| Literature DB >> 36192488 |
Heping Wen1,2,3, Linchao Ma4, Linhao Liu4, Yiming Huang4, Zefeng Chen4, Rui Li4, Zhen Liu4, Wenxing Lin4, Jiahao Wu4, Yunqi Li4, Chongfu Zhang5.
Abstract
With the arrival of the age of big data, the amount and types of data in the process of information transmission have increased significantly, and the full-disk encryption mode used by traditional encryption algorithms has certain limitations of the times. In order to further improve the bandwidth efficiency of digital images in the transmission process and the information effectiveness of digital image transmission, this paper proposes an algorithm of high-quality restoration image encryption using DCT frequency-domain compression coding and chaos. Firstly, the image hash value is used for the generation of an encryption key with plaintext correlation, then lightweight chaos is generated based on the key to obtain a pseudo-random sequence. Secondly, the image is partitioned into subblock, and converted from time domain into frequency domain by employing Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) on each block, then perform quantization operation based on frequency domain information to obtain DCT coefficient matrix. Thirdly, the direct current (DC) coefficients and alternating current (AC) coefficients are extracted in the DCT coefficient matrix and compressed by different encoding methods to obtain two sets of bitstream containing DC coefficient and AC coefficient information. Fourthly, permute the DC coefficient bit stream by the chaotic sequence, and reconstruct it with the AC coefficient bit stream to obtain the frequency domain ciphertext image. Finally, the chaotic sequence is used to diffuse ciphertext, and the processed hash value is hidden in the ciphertext to obtain the final ciphertext. The theoretical and experimental analysis showed that the key length reaches 341 bits, and the PSNR value of the restored image is close to 60, all of which satisfy the theoretical value. Therefore, the algorithm has the characteristics of high compression rate, high-quality image restoration large key space, strong plaintext sensitivity, strong key sensitivity and so on. Our method proposed in this paper is expected to provide a new idea for confidential and secure communication in the age of big data.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36192488 PMCID: PMC9530123 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20145-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Differential comparison of DCT restoration results under different masks.
Figure 2Data comparison before and after DCT.
Figure 3DCT base images.
Figure 4(a) Bifurcation diagrams of the SCL maps; (b) Sequence comparison before and after perturbation.
Figure 5Huffman coding process.
Figure 6RLE process.
Figure 7Principle and mechanism of image encryption.
Figure 8Pixel value translation.
Figure 9Hash value hiding.
NIST-800-22 test results.
| Statistical tests | p-values | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency (monobit) test | 0.191687 | Successful |
| Block-frequency test | 0.102526 | Successful |
| Cumulative-sums test | 0.162606 | Successful |
| Runs test | 0.657933 | Successful |
| Longest-run test | 0.637119 | Successful |
| Binary matrix rank test | 0.350485 | Successful |
| Discrete fourier transform test | 0.739918 | Successful |
| Non-overlapping templates test | 0.007694 | Successful |
| Overlapping templates test | 0.574903 | Successful |
| Maurer’s universal statistical test | 0.964295 | Successful |
| Approximate entropy test | 0.834308 | Successful |
| Random-excursions test (x = − 4) | 0.000648 | Successful |
| Random-excursions variant test (x = − 9) | 0.048716 | Successful |
| Serial test-1 | 0.637119 | Successful |
| Serial test-2 | 0.699313 | Successful |
| Linear-complexity test | 0.616305 | Successful |
Key space comparison.
| Ref.[ | Ref.[ | Ref.[ | This paper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key space (bit) | 256 | 299 | 309 | 341 |
Image restoration quality analysis.
| Pictures | Size | Compression ratio (%) | UACI (%) | MSE | PSNR (dB) | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1.14.tiff[ | 22.2656 | 0.0331 | 0.0844 | 58.8668 | 0.9997 | |
| 7.1.10.tiff[ | 31.4453 | 0.0328 | 0.0837 | 58.9038 | 0.9995 | |
| 5.3.10.tiff[ | 30.2734 | 0.0323 | 0.0836 | 58.9064 | 0.9995 | |
| river.tiff[ | 33.6574 | 0.0177 | 0.0452 | 61.5837 | 0.9998 |
PSNR at constant compression rate: 80%.
| This paper | Ref.[ | JPEG | JPEG2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepper[ | 38.00 | 38.93 | 35.05 | 35.27 |
| Baboon[ | 37.46 | 30.69 | 30.89 | 28.78 |
| Boat[ | 35.66 | 38.26 | 34.52 | 31.32 |
| Cameraman[ | 45.03 | 34.82 | 45.91 | 28.97 |
Figure 10System performance analysis under different .
Figure 11Plaintext sensitivity analysis.
Figure 12Correlation coefficients distribution map of plain image and cipher image of 5.2.10.tiff (a) horizontal correlation; (b) vertically correlation; (c) diagonal correlation; (d) against angular direction correlation.
Figure 13The histograms of images before and after encryption (a) [45] plain image; (b) the histogram of (a); (c) cipher image; (d) the histogram of (c); (e) plain image; (f) the histogram of (e); (g) cipher image; (h) the histogram of (g); (i) plain image; (j) the histogram of (i); (k) [45] cipher image; (l) the histogram of (k); (m) plain image; (n) the histogram of (m); (o) cipher image; (p) the histogram of (o).
Information entropy of the plain image and ciphered image.
| Picture | Plain image | Cipher image |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1.10.tiff[ | 5.9088 | 7.9981 |
| 1.1.13.tiff[ | 7.2955 | 7.9986 |
| 5.2.10.tiff[ | 5.7056 | 7.9987 |
| 1.4.10.tiff[ | 6.9216 | 7.9996 |
Encryption time comparison.
| Picture | Encryption time (s) | Decryption time (s) | Compression ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1.11.tiff[ | 0.963761 | 0.558822 | 79.2969 % |
| motion01.512.tiff[ | 1.976872 | 0.846713 | 86.7188 % |
| 15.394230 | 3.667921 | 82.4219 % |