| Literature DB >> 36192676 |
Jun Liu1, Mengyao Zeng2,3, Liu Yang1, Yanyan Mao2, Yang He1, Min Li2, Qing Chen1,4, Weijin Zhou1,2, Liang Chen5, Qianxi Zhu6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reproductive tract infection has become a major public health issue all over the world for its high and growing prevalence. It can cause adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women and their foetuses. This study aimed to investigate the trends and risk factors of the prevalence of reproductive tract infections among women who prepared to conceive in the Chongqing Municipality (China) from 2012 to 2016.Entities:
Keywords: Endogenous infections; Epidemiology; Prevalence; Reproductive tract infections; Risk factors; Sexually transmitted infections; Trend
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36192676 PMCID: PMC9531418 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01502-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.355
Fig. 1Flowchart of study population
Prevalence of reproductive tract infections (RTIs) by sociodemographic characteristics among women of childbearing age in Chongqing, China
| Characteristic | Total | RTIs present | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | Prevalence (%) | ||
| Overall | 439,372 | 22,098 | 5.03 | ||
| Age, years | < 0.001 | ||||
| 20–24 | 138,520 | 31.53 | 5157 | 3.72 | |
| 25–29 | 155,311 | 35.35 | 7086 | 4.56 | |
| 30–34 | 68,021 | 15.48 | 3982 | 5.85 | |
| 35–49 | 77,520 | 17.64 | 5873 | 7.58 | |
| Ethnicity | 0.297 | ||||
| Han | 404,983 | 92.17 | 20,409 | 5.04 | |
| Others | 34,389 | 7.83 | 1689 | 4.91 | |
| Education | < 0.001 | ||||
| Primary or below | 30,997 | 7.05 | 2691 | 8.68 | |
| Middle school | 231,833 | 52.76 | 11,788 | 5.08 | |
| High school | 90,301 | 20.55 | 3864 | 4.28 | |
| College or above | 86,241 | 19.63 | 3755 | 4.35 | |
| Place of residence | 0.595 | ||||
| Non-agricultural | 108,066 | 24.6 | 5402 | 5.00 | |
| Agricultural | 331,306 | 75.4 | 16,696 | 5.04 | |
| Occupation | < 0.001 | ||||
| Farmer | 234,538 | 53.38 | 12,176 | 5.19 | |
| Worker | 38,794 | 8.83 | 1706 | 4.40 | |
| Merchant | 41,892 | 9.53 | 1800 | 4.30 | |
| Service staff | 14,920 | 3.4 | 710 | 4.76 | |
| Housewife | 24,938 | 5.68 | 1592 | 6.38 | |
| Civil servant | 49,613 | 11.29 | 2413 | 4.86 | |
| Others | 34,677 | 7.89 | 1701 | 4.91 | |
| Gravidity | < 0.001 | ||||
| 0 | 128,637 | 29.28 | 4255 | 3.31 | |
| ≥ 1 | 310,735 | 70.72 | 17,843 | 5.74 | |
| Parity | < 0.001 | ||||
| 0 | 186,831 | 42.52 | 7398 | 3.96 | |
| ≥ 1 | 252,541 | 57.48 | 14,700 | 5.82 | |
| History of spontaneous abortion | < 0.001 | ||||
| No | 422,547 | 96.17 | 20,983 | 4.97 | |
| Yes | 16,825 | 3.83 | 1115 | 6.63 | |
| History of induced abortion | < 0.001 | ||||
| No | 251,292 | 57.19 | 10,520 | 4.19 | |
| Yes | 188,080 | 42.81 | 11,578 | 6.16 | |
The associations of the prevalence of reproductive tract infection with sociodemographic characteristics among women of childbearing age
| Characteristic | Crude OR | 95% CI | Adjusted ORa | 95% CIa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | ||||
| ≤ 24 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| 25–29 | 1.24 | 1.19–1.28 | 1.17 | 1.12–1.21 |
| 30–34 | 1.61 | 1.54–1.68 | 1.38 | 1.32–1.44 |
| ≥ 35 | 2.12 | 2.04–2.20 | 1.65 | 1.58–1.73 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Han | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Others | 0.97 | 0.93–1.02 | 0.97 | 0.92–1.02 |
| Education | ||||
| Primary or below | 2.09 | 1.98–2.20 | 1.78 | 1.67–1.90 |
| Middle school | 1.18 | 1.13–1.22 | 1.16 | 1.10–1.22 |
| High school | 0.98 | 0.94–1.03 | 1.04 | 0.98–1.09 |
| College or above | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Place of residence | ||||
| Non-agricultural | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Agricultural | 1.01 | 0.98–1.04 | 1.00 | 0.96–1.04 |
| Occupation | ||||
| Farmer | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Worker | 0.84 | 0.80–0.89 | 0.94 | 0.89–1.00 |
| Merchant | 0.82 | 0.78–0.86 | 1.00 | 0.95–1.06 |
| Service staff | 0.91 | 0.84–0.99 | 1.03 | 0.95–1.12 |
| Housewife | 1.25 | 1.18–1.32 | 1.29 | 1.22–1.36 |
| Civil servant | 0.93 | 0.89–0.98 | 1.20 | 1.13–1.28 |
| Others | 0.94 | 0.89–0.99 | 1.09 | 1.03–1.16 |
| Parity | ||||
| 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| ≥ 1 | 1.50 | 1.46–1.54 | 1.11 | 1.07–1.15 |
| History of spontaneous abortion | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 1.36 | 1.28–1.45 | 1.36 | 1.28–1.45 |
| History of induced abortion | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 1.50 | 1.46–1.54 | 1.32 | 1.28–1.35 |
aAdjusted OR with 95% CI were calculated after adjusting age, ethnicity, education level, place of residence, occupation, parity and history of abortion (spontaneous and induced)
Fig. 2The trend of the prevalence of RTI among childbearing women from 2012 to 2016. The trend of the prevalence of RTI stratified by a age, b education level, c gravidity, d parity, e history of spontaneous abortion and f history of induced abortion
Fig. 3The trend of the prevalence of RTI and average scores of three factors among childbearing women by age from 2012 to 2016. Factor 1 (“physiology factor”) included age, gravidity, parity and history of induced abortion, Factor 2 (“social factor”) included education level and occupation, Factor 3 (“disease factor”) reflected the change of the history of spontaneous abortion