Literature DB >> 36190659

Enhancing learning and retention through the distribution of practice repetitions across multiple sessions.

Matthew M Walsh1, Michael A Krusmark2,3, Tiffany Jastrembski2, Devon A Hansen4,5, Kimberly A Honn4,5, Glenn Gunzelmann2.   

Abstract

The acquisition and retention of knowledge is affected by a multitude of factors including amount of practice, elapsed time since practice occurred, and the temporal distribution of practice. The third factor, temporal distribution of practice, is at the heart of research on the spacing effect. This research has consistently shown that separating practice repetitions by a delay slows acquisition but enhances retention. The current study addresses an empirical gap in the spacing effects literature. Namely, how does the allocation of a fixed number of practice repetitions among multiple sessions impact learning and retention? To address this question, we examined participants' acquisition and retention of declarative knowledge given different study schedules in which the number of practice repetitions increased, decreased, or remained constant across multiple acquisition sessions. The primary result was that retention depended strongly on the total number of sessions in which an item appeared, but not on how practice repetitions were distributed among those sessions. This outcome was consistent with predictions from a computational cognitive model of skill acquisition and retention called the Predictive Performance Equation (PPE). The success of the model in accounting for the patterns of performance across a large set of study schedules suggests that it can be used to tame the complexity of the design space and to identify schedules to enhance knowledge acquisition and retention.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive model; Memory; Spacing effect

Year:  2022        PMID: 36190659     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01361-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: repetition and recursive reminding.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

Review 2.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Harold Pashler; Edward Vul; John T Wixted; Doug Rohrer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.

Authors:  Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin; Matthew J Hays; Robert A Bjork; Nate Kornell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Noriko Coburn; Doug Rohrer; John T Wixted; Michael C Mozer; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2009

5.  Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention.

Authors:  Nicholas J Cepeda; Edward Vul; Doug Rohrer; John T Wixted; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11

6.  The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.

Authors:  K Braun; D C Rubin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1998-01

7.  Influence of multiple-day temporal distribution of repetitions on memory: a comparison of uniform, expanding, and contracting schedules.

Authors:  Emilie Gerbier; Olivier Koenig
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.

Authors:  John Dunlosky; Katherine A Rawson; Elizabeth J Marsh; Mitchell J Nathan; Daniel T Willingham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2013-01

9.  Optimising retention through multiple study opportunities over days: The benefit of an expanding schedule of repetitions.

Authors:  Emilie Gerbier; Thomas C Toppino; Olivier Koenig
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-08-12

Review 10.  What makes distributed practice effective?

Authors:  Aaron S Benjamin; Jonathan Tullis
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.