| Literature DB >> 36189143 |
Abstract
In order to solve the problem of the effect of rehabilitation physical training on physical education teaching injury, a method based on ultrasonic examination of rehabilitation physical training on physical education teaching injury effect observation method is proposed. In this method, the ISOMED isokinetic muscle strength test, the body shape test, the balance ability test, the lower limb explosive power test, and other methods are used to evaluate the knee joint of patients systematically, and the specific rehabilitation physical training plan is formulated to achieve the treatment purpose. The experimental results show that after the targeted training, a series of indicators on the affected side increase significantly: the power increases by 45.6%, the force increases by 8.3%, and the speed increases by 38.7%. It is concluded that the muscle strength, shape, balance ability, and lower limb explosive power of patients are significantly improved, which lays a solid foundation for athletes to recover smoothly and achieve good competition results.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36189143 PMCID: PMC9509252 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1470303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scanning ISSN: 0161-0457 Impact factor: 1.750
Figure 1First aid method for sports injury.
Rehabilitation training arrangement.
| The training phase | Purpose of training | Training time and schedule | Training content and specific arrangements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks 1-2 | Restore knee joint function; improve the basic strength of the affected knee joint | Monday to Friday | (1) Functional training: it involves the movement patterns in the sagittal, coronal, and horizontal planes of the shoulder joint, mainly based on resistance training; the equipment is an elastic band, medicine ball, Swiss ball, etc., 3 sets. Practice moves such as ball squats, lunges, medicine ball standing, and more. |
| Weeks 3-4 | Knee muscle volume: knee muscle strength | Monday to Friday | Training to increase the volume and strength of the muscles around the knee joint: the resistance training is mainly based on the single-plane movement mode, involving the quadriceps femoris, biceps femoris, semimembranosus, and triceps calf. The equipment is barbell and dumbbell, kettlebell, MIHA, and Technogym multifunctional training equipment; the number of times is 4-8; and the number of groups is 4-6. Practice movements such as sitting knee extension and supine leg hook. |
| Week 5 | Overall strength and endurance of lower body: explosive power of knee joint, special strength | Monday, Wednesday, Friday | (1) The overall strength and endurance of the knee joint: the resistance training is mainly based on the multiplane movement mode. The equipment is Technogym multifunctional training equipment, MIHA centrifugal training equipment, dumbbells, barbells, kettlebells, etc. The number of times is 10-15, and the number of sets is 3-4 groups. Practice movements such as weight-bearing half-squats, multidirectional lunges, and walking with bows and arrows. |
Isokinetic (60°/s) muscle strength test results of patients before rehabilitation training.
| Test indicators | Knee flexion and extension | Internal and external rotation of the knee | Ankle dorsiflexion, plantar flexion | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexion | Extension | Difference | Internal rotation | External rotation | Difference | Dorsiflexion | Plantar flexion | Difference | ||
| Peak torque (Nm) | Left | 81 | 150 | 54.1 | 22 | 24 | 8.3 | 25 | 66 | 62.1 |
| Right (afflicted) | 72 | 118 | 61.4 | 18 | 22 | 18.2 | 30 | 54 | 44.4 | |
| Two-sided difference (%) | 8.6 | 18.6 | / | 18.2 | 8.3 | / | -20 | 18.2 | / | |
Note: bilateral difference = (left − right)/left × 100%, difference in flexion and extension = (extension − flexion)/extension × 100%, difference in internal and external rotation = (external rotation − internal rotation)/external rotation × 100%, difference in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion = (plantar − dorsiflexion)/plantarflexion × 100%.
Isokinetic (60°/s) muscle strength test results on the affected side of the patient after rehabilitation training.
| Test indicators | Test time | Knee flexion and extension | Internal and external rotation of the knee | Ankle dorsiflexion, plantar flexion | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flexion | Extension | Difference | Internal rotation | External rotation | Difference | Dorsiflexion | Plantar flexion | Difference | ||
| Peak torque (Nm) | 2012.9.24 | 72 | 118 | 61.4 | 18 | 22 | 18.2 | 30 | 54 | 44.4 |
| 2012.10.31 | 85 | 142 | 60 | 19 | 24 | 20.8 | 28 | 81 | 65.4 | |
| Change rate (%) | 18.1 | 20.3 | — | 5.6 | 9.1 | — | -6.7 | 50 | — | |
Note: change rate = (poster − anterior)/anterior × 100%, difference in flexion and extension = (extension − flexion)/extension × 100%, difference in internal and external rotation = (external rotation − internal rotation)/external rotation × 100%, difference in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion = (plantar − dorsiflexion)/plantarflexion × 100%.
Changes in body shape.
| Test date | Body composition | Thigh and calf muscle circumference (cm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | Muscle weight (kg) | Body fat ratio | Thigh root | Knee edge | Calf circumference | ||||
| Left | Right | Left | Right | Left | Right | ||||
| 9.24 | 52.3 | 40.3 | 18.2% | 51.5 | 51.5 | 37.5 | 36.5 | 34.0 | 34.0 |
| 10.31 | 53.8 | 42.3 | 16.6% | 51.8 | 51.6 | 38.0 | 37.5 | 34.3 | 34.2 |
The test changes of balance ability and explosive force.
| Test content | Balance ability | Explosive force | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power (w/kg) | Force (N/kg) | Speed (cm/s) | |||||||||
| Left | Right | Left | Right | Difference | Left | Right | Difference | Left | Right | Difference | |
| 9.24 | 70 | 15 | 18.8 | 14.7 | 29.3 | 16.7 | 12.8 | 30.5 | 136 | 106 | 28.3 |
| 10. 31 | 105 | 65 | 19.2 | 21.4 | -10.3 | 16.9 | 17.7 | -4.5 | 137 | 147 | -6.8 |
| Change rate (%) | 50 | 266.7 | 2.1 | 45.6 | — | 1.2 | 38.3 | — | 0.7 | 38.7 | — |
Note: change rate = (back − front)/front × 100%; bilateral difference (%) = (left − right)/right × 100%.
Figure 2The increase of the affected side of the explosive power test index after the training.