495) | 1.288(1.068–1.555) | |
| 0.029 | 0.018 | 0.006 | |
| Model2 | adjusted for age, gender | ||
| Model3 | adjusted for age, gender, BMI, education, smoking, drinking, LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, uric acid, BUN, history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, CKD | ||
Fig. 3The multivariable restricted cubic spline regression result exhibited the J-shape relationship between TyG index and the new-onset CVD incidence after adjusted for age, sex, BMI, education level, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, uric acid, BUN, history of hypertension, dyslipidemia and CKD, smoking, drinking. The cut-off values were 8.07 and 8.57 respectively
The subgroup analysis result of multivariable-adjusted OR for association between TyG index and CVD
| Case | Total | T1 | T2 | T3 | P for trend | P for interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 147 | 1355 | ref. | 1.318(0.858–2.023) | 1.444(0.924–2.257) | 0.045 | 0.165 |
| | 605 | 4152 | ref. | 0.909(0.729–1.132) | 1.235(1.004–1.521) | 0.013 | |
| | 377 | 2776 | ref. | 0.898(0.681–1.184) | 1.431(1.097–1.867) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| | 376 | 3338 | ref. | 1.079(0.816–1.426) | 1.192(0.910–1.562) | 0.033 | |
| | 355 | 2687 | ref. | 0.977(0.732–1.304) | 1.352(1.027–1.782) | 0.032 | 0.570 |
| | 398 | 3427 | ref. | 0.988(0.757–1.288) | 1.230(0.951–1.592) | 0.168 | |
| | |||||||
| | 419 | 3458 | ref. | 1.062(0.780–1.447) | 1.499(1.131–1.989) | 0.002 | 0.020 |
| | 334 | 2656 | ref. | 0.982(0.757–1.276) | 1.182(0.850–1.642) | 0.541 | |
| | 429 | 3234 | ref. | 1.983(0.440–3.526) | 2.267(0.505–4.029) | 0.291 | 0.017 |
| | 323 | 2880 | ref. | 0.795(0.604–1.046) | 1.645(0.781–3.466) | 0.088 | |
Fig. 4The subgroup analysis for association between TyG index and CV classified by age (A), gender (B), BMI (C), FBG (D) and TG (E)